Loading…
Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments
Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top v...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic entomology 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 904 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 897 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Hooks, C.R.R Manandhar, R Perez, E. P Wang, K.-H Almeida, R.P.P |
description | Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (>90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1603/029.102.0306 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67498165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21165805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1v0zAYBnALgVgZu-0MvowDIt3rjzjxcas2QKrEYe20W2Qn9jBK7MxOhvrf46rVuIF8sPXqp0d-9SB0TmBJBLBLoHJJgC6BgXiFFkSyuqCSPLxGCwBKC-CSnaB3Kf0CIIISeItOiBQEOMACzaswjCqqyT0bfDen1oyT06530w4Hize_A75WPh-8mvuMVEx4epldz779ucObMOJ7F-eEt74zEa-VDjkyxB1WvsO3zvQdvvHPLgY_GD-l9-iNVX0yZ8f7FG1vbzarb8X6x9fvq6t1oTmvpqIE1VVUlKWWYEvTAStFRa3ltqPAKmMYtVLWtuUgqdVaM6qksZQIXbe0VewUfTrkjjE8zSZNzeDyin2vvAlzakTFZU1E-V9ISVY17OGXA2xjSCka24zRDSruGgLNvo8m95HftNn3kfmHY-6sB9P9xccCMrg4ApVa1duofOvSi8urcMEZy-7jwVkVGvUYs9neUSAsd8qqWtRZfD4I7ULw5t__-gNCc6jm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21165805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><description>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (>90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19610400</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Aphididae ; Aphids - virology ; ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE ; Babuvirus - physiology ; Banana bunchy top virus ; bananas ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bunchy top ; Canopies ; Chlorophyll ; Control ; cultivars ; disease incidence ; disease resistance ; Disease transmission ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Hawaii ; Hemiptera ; Host-Pathogen Interactions ; incubation period ; Infection ; Inoculation ; insect vectors ; Islands ; Leaf area ; Malus ; Musa ; Musa - virology ; Musa sp ; Nanoviridae ; Pentalonia nigronervosa ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant diseases ; Plant Diseases - virology ; plant viruses ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; resistance ; Species Specificity ; Time Factors ; varietal resistance ; Vectors ; virus transmission</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904</ispartof><rights>2009 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21646433$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19610400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, E. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (>90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Aphids - virology</subject><subject>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</subject><subject>Babuvirus - physiology</subject><subject>Banana bunchy top virus</subject><subject>bananas</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bunchy top</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>disease incidence</subject><subject>disease resistance</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Hawaii</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>Host-Pathogen Interactions</subject><subject>incubation period</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>insect vectors</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Musa</subject><subject>Musa - virology</subject><subject>Musa sp</subject><subject>Nanoviridae</subject><subject>Pentalonia nigronervosa</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - virology</subject><subject>plant viruses</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>varietal resistance</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>virus transmission</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1v0zAYBnALgVgZu-0MvowDIt3rjzjxcas2QKrEYe20W2Qn9jBK7MxOhvrf46rVuIF8sPXqp0d-9SB0TmBJBLBLoHJJgC6BgXiFFkSyuqCSPLxGCwBKC-CSnaB3Kf0CIIISeItOiBQEOMACzaswjCqqyT0bfDen1oyT06530w4Hize_A75WPh-8mvuMVEx4epldz779ucObMOJ7F-eEt74zEa-VDjkyxB1WvsO3zvQdvvHPLgY_GD-l9-iNVX0yZ8f7FG1vbzarb8X6x9fvq6t1oTmvpqIE1VVUlKWWYEvTAStFRa3ltqPAKmMYtVLWtuUgqdVaM6qksZQIXbe0VewUfTrkjjE8zSZNzeDyin2vvAlzakTFZU1E-V9ISVY17OGXA2xjSCka24zRDSruGgLNvo8m95HftNn3kfmHY-6sB9P9xccCMrg4ApVa1duofOvSi8urcMEZy-7jwVkVGvUYs9neUSAsd8qqWtRZfD4I7ULw5t__-gNCc6jm</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Hooks, C.R.R</creator><creator>Manandhar, R</creator><creator>Perez, E. P</creator><creator>Wang, K.-H</creator><creator>Almeida, R.P.P</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><author>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Aphids - virology</topic><topic>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</topic><topic>Babuvirus - physiology</topic><topic>Banana bunchy top virus</topic><topic>bananas</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bunchy top</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>disease incidence</topic><topic>disease resistance</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Hawaii</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>Host-Pathogen Interactions</topic><topic>incubation period</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>insect vectors</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Musa</topic><topic>Musa - virology</topic><topic>Musa sp</topic><topic>Nanoviridae</topic><topic>Pentalonia nigronervosa</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - virology</topic><topic>plant viruses</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>varietal resistance</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>virus transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, E. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooks, C.R.R</au><au>Manandhar, R</au><au>Perez, E. P</au><au>Wang, K.-H</au><au>Almeida, R.P.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>904</epage><pages>897-904</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (>90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>19610400</pmid><doi>10.1603/029.102.0306</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X 0022-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67498165 |
source | Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list) |
subjects | Agriculture - methods Analysis of Variance Animals Aphididae Aphids - virology ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE Babuvirus - physiology Banana bunchy top virus bananas Biological and medical sciences Bunchy top Canopies Chlorophyll Control cultivars disease incidence disease resistance Disease transmission Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities Hawaii Hemiptera Host-Pathogen Interactions incubation period Infection Inoculation insect vectors Islands Leaf area Malus Musa Musa - virology Musa sp Nanoviridae Pentalonia nigronervosa Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant diseases Plant Diseases - virology plant viruses Protozoa. Invertebrates resistance Species Specificity Time Factors varietal resistance Vectors virus transmission |
title | Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Susceptibility%20of%20Two%20Banana%20Cultivars%20to%20Banana%20Bunchy%20Top%20Virus%20Under%20Laboratory%20and%20Field%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Hooks,%20C.R.R&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=904&rft.pages=897-904&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/029.102.0306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21165805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21165805&rft_id=info:pmid/19610400&rfr_iscdi=true |