Loading…

Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols

Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of radiology 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516
Main Authors: Maglinte, Dean D.T, Applegate, Kimberly E, Rajesh, Arumugam, Jennings, S. Gregory, Ford, Jason M, Savabi, Mojgan Sarah, Lappas, John C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3
container_end_page 516
container_issue 3
container_start_page 512
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 70
creator Maglinte, Dean D.T
Applegate, Kimberly E
Rajesh, Arumugam
Jennings, S. Gregory
Ford, Jason M
Savabi, Mojgan Sarah
Lappas, John C
description Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67371464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X08001150</els_id><sourcerecordid>67371464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2r1DAUhoso3vHqLxAkG911PPlo0wgKMvgFF1yo4C6kyek1tZPUpL0yS_-5GWdUcOMqyeF9z8eTU1UPKWwp0PbpuMUxGbdlAN0W2BYov1VtaCdZLSWTt6sNSAY1iO7zRXUv5xEAGqHY3eqCdlw20LFN9WMXQ7Y-rplkdGbxMZAhJjKXK4YlkzU4TNfRh2tS3piinQ7Z52dkF_ezScf48gVJNgMuB2KC-22tE84xLegIDgPaxd9gwJxJHMjyPZI5xSXaOOX71Z3BTBkfnM_L6tPrVx93b-ur92_e7V5e1VYIttTYc45Guh7FoKziTkjbGKl435aQUK0DVXqQzrm2UcwioOibXglUQ9Nwxy-rJ6e8pfK3FfOi9z5bnCYTsIyvW8klFa0oQn4S2hRzTjjoOfm9SQdNQR_J61H_Iq-P5DUwXcgX16Nz-rXfo_vrOaMugsdngcnWTEMywfr8R8doqxQDWXTPTzosMG48Jl3-B4NF51PBqF30_2nkxT9-O_ngS8mveMA8xjWFwllTnYtBfzguyXFHoAOgtAH-Ewt9vB0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67371464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18375082</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJRADR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conscious Sedation - methods ; CT enteroclysis ; Diazepam - administration &amp; dosage ; Digestive system ; Female ; Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage ; Intestines - diagnostic imaging ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage ; Middle Aged ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography ; Radiologic sedation/analgesia ; Radiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21699207$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Kimberly E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajesh, Arumugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S. Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - methods</subject><subject>CT enteroclysis</subject><subject>Diazepam - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiologic sedation/analgesia</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2r1DAUhoso3vHqLxAkG911PPlo0wgKMvgFF1yo4C6kyek1tZPUpL0yS_-5GWdUcOMqyeF9z8eTU1UPKWwp0PbpuMUxGbdlAN0W2BYov1VtaCdZLSWTt6sNSAY1iO7zRXUv5xEAGqHY3eqCdlw20LFN9WMXQ7Y-rplkdGbxMZAhJjKXK4YlkzU4TNfRh2tS3piinQ7Z52dkF_ezScf48gVJNgMuB2KC-22tE84xLegIDgPaxd9gwJxJHMjyPZI5xSXaOOX71Z3BTBkfnM_L6tPrVx93b-ur92_e7V5e1VYIttTYc45Guh7FoKziTkjbGKl435aQUK0DVXqQzrm2UcwioOibXglUQ9Nwxy-rJ6e8pfK3FfOi9z5bnCYTsIyvW8klFa0oQn4S2hRzTjjoOfm9SQdNQR_J61H_Iq-P5DUwXcgX16Nz-rXfo_vrOaMugsdngcnWTEMywfr8R8doqxQDWXTPTzosMG48Jl3-B4NF51PBqF30_2nkxT9-O_ngS8mveMA8xjWFwllTnYtBfzguyXFHoAOgtAH-Ewt9vB0</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creator><creator>Applegate, Kimberly E</creator><creator>Rajesh, Arumugam</creator><creator>Jennings, S. Gregory</creator><creator>Ford, Jason M</creator><creator>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creator><creator>Lappas, John C</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</title><author>Maglinte, Dean D.T ; Applegate, Kimberly E ; Rajesh, Arumugam ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Ford, Jason M ; Savabi, Mojgan Sarah ; Lappas, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - methods</topic><topic>CT enteroclysis</topic><topic>Diazepam - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiologic sedation/analgesia</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maglinte, Dean D.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Kimberly E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajesh, Arumugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, S. Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maglinte, Dean D.T</au><au>Applegate, Kimberly E</au><au>Rajesh, Arumugam</au><au>Jennings, S. Gregory</au><au>Ford, Jason M</au><au>Savabi, Mojgan Sarah</au><au>Lappas, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>512-516</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><coden>EJRADR</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective To compare the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two regimens for conscious sedation during enteroclysis. Materials and methods We surveyed two groups of outpatients and retrospectively reviewed procedure records for conscious sedation and complications. Patients were divided into Group One (received sedative/amnesic diazepam), and Group Two, (received amnesic/sedative, midazolam and analgesic fentanyl). Results All enteroclyses were successfully completed; there were no hospital admissions due to complications. In Group One ( n = 106), mean dose of diazepam was 12.7 mg. 25% had oxygen desaturation ( n = 25), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 56% of outpatients completed phone surveys, and 68% recalled procedural discomfort. In Group Two ( n = 45), mean doses were 3.9 mg midazolam and 108 mcg fentanyl. 31% had desaturation ( n = 13), and post-procedure vomiting without aspiration ( n = 1). 87% had only a vague recall of the procedure or of any discomfort. Conclusion A combination of amnesic and fentanyl prevented the recall of discomfort of nasoenteric intubation and infusion in most patients who had enteroclysis compared to diazepam. Most of the patients would undergo the procedure again, if needed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18375082</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2009-06, Vol.70 (3), p.512-516
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67371464
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Conscious Sedation - methods
CT enteroclysis
Diazepam - administration & dosage
Digestive system
Female
Fentanyl - administration & dosage
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Intestines - diagnostic imaging
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Midazolam - administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Radiography
Radiologic sedation/analgesia
Radiology
Treatment Outcome
title Conscious sedation for patients undergoing enteroclysis: Comparing the safety and patient-reported effectiveness of two protocols
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A54%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conscious%20sedation%20for%20patients%20undergoing%20enteroclysis:%20Comparing%20the%20safety%20and%20patient-reported%20effectiveness%20of%20two%20protocols&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Maglinte,%20Dean%20D.T&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=512-516&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft.coden=EJRADR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67371464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-eb33ea7dbe4f9c93d47c5a793b6be4496d09afe7ddd6592ce0e4b5b94e9f553d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67371464&rft_id=info:pmid/18375082&rfr_iscdi=true