Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Study on the Tongue and Lingual Papillae of the Common Hippopotamus, Hippopotamus amphibius amphibius

• Published in: Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) N.J. : 2007), 2009-07, Vol.292 (7), p.921-934
• Main Authors: Yoshimura, Ken, Hama, Natsuki, Shindo, Junji, Kobayashi, Kan, Kageyama, Ikuo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Artiodactyla - anatomy & histology; Artiodactyla - physiology; Biological Evolution; cetartiodactyla; Classification; common hippopotamus; comparative anatomy; Epithelium - physiology; Epithelium - ultrastructure; Feeding Behavior - physiology; Female; Hippopotamus; Hippopotamus amphibius; lingual papillae; Male; Mastication - physiology; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Mouth Mucosa - physiology; Mouth Mucosa - ultrastructure; Phylogeny; Ruminantia; scanning electron microscopy; Species Specificity; Stomatognathic System - physiology; Stomatognathic System - ultrastructure; Taste - physiology; Taste Buds - physiology; Taste Buds - ultrastructure; Tongue - physiology; Tongue - ultrastructure
• ISSN: 1932-8486; 1932-8494
• DOI: 10.1002/ar.20915

We observed the three‐dimensional structures of the external surface and connective tissue cores CTCs, after exfoliation of the epithelium of the lingual papillae (filiform, fungiform, and foliate papillae) of the common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius amphibius) using scanning electron microscopy and conventional light microscopy. Following unique features were found; typical vallate papillae with a circumferential furrow were not observable. Instead, numerous large fungiform papillae were rather densely distributed on the posterior of the lingual prominence. Taste buds were observable only on the dorsal epithelium. Serous lingual gland was not seen in the lamina propria; however, mucous‐rich mixed lingual glands were found and in a few of orifices were seen on the large fungiform tops. Lingual prominence was diminished their width. Rather long and slender conical papillae were distributed on the lingual prominence and were similar to nonruminant herbivore, that is donkey. Beside this narrow lingual prominence, lateral slopes were situated with numerous short spine‐like protrusions. After removal of the epithelium, CTCs of lateral slopes exhibited attenuated flower bud structures. Large‐conical papillae were situated on the root of the tongue. These large conical papillae were not seen among ruminants and seen on the lingual root of omnivores and carnivores. It implies that lingual structure of common hippopotamus possessed mixed characteristics between Perissodactyls, Ruminantia, and nonherbivores such as Suiformes because of their unique evolutionally taxonomic position. Moreover, adaptation for soft grass diet and associating easier mastication may be also affecting these mixed morphological features of the tongue. Anat Rec, 292:921–934, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.