Variability in Nerve Patterns of the Adductor Muscle Group Supplied by the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve

• Published in: The Laryngoscope 2005-02, Vol.115 (2), p.358-362
• Main Authors: Maranillo, Eva, Leon, Xavier, Orus, Cesar, Quer, Miquel, Sanudo, Jose R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; arytenoid muscle; Biological and medical sciences; Dissection; Female; Humans; Laryngeal muscles; Laryngeal Muscles - innervation; laryngeal nerves; lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology; recurrent laryngeal nerve; Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve - anatomy & histology; thyroarytenoid muscle
• ISSN: 0023-852X; 1531-4995
• DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000154745.78808.02

Introduction: Accurate knowledge of the nerve supply of each individual muscle is needed to achieve a successful selective reinnervation of the larynx. The aim of the present work was to study the nerve supply of the adductor laryngeal muscles supplied by the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Study Design: Morphologic study of human larynges. Methods: The muscular nerve supply was studied in a total sample of 75 human larynges obtained from necropsies (47 males and 28 females, age range from 41–95 years) and examined by careful dissection using a surgical microscope. Results: The arytenoid muscle received one branch from each recurrent nerve. In 88% of cases, this branch arose in a common trunk with the upper branch of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle. In 8% of cases, the nerve for the arytenoid muscle also had a branch going to the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle. The arytenoid muscle also received from one to three pairs of branches from the posterior division of the internal laryngeal nerve; these were interconnected ipsi‐ and contralaterally and were also connected to the two branches coming from the recurrent laryngeal nerve. The lateral cricoarytenoid muscle received from one to six branches from the recurrent nerve, but in 5.8% of cases, it also received a twig from a connecting branch between the recurrent nerve and the external (5.6%) or the internal laryngeal nerves (0.2%). The thyroarytenoid muscle received from one to four branches from the recurrent nerve, but in 5.6% of cases, it also received a twig from a connecting branch between the recurrent nerve with the external (4.6%) or the internal (1%) laryngeal nerves. Conclusion: No abductor or adductor division of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was found in the present study. In 88% of cases, the nerve supply to the arytenoid muscle (adductor) and the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (abductor) arose from a common trunk, which in 8% of cases, also had a branch to the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle. Furthermore, the high incidence of branches innervating the adductor muscles from connections between the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the internal and external laryngeal nerves led us to reconsider the contribution of these nerves in the supply to this muscle group.