Loading…

Effect Size and Power in Assessing Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables Using Multiple Regression: A 30-Year Review

The authors conducted a 30-year review (1969-1998) of the size of moderating effects of categorical variables as assessed using multiple regression. The median observed effect size ( f 2 ) is only.002, but 72% of the moderator tests reviewed had power of.80 or greater to detect a targeted effect con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2005-01, Vol.90 (1), p.94-107
Main Authors: Aguinis, Herman, Beaty, James C, Boik, Robert J, Pierce, Charles A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors conducted a 30-year review (1969-1998) of the size of moderating effects of categorical variables as assessed using multiple regression. The median observed effect size ( f 2 ) is only.002, but 72% of the moderator tests reviewed had power of.80 or greater to detect a targeted effect conventionally defined as small. Results suggest the need to minimize the influence of artifacts that produce a downward bias in the observed effect size and put into question the use of conventional definitions of moderating effect sizes. As long as an effect has a meaningful impact, the authors advise researchers to conduct a power analysis and plan future research designs on the basis of smaller and more realistic targeted effect sizes.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94