Loading…
Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study
Abstract Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of faculty-specific electronic reminders on increasing faculty compliance with completing daily anesthesia resident evaluations. Design Retrospective study. Setting Anesthesiology Residency Program at Oregon Health & Science University. Measur...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2009-05, Vol.21 (3), p.159-164 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143 |
container_end_page | 164 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Journal of clinical anesthesia |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Rusa, Renata, MD Klatil, Frank, MS Fu, Rongwei, PhD Swide, Christopher E., MD |
description | Abstract Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of faculty-specific electronic reminders on increasing faculty compliance with completing daily anesthesia resident evaluations. Design Retrospective study. Setting Anesthesiology Residency Program at Oregon Health & Science University. Measurements 41 faculty members on staff from February 2004 through January 2006 were studied for compliance with submitting daily anesthesia resident evaluations 12 months before and 12 months after implementation of a faculty-specific electronic reminder system. Evaluations were entered into a customized, web-based Daily Resident Evaluation database. Data for the reminders were obtained from the Surgical Schedule database. At the end of the study period, data on compliance with our daily resident evaluation system was aggregated by month and compared before versus after system implementation. Main Results A total of 1,222 of 3,893 possible evaluations (31.4%) were submitted before the faculty-specific electronic reminder system was in place, with 38 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (93% participation). After the intervention, 1,824 of 4,263 possible evaluations (42.8%) were submitted, with all 41 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (100% participation). The percentage of resident evaluations submitted by the faculty increased from 29.3% to 42.9% ( P < 0.0001) after introducing the faculty-specific reminders. Faculty in the lowest quartile of compliance prior to the intervention showed the largest improvement (446% increase). Conclusions A faculty-specific electronic reminder system improved faculty compliance with submitting resident evaluations. The faculty members with the lowest compliance prior to implementation of this system benefited the most. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67276875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0952818009000452</els_id><sourcerecordid>2744548481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMoznP0KwwB0V2fSZq2iQsZGUYdGHChrkOa3GJq-sckfVLww0_Ke-PAbFwlXH45ufeci9AFJXtKaP2u3_fGu1GPsGeEiFzcE8KfoB0VTVnwismnaEdkxQpBBTlDL2LsSSYqRp-jMyp5zWvS7NDfm2HWJuGpw502i09rEWcwrnMGgweTwjTma4DBjRZCxNN4D2IzDbN3ejSA_7j0E1vt_JrR6CyMCcNB-0UnN43xPda5nrU27eQOgGNa7PoSPeu0j_DqdJ6jH5-uv199KW6_fr65-nhbGN7IVLSsZmBr2ghKjGyhLS0hsm1Eyzpeci1LTkRntSUVrXkra8s4aOBlK8qKU16eo7dH3TlMvxeISQ0uGvA-2zctUdUNa2rRVBl8_QjspyWMuTdFScmlIILRTNVHyuSBYoBOzcENOqwZUls6qlf36agtna2evc8PL07ySzuAfXh2iiMDb06Ajkb7LmRzXfzHMVoJWZGtg8sjB9m1g4OgonGQg7AuZIOVndz_e_nwSGKjXP71F6wQH-ZWkSmivm27tK0Skcc1Ku8Ayw7HdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034980821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rusa, Renata, MD ; Klatil, Frank, MS ; Fu, Rongwei, PhD ; Swide, Christopher E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rusa, Renata, MD ; Klatil, Frank, MS ; Fu, Rongwei, PhD ; Swide, Christopher E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of faculty-specific electronic reminders on increasing faculty compliance with completing daily anesthesia resident evaluations. Design Retrospective study. Setting Anesthesiology Residency Program at Oregon Health & Science University. Measurements 41 faculty members on staff from February 2004 through January 2006 were studied for compliance with submitting daily anesthesia resident evaluations 12 months before and 12 months after implementation of a faculty-specific electronic reminder system. Evaluations were entered into a customized, web-based Daily Resident Evaluation database. Data for the reminders were obtained from the Surgical Schedule database. At the end of the study period, data on compliance with our daily resident evaluation system was aggregated by month and compared before versus after system implementation. Main Results A total of 1,222 of 3,893 possible evaluations (31.4%) were submitted before the faculty-specific electronic reminder system was in place, with 38 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (93% participation). After the intervention, 1,824 of 4,263 possible evaluations (42.8%) were submitted, with all 41 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (100% participation). The percentage of resident evaluations submitted by the faculty increased from 29.3% to 42.9% ( P < 0.0001) after introducing the faculty-specific reminders. Faculty in the lowest quartile of compliance prior to the intervention showed the largest improvement (446% increase). Conclusions A faculty-specific electronic reminder system improved faculty compliance with submitting resident evaluations. The faculty members with the lowest compliance prior to implementation of this system benefited the most.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19464607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiologists ; Anesthesiology ; Anesthesiology - education ; Anesthesiology residency programs ; Automation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Compliance ; Confidence intervals ; Databases, Factual ; Education ; Education, Medical - methods ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Technology - methods ; Electronic mail systems ; Electronic reminder system ; Faculty, Medical - standards ; Feedback ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Intervention ; Medical residencies ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Oregon ; Pain Medicine ; Reminder Systems ; Residency program ; Resident education ; Resident evaluation ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2009-05, Vol.21 (3), p.159-164</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21589501$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19464607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rusa, Renata, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klatil, Frank, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Rongwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swide, Christopher E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of faculty-specific electronic reminders on increasing faculty compliance with completing daily anesthesia resident evaluations. Design Retrospective study. Setting Anesthesiology Residency Program at Oregon Health & Science University. Measurements 41 faculty members on staff from February 2004 through January 2006 were studied for compliance with submitting daily anesthesia resident evaluations 12 months before and 12 months after implementation of a faculty-specific electronic reminder system. Evaluations were entered into a customized, web-based Daily Resident Evaluation database. Data for the reminders were obtained from the Surgical Schedule database. At the end of the study period, data on compliance with our daily resident evaluation system was aggregated by month and compared before versus after system implementation. Main Results A total of 1,222 of 3,893 possible evaluations (31.4%) were submitted before the faculty-specific electronic reminder system was in place, with 38 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (93% participation). After the intervention, 1,824 of 4,263 possible evaluations (42.8%) were submitted, with all 41 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (100% participation). The percentage of resident evaluations submitted by the faculty increased from 29.3% to 42.9% ( P < 0.0001) after introducing the faculty-specific reminders. Faculty in the lowest quartile of compliance prior to the intervention showed the largest improvement (446% increase). Conclusions A faculty-specific electronic reminder system improved faculty compliance with submitting resident evaluations. The faculty members with the lowest compliance prior to implementation of this system benefited the most.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiologists</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - education</subject><subject>Anesthesiology residency programs</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Technology - methods</subject><subject>Electronic mail systems</subject><subject>Electronic reminder system</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical residencies</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Reminder Systems</subject><subject>Residency program</subject><subject>Resident education</subject><subject>Resident evaluation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMoznP0KwwB0V2fSZq2iQsZGUYdGHChrkOa3GJq-sckfVLww0_Ke-PAbFwlXH45ufeci9AFJXtKaP2u3_fGu1GPsGeEiFzcE8KfoB0VTVnwismnaEdkxQpBBTlDL2LsSSYqRp-jMyp5zWvS7NDfm2HWJuGpw502i09rEWcwrnMGgweTwjTma4DBjRZCxNN4D2IzDbN3ejSA_7j0E1vt_JrR6CyMCcNB-0UnN43xPda5nrU27eQOgGNa7PoSPeu0j_DqdJ6jH5-uv199KW6_fr65-nhbGN7IVLSsZmBr2ghKjGyhLS0hsm1Eyzpeci1LTkRntSUVrXkra8s4aOBlK8qKU16eo7dH3TlMvxeISQ0uGvA-2zctUdUNa2rRVBl8_QjspyWMuTdFScmlIILRTNVHyuSBYoBOzcENOqwZUls6qlf36agtna2evc8PL07ySzuAfXh2iiMDb06Ajkb7LmRzXfzHMVoJWZGtg8sjB9m1g4OgonGQg7AuZIOVndz_e_nwSGKjXP71F6wQH-ZWkSmivm27tK0Skcc1Ku8Ayw7HdQ</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Rusa, Renata, MD</creator><creator>Klatil, Frank, MS</creator><creator>Fu, Rongwei, PhD</creator><creator>Swide, Christopher E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study</title><author>Rusa, Renata, MD ; Klatil, Frank, MS ; Fu, Rongwei, PhD ; Swide, Christopher E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiologists</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - education</topic><topic>Anesthesiology residency programs</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Technology - methods</topic><topic>Electronic mail systems</topic><topic>Electronic reminder system</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical residencies</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Reminder Systems</topic><topic>Residency program</topic><topic>Resident education</topic><topic>Resident evaluation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rusa, Renata, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klatil, Frank, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Rongwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swide, Christopher E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rusa, Renata, MD</au><au>Klatil, Frank, MS</au><au>Fu, Rongwei, PhD</au><au>Swide, Christopher E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>159-164</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of faculty-specific electronic reminders on increasing faculty compliance with completing daily anesthesia resident evaluations. Design Retrospective study. Setting Anesthesiology Residency Program at Oregon Health & Science University. Measurements 41 faculty members on staff from February 2004 through January 2006 were studied for compliance with submitting daily anesthesia resident evaluations 12 months before and 12 months after implementation of a faculty-specific electronic reminder system. Evaluations were entered into a customized, web-based Daily Resident Evaluation database. Data for the reminders were obtained from the Surgical Schedule database. At the end of the study period, data on compliance with our daily resident evaluation system was aggregated by month and compared before versus after system implementation. Main Results A total of 1,222 of 3,893 possible evaluations (31.4%) were submitted before the faculty-specific electronic reminder system was in place, with 38 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (93% participation). After the intervention, 1,824 of 4,263 possible evaluations (42.8%) were submitted, with all 41 faculty submitting at least one evaluation (100% participation). The percentage of resident evaluations submitted by the faculty increased from 29.3% to 42.9% ( P < 0.0001) after introducing the faculty-specific reminders. Faculty in the lowest quartile of compliance prior to the intervention showed the largest improvement (446% increase). Conclusions A faculty-specific electronic reminder system improved faculty compliance with submitting resident evaluations. The faculty members with the lowest compliance prior to implementation of this system benefited the most.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19464607</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2009-05, Vol.21 (3), p.159-164 |
issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67276875 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesiologists Anesthesiology Anesthesiology - education Anesthesiology residency programs Automation Biological and medical sciences Compliance Confidence intervals Databases, Factual Education Education, Medical - methods Educational Measurement - methods Educational Technology - methods Electronic mail systems Electronic reminder system Faculty, Medical - standards Feedback Guideline Adherence Humans Internship and Residency Intervention Medical residencies Medical sciences Medicine Oregon Pain Medicine Reminder Systems Residency program Resident education Resident evaluation Retrospective Studies Studies |
title | Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20faculty-specific%20electronic%20reminders%20on%20faculty%20compliance%20with%20daily%20resident%20evaluations:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Rusa,%20Renata,%20MD&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=159-164&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744548481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b262ed617810c9beb3d009b78b2f434a93408fdad05164b96d24eae43b8354143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034980821&rft_id=info:pmid/19464607&rfr_iscdi=true |