Loading…
Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols
Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were d...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of radiology 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3 |
container_end_page | 516 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 512 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Maglinte, Dean D.T Applegate, Kimberly E Rajesh, Arumugam Jennings, S. Gregory Ford, Jason M Savabi, Mojgan Sarah Lappas, John C |
description | Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67371464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X08001150</els_id><sourcerecordid>67371464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2r1DAUhoso3vHqLxAkG911PPlo0wgKMvgFF1yo4C6kyek1tZPUpL0yS_-5GWdUcOMqyeF9z8eTU1UPKWwp0PbpuMUxGbdlAN0W2BYov1VtaCdZLSWTt6sNSAY1iO7zRXUv5xEAGqHY3eqCdlw20LFN9WMXQ7Y-rplkdGbxMZAhJjKXK4YlkzU4TNfRh2tS3piinQ7Z52dkF_ezScf48gVJNgMuB2KC-22tE84xLegIDgPaxd9gwJxJHMjyPZI5xSXaOOX71Z3BTBkfnM_L6tPrVx93b-ur92_e7V5e1VYIttTYc45Guh7FoKziTkjbGKl435aQUK0DVXqQzrm2UcwioOibXglUQ9Nwxy-rJ6e8pfK3FfOi9z5bnCYTsIyvW8klFa0oQn4S2hRzTjjoOfm9SQdNQR_J61H_Iq-P5DUwXcgX16Nz-rXfo_vrOaMugsdngcnWTEMywfr8R8doqxQDWXTPTzosMG48Jl3-B4NF51PBqF30_2nkxT9-O_ngS8mveMA8xjWFwllTnYtBfzguyXFHoAOgtAH-Ewt9vB0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67371464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18375082</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJRADR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conscious Sedation - methods ; CT enteroclysis ; Diazepam - administration & dosage ; Digestive system ; Female ; Fentanyl - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage ; Intestines - diagnostic imaging ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Midazolam - administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography ; Radiologic sedation/analgesia ; Radiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21699207$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Kimberly E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajesh, Arumugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S. Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - methods</subject><subject>CT enteroclysis</subject><subject>Diazepam - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midazolam - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiologic sedation/analgesia</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2r1DAUhoso3vHqLxAkG911PPlo0wgKMvgFF1yo4C6kyek1tZPUpL0yS_-5GWdUcOMqyeF9z8eTU1UPKWwp0PbpuMUxGbdlAN0W2BYov1VtaCdZLSWTt6sNSAY1iO7zRXUv5xEAGqHY3eqCdlw20LFN9WMXQ7Y-rplkdGbxMZAhJjKXK4YlkzU4TNfRh2tS3piinQ7Z52dkF_ezScf48gVJNgMuB2KC-22tE84xLegIDgPaxd9gwJxJHMjyPZI5xSXaOOX71Z3BTBkfnM_L6tPrVx93b-ur92_e7V5e1VYIttTYc45Guh7FoKziTkjbGKl435aQUK0DVXqQzrm2UcwioOibXglUQ9Nwxy-rJ6e8pfK3FfOi9z5bnCYTsIyvW8klFa0oQn4S2hRzTjjoOfm9SQdNQR_J61H_Iq-P5DUwXcgX16Nz-rXfo_vrOaMugsdngcnWTEMywfr8R8doqxQDWXTPTzosMG48Jl3-B4NF51PBqF30_2nkxT9-O_ngS8mveMA8xjWFwllTnYtBfzguyXFHoAOgtAH-Ewt9vB0</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creator><creator>Applegate, Kimberly E</creator><creator>Rajesh, Arumugam</creator><creator>Jennings, S. Gregory</creator><creator>Ford, Jason M</creator><creator>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creator><creator>Lappas, John C</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><author>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - methods</topic><topic>CT enteroclysis</topic><topic>Diazepam - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midazolam - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiologic sedation/analgesia</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Kimberly E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajesh, Arumugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S. Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maglinte, Dean D.T</au><au>Applegate, Kimberly E</au><au>Rajesh, Arumugam</au><au>Jennings, S. Gregory</au><au>Ford, Jason M</au><au>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</au><au>Lappas, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>512-516</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><coden>EJRADR</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18375082</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67371464 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Conscious Sedation - methods CT enteroclysis Diazepam - administration & dosage Digestive system Female Fentanyl - administration & dosage Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage Intestines - diagnostic imaging Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Midazolam - administration & dosage Middle Aged Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiography Radiologic sedation/analgesia Radiology Treatment Outcome |
title | Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A54%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conscious%20sedation%20for%20patients%20undergoing%20enteroclysis:%20Comparing%20the%20safety%20and%20patient-reported%20effectiveness%20of%20two%20protocols&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Maglinte,%20Dean%20D.T&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=512-516&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft.coden=EJRADR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67371464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67371464&rft_id=info:pmid/18375082&rfr_iscdi=true |