Loading…
Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Summary Background Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2009-05, Vol.373 (9677), p.1773-1779 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3 |
container_end_page | 1779 |
container_issue | 9677 |
container_start_page | 1773 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 373 |
creator | Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof Williams, David, Dr |
description | Summary Background Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions and the effect of factors that might modify the risk. Methods We identified cohort studies in which women who had developed type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes were followed up between Jan 1, 1960, and Jan 31, 2009, from Embase and Medline. 205 relevant reports were hand searched. We selected 20 studies that included 675 455 women and 10 859 type 2 diabetic events. We calculated and pooled unadjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for each study using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysed were the number of cases of type 2 diabetes, ethnic origin, duration of follow-up, maternal age, body-mass index, and diagnostic criteria. Findings Women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who had a normoglycaemic pregnancy (RR 7·43, 95% CI 4·79–11·51). Although the largest study (659 164 women; 9502 cases of type 2 diabetes) had the largest RR (12·6, 95% CI 12·15–13·19), RRs were generally consistent among the subgroups assessed. Interpretation Increased awareness of the magnitude and timing of the risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes among patients and clinicians could provide an opportunity to test and use dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions that might prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in affected women. Funding None. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67288040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0140673609607315</els_id><sourcerecordid>67288040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rFTEUhoMo9rb6E5RBsNjF6Ekmycy4aJHiFxRcWEHchExyRlLn4zZnxjL_3twPbqEbV1mc531zzsPYCw5vOXD97jtwCbkuC_0G6jMNZcFz9YituCxlrmT58zFbHZAjdkx0AwBSg3rKjngttRKFWLFf18saM5H5YBuckLIeuy5MM2W2nTBmv5EmO4VxsN2BeZ_ZjBaasE8Tl0X8G_Aus4NP4cnmNrELBXrGnrS2I3y-f0_Yj08fry-_5FffPn-9_HCVO1mqKVdNYUXtsPVWFZ5Li7LiBefeOaF5ozzUnnuNjqsGdds2lVReCCyELxtV--KEne5613G8ndO-pg_k0hl2wHEmo0tRVSAhga8egDfjHNO2ZHhdg-CqEglSO8jFkShia9Yx9DYuhoPZmDdb82aj1UBttuaNSrmX-_K56dHfp_aqE_B6D1hytmujHVygAye4rEBombiLHYfJWTIbDbmAg0MfIrrJ-DH8d5XzBw2uC0NIn_7BBen-aEPCwK5k0wH1tkEV_wBNcLT5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199021582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS ; Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD ; Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof ; Williams, David, Dr</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS ; Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD ; Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof ; Williams, David, Dr</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions and the effect of factors that might modify the risk. Methods We identified cohort studies in which women who had developed type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes were followed up between Jan 1, 1960, and Jan 31, 2009, from Embase and Medline. 205 relevant reports were hand searched. We selected 20 studies that included 675 455 women and 10 859 type 2 diabetic events. We calculated and pooled unadjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for each study using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysed were the number of cases of type 2 diabetes, ethnic origin, duration of follow-up, maternal age, body-mass index, and diagnostic criteria. Findings Women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who had a normoglycaemic pregnancy (RR 7·43, 95% CI 4·79–11·51). Although the largest study (659 164 women; 9502 cases of type 2 diabetes) had the largest RR (12·6, 95% CI 12·15–13·19), RRs were generally consistent among the subgroups assessed. Interpretation Increased awareness of the magnitude and timing of the risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes among patients and clinicians could provide an opportunity to test and use dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions that might prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in affected women. Funding None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19465232</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aftercare ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Diabetes, Gestational - etiology ; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance ; Effectiveness ; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) ; Endocrinopathies ; Etiopathogenesis. Screening. Investigations. Target tissue resistance ; Female ; General aspects ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Maternal Age ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Postnatal Care ; Pregnancy ; Research Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2009-05, Vol.373 (9677), p.1773-1779</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 23-May 29, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21480264$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19465232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David, Dr</creatorcontrib><title>Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Background Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions and the effect of factors that might modify the risk. Methods We identified cohort studies in which women who had developed type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes were followed up between Jan 1, 1960, and Jan 31, 2009, from Embase and Medline. 205 relevant reports were hand searched. We selected 20 studies that included 675 455 women and 10 859 type 2 diabetic events. We calculated and pooled unadjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for each study using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysed were the number of cases of type 2 diabetes, ethnic origin, duration of follow-up, maternal age, body-mass index, and diagnostic criteria. Findings Women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who had a normoglycaemic pregnancy (RR 7·43, 95% CI 4·79–11·51). Although the largest study (659 164 women; 9502 cases of type 2 diabetes) had the largest RR (12·6, 95% CI 12·15–13·19), RRs were generally consistent among the subgroups assessed. Interpretation Increased awareness of the magnitude and timing of the risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes among patients and clinicians could provide an opportunity to test and use dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions that might prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in affected women. Funding None.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aftercare</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>Etiopathogenesis. Screening. Investigations. Target tissue resistance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Postnatal Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rFTEUhoMo9rb6E5RBsNjF6Ekmycy4aJHiFxRcWEHchExyRlLn4zZnxjL_3twPbqEbV1mc531zzsPYCw5vOXD97jtwCbkuC_0G6jMNZcFz9YituCxlrmT58zFbHZAjdkx0AwBSg3rKjngttRKFWLFf18saM5H5YBuckLIeuy5MM2W2nTBmv5EmO4VxsN2BeZ_ZjBaasE8Tl0X8G_Aus4NP4cnmNrELBXrGnrS2I3y-f0_Yj08fry-_5FffPn-9_HCVO1mqKVdNYUXtsPVWFZ5Li7LiBefeOaF5ozzUnnuNjqsGdds2lVReCCyELxtV--KEne5613G8ndO-pg_k0hl2wHEmo0tRVSAhga8egDfjHNO2ZHhdg-CqEglSO8jFkShia9Yx9DYuhoPZmDdb82aj1UBttuaNSrmX-_K56dHfp_aqE_B6D1hytmujHVygAye4rEBombiLHYfJWTIbDbmAg0MfIrrJ-DH8d5XzBw2uC0NIn_7BBen-aEPCwK5k0wH1tkEV_wBNcLT5</recordid><startdate>20090523</startdate><enddate>20090523</enddate><creator>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS</creator><creator>Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD</creator><creator>Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof</creator><creator>Williams, David, Dr</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090523</creationdate><title>Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS ; Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD ; Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof ; Williams, David, Dr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aftercare</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>Etiopathogenesis. Screening. Investigations. Target tissue resistance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Postnatal Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David, Dr</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellamy, Leanne, MBBS</au><au>Casas, Juan-Pablo, MD</au><au>Hingorani, Aroon D, Prof</au><au>Williams, David, Dr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2009-05-23</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>373</volume><issue>9677</issue><spage>1773</spage><epage>1779</epage><pages>1773-1779</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions and the effect of factors that might modify the risk. Methods We identified cohort studies in which women who had developed type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes were followed up between Jan 1, 1960, and Jan 31, 2009, from Embase and Medline. 205 relevant reports were hand searched. We selected 20 studies that included 675 455 women and 10 859 type 2 diabetic events. We calculated and pooled unadjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for each study using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysed were the number of cases of type 2 diabetes, ethnic origin, duration of follow-up, maternal age, body-mass index, and diagnostic criteria. Findings Women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who had a normoglycaemic pregnancy (RR 7·43, 95% CI 4·79–11·51). Although the largest study (659 164 women; 9502 cases of type 2 diabetes) had the largest RR (12·6, 95% CI 12·15–13·19), RRs were generally consistent among the subgroups assessed. Interpretation Increased awareness of the magnitude and timing of the risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes among patients and clinicians could provide an opportunity to test and use dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions that might prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in affected women. Funding None.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19465232</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2009-05, Vol.373 (9677), p.1773-1779 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67288040 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aftercare Bias Biological and medical sciences Cohort Studies Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology Diabetes, Gestational - etiology Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance Effectiveness Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) Endocrinopathies Etiopathogenesis. Screening. Investigations. Target tissue resistance Female General aspects Glucose Tolerance Test Humans Internal Medicine Maternal Age Medical sciences Meta-analysis Middle Aged Minority & ethnic groups Postnatal Care Pregnancy Research Design Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Risk Factors Risk Reduction Behavior Studies Systematic review Womens health Young Adult |
title | Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Type%202%20diabetes%20mellitus%20after%20gestational%20diabetes:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Bellamy,%20Leanne,%20MBBS&rft.date=2009-05-23&rft.volume=373&rft.issue=9677&rft.spage=1773&rft.epage=1779&rft.pages=1773-1779&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67288040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5b3a29cefda53d14ae481311dcc261b5d09d1d6ec15be6ffb845d22e32d7b59d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199021582&rft_id=info:pmid/19465232&rfr_iscdi=true |