Loading…

Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers

The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2005-02, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253
Main Authors: Meiland, Franka J.M., Dröes, Rose-Marie, Lange, Jacomine de, Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title Health policy (Amsterdam)
container_volume 71
creator Meiland, Franka J.M.
Dröes, Rose-Marie
Lange, Jacomine de
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.
description The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical model was developed that distinguishes different phases of implementation, and factors at the level of characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions. Qualitative methods were used, including interviews with 23 key figures and other written materials gathered. The interview data were double coded and analyzed, using the computer programme NVivo. Several factors proved to play a facilitating role in all phases of implementation, for example: motivated people, financial resources, continuous and varied PR-activities, and cooperation between organizations. Other important facilitating characteristics of the meeting centres were: the surplus value of the integrated support programme as compared to the local support offer, and the fact that several centres were already available as an example for new initiators. The findings were used, among other things, to develop an implementation guide, to facilitate the implementation of meeting centres.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67333873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168851004001976</els_id><sourcerecordid>67333873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctu3CAURVGjZpr2F1pW3dkFYwxZRlHThyJ1k64RhuuYkW1cYKbK3_fOQ-kyi_uCc46u7iHkE2c1Z7z7sq1HsFMZ1zjVDWNtzXTNOL8gG65VU3VMtm_IBpG60pKzK_Iu5y1jTAnRvSVXXHbY6m5D9vfWhSkUW2LK1C6e9jalADiEhZYRaJjXCWZYEBLiQuNwfJ0BSlieqMOPBJnO0cNEh5joChEJ9G8oI_VHYrBHYaSFRJ1NKP6eXA52yvDhXK_J7_uvj3ffq4df337c3T5Uru1UqVrvwfZKtGpQftAW56aVQrjGqhs-9IJx13iuGZfCWd5jAAPuB-lsIzSIa_L5pLum-GcHuZg5ZAfTZBeIu2w6PIjQmF4DCs3kjWoUAtUJ6FLMOcFg1hRmm54NZ-bgjdmaF2_MwRvDtEFvkPnzxEywgnuhAcAIiA1mb4RVHNMzBjIllnBoMdZDbYVppDBjmVHs43nfXT-D_7_E2VkE3J4AgOfdo6EmuwCLAx8SuGJ8DK9u_A8bw8Ak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38059727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Meiland, Franka J.M. ; Dröes, Rose-Marie ; Lange, Jacomine de ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meiland, Franka J.M. ; Dröes, Rose-Marie ; Lange, Jacomine de ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical model was developed that distinguishes different phases of implementation, and factors at the level of characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions. Qualitative methods were used, including interviews with 23 key figures and other written materials gathered. The interview data were double coded and analyzed, using the computer programme NVivo. Several factors proved to play a facilitating role in all phases of implementation, for example: motivated people, financial resources, continuous and varied PR-activities, and cooperation between organizations. Other important facilitating characteristics of the meeting centres were: the surplus value of the integrated support programme as compared to the local support offer, and the fact that several centres were already available as an example for new initiators. The findings were used, among other things, to develop an implementation guide, to facilitate the implementation of meeting centres.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15607386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive implementation ; Caregivers - psychology ; Carers ; Caring ; Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration ; Dementia ; Dementia - nursing ; Facilitators ; Health ; Health administration ; Health policy ; Humans ; Impediments ; Interviews as Topic ; Mental illness ; Netherlands ; Policy studies ; Social Support ; Support programme</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2005-02, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33205</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15607386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeehepoli/v_3a71_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a243-253.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meiland, Franka J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dröes, Rose-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, Jacomine de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><description>The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical model was developed that distinguishes different phases of implementation, and factors at the level of characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions. Qualitative methods were used, including interviews with 23 key figures and other written materials gathered. The interview data were double coded and analyzed, using the computer programme NVivo. Several factors proved to play a facilitating role in all phases of implementation, for example: motivated people, financial resources, continuous and varied PR-activities, and cooperation between organizations. Other important facilitating characteristics of the meeting centres were: the surplus value of the integrated support programme as compared to the local support offer, and the fact that several centres were already available as an example for new initiators. The findings were used, among other things, to develop an implementation guide, to facilitate the implementation of meeting centres.</description><subject>Adaptive implementation</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Caring</subject><subject>Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - nursing</subject><subject>Facilitators</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impediments</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Support programme</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUctu3CAURVGjZpr2F1pW3dkFYwxZRlHThyJ1k64RhuuYkW1cYKbK3_fOQ-kyi_uCc46u7iHkE2c1Z7z7sq1HsFMZ1zjVDWNtzXTNOL8gG65VU3VMtm_IBpG60pKzK_Iu5y1jTAnRvSVXXHbY6m5D9vfWhSkUW2LK1C6e9jalADiEhZYRaJjXCWZYEBLiQuNwfJ0BSlieqMOPBJnO0cNEh5joChEJ9G8oI_VHYrBHYaSFRJ1NKP6eXA52yvDhXK_J7_uvj3ffq4df337c3T5Uru1UqVrvwfZKtGpQftAW56aVQrjGqhs-9IJx13iuGZfCWd5jAAPuB-lsIzSIa_L5pLum-GcHuZg5ZAfTZBeIu2w6PIjQmF4DCs3kjWoUAtUJ6FLMOcFg1hRmm54NZ-bgjdmaF2_MwRvDtEFvkPnzxEywgnuhAcAIiA1mb4RVHNMzBjIllnBoMdZDbYVppDBjmVHs43nfXT-D_7_E2VkE3J4AgOfdo6EmuwCLAx8SuGJ8DK9u_A8bw8Ak</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Meiland, Franka J.M.</creator><creator>Dröes, Rose-Marie</creator><creator>Lange, Jacomine de</creator><creator>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers</title><author>Meiland, Franka J.M. ; Dröes, Rose-Marie ; Lange, Jacomine de ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptive implementation</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Caring</topic><topic>Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - nursing</topic><topic>Facilitators</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impediments</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Support programme</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meiland, Franka J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dröes, Rose-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, Jacomine de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meiland, Franka J.M.</au><au>Dröes, Rose-Marie</au><au>Lange, Jacomine de</au><au>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J.F.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>243-253</pages><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical model was developed that distinguishes different phases of implementation, and factors at the level of characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions. Qualitative methods were used, including interviews with 23 key figures and other written materials gathered. The interview data were double coded and analyzed, using the computer programme NVivo. Several factors proved to play a facilitating role in all phases of implementation, for example: motivated people, financial resources, continuous and varied PR-activities, and cooperation between organizations. Other important facilitating characteristics of the meeting centres were: the surplus value of the integrated support programme as compared to the local support offer, and the fact that several centres were already available as an example for new initiators. The findings were used, among other things, to develop an implementation guide, to facilitate the implementation of meeting centres.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>15607386</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8510
ispartof Health policy (Amsterdam), 2005-02, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253
issn 0168-8510
1872-6054
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67333873
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier
subjects Adaptive implementation
Caregivers - psychology
Carers
Caring
Community Health Centers - organization & administration
Dementia
Dementia - nursing
Facilitators
Health
Health administration
Health policy
Humans
Impediments
Interviews as Topic
Mental illness
Netherlands
Policy studies
Social Support
Support programme
title Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitators%20and%20barriers%20in%20the%20implementation%20of%20the%20meeting%20centres%20model%20for%20people%20with%20dementia%20and%20their%20carers&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Meiland,%20Franka%20J.M.&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=243-253&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67333873%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4ddeab7347f7df8a4dd24533c2a791fb301c2d180153ca1bca1e0e1df5ca238e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38059727&rft_id=info:pmid/15607386&rfr_iscdi=true