Loading…

Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments

Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic entomology 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904
Main Authors: Hooks, C.R.R, Manandhar, R, Perez, E. P, Wang, K.-H, Almeida, R.P.P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3
cites
container_end_page 904
container_issue 3
container_start_page 897
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 102
creator Hooks, C.R.R
Manandhar, R
Perez, E. P
Wang, K.-H
Almeida, R.P.P
description Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (>90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/029.102.0306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67498165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21165805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1v0zAYBnALgVgZu-0MvowDIt3rjzjxcas2QKrEYe20W2Qn9jBK7MxOhvrf46rVuIF8sPXqp0d-9SB0TmBJBLBLoHJJgC6BgXiFFkSyuqCSPLxGCwBKC-CSnaB3Kf0CIIISeItOiBQEOMACzaswjCqqyT0bfDen1oyT06530w4Hize_A75WPh-8mvuMVEx4epldz779ucObMOJ7F-eEt74zEa-VDjkyxB1WvsO3zvQdvvHPLgY_GD-l9-iNVX0yZ8f7FG1vbzarb8X6x9fvq6t1oTmvpqIE1VVUlKWWYEvTAStFRa3ltqPAKmMYtVLWtuUgqdVaM6qksZQIXbe0VewUfTrkjjE8zSZNzeDyin2vvAlzakTFZU1E-V9ISVY17OGXA2xjSCka24zRDSruGgLNvo8m95HftNn3kfmHY-6sB9P9xccCMrg4ApVa1duofOvSi8urcMEZy-7jwVkVGvUYs9neUSAsd8qqWtRZfD4I7ULw5t__-gNCc6jm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21165805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><description>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (&gt;90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19610400</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Aphididae ; Aphids - virology ; ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE ; Babuvirus - physiology ; Banana bunchy top virus ; bananas ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bunchy top ; Canopies ; Chlorophyll ; Control ; cultivars ; disease incidence ; disease resistance ; Disease transmission ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Hawaii ; Hemiptera ; Host-Pathogen Interactions ; incubation period ; Infection ; Inoculation ; insect vectors ; Islands ; Leaf area ; Malus ; Musa ; Musa - virology ; Musa sp ; Nanoviridae ; Pentalonia nigronervosa ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant diseases ; Plant Diseases - virology ; plant viruses ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; resistance ; Species Specificity ; Time Factors ; varietal resistance ; Vectors ; virus transmission</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904</ispartof><rights>2009 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21646433$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19610400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, E. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (&gt;90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Aphids - virology</subject><subject>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</subject><subject>Babuvirus - physiology</subject><subject>Banana bunchy top virus</subject><subject>bananas</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bunchy top</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>disease incidence</subject><subject>disease resistance</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Hawaii</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>Host-Pathogen Interactions</subject><subject>incubation period</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>insect vectors</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Musa</subject><subject>Musa - virology</subject><subject>Musa sp</subject><subject>Nanoviridae</subject><subject>Pentalonia nigronervosa</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - virology</subject><subject>plant viruses</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>varietal resistance</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>virus transmission</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1v0zAYBnALgVgZu-0MvowDIt3rjzjxcas2QKrEYe20W2Qn9jBK7MxOhvrf46rVuIF8sPXqp0d-9SB0TmBJBLBLoHJJgC6BgXiFFkSyuqCSPLxGCwBKC-CSnaB3Kf0CIIISeItOiBQEOMACzaswjCqqyT0bfDen1oyT06530w4Hize_A75WPh-8mvuMVEx4epldz779ucObMOJ7F-eEt74zEa-VDjkyxB1WvsO3zvQdvvHPLgY_GD-l9-iNVX0yZ8f7FG1vbzarb8X6x9fvq6t1oTmvpqIE1VVUlKWWYEvTAStFRa3ltqPAKmMYtVLWtuUgqdVaM6qksZQIXbe0VewUfTrkjjE8zSZNzeDyin2vvAlzakTFZU1E-V9ISVY17OGXA2xjSCka24zRDSruGgLNvo8m95HftNn3kfmHY-6sB9P9xccCMrg4ApVa1duofOvSi8urcMEZy-7jwVkVGvUYs9neUSAsd8qqWtRZfD4I7ULw5t__-gNCc6jm</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Hooks, C.R.R</creator><creator>Manandhar, R</creator><creator>Perez, E. P</creator><creator>Wang, K.-H</creator><creator>Almeida, R.P.P</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</title><author>Hooks, C.R.R ; Manandhar, R ; Perez, E. P ; Wang, K.-H ; Almeida, R.P.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Aphids - virology</topic><topic>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</topic><topic>Babuvirus - physiology</topic><topic>Banana bunchy top virus</topic><topic>bananas</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bunchy top</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>disease incidence</topic><topic>disease resistance</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Hawaii</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>Host-Pathogen Interactions</topic><topic>incubation period</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>insect vectors</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Musa</topic><topic>Musa - virology</topic><topic>Musa sp</topic><topic>Nanoviridae</topic><topic>Pentalonia nigronervosa</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - virology</topic><topic>plant viruses</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>varietal resistance</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>virus transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C.R.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, E. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, R.P.P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooks, C.R.R</au><au>Manandhar, R</au><au>Perez, E. P</au><au>Wang, K.-H</au><au>Almeida, R.P.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>904</epage><pages>897-904</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>Field and laboratory experiments were carried out on the island of Oahu, HI, to compare the susceptibility of the two most commonly grown banana (Musa sp.) cultivars in the state (‘Dwarf Brazilian’or Santa Catarina [locally known as dwarf apple] and ‘Williams’) to the aphid-borne Banana bunchy top virus (genus Babuvirus, family Nanoviridae, BBTV). Several morphological and physiological features of the two cultivars were monitored to determine whether the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), transmits BBTV to both cultivars at a similar rate; and whether after successful inoculation, does each cultivar respond similarly to viral infection. Results from the laboratory experiment showed that a similar percentage of both cultivars were infected with BBTV by aphid vectors (&gt;90% for both cultivars). However, field results showed a significantly lower percentage of dwarf apple (39%) infected with BBTV compared with Williams (79%). We also found that all physiological and morphological features measured (i.e., plant height, leaf area, canopy, chlorophyll level, and moisture content) for both cultivars were impacted similarly by BBTV. The incubation period, or the time between plant infection and initial appearance of disease symptoms, was similar for both cultivars. Results also showed that BBTV transmission efficiency was lower in the field than in the laboratory, despite that more aphids per plant were used for field than laboratory inoculation tests. The results highlight the potential use of less susceptible cultivars to help manage BBTV and the importance of screening banana varieties in the field to determine their response to vectors and associated diseases.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>19610400</pmid><doi>10.1603/029.102.0306</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2009-06, Vol.102 (3), p.897-904
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
0022-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67498165
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Agriculture - methods
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Aphididae
Aphids - virology
ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE
Babuvirus - physiology
Banana bunchy top virus
bananas
Biological and medical sciences
Bunchy top
Canopies
Chlorophyll
Control
cultivars
disease incidence
disease resistance
Disease transmission
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities
Hawaii
Hemiptera
Host-Pathogen Interactions
incubation period
Infection
Inoculation
insect vectors
Islands
Leaf area
Malus
Musa
Musa - virology
Musa sp
Nanoviridae
Pentalonia nigronervosa
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant diseases
Plant Diseases - virology
plant viruses
Protozoa. Invertebrates
resistance
Species Specificity
Time Factors
varietal resistance
Vectors
virus transmission
title Comparative Susceptibility of Two Banana Cultivars to Banana Bunchy Top Virus Under Laboratory and Field Environments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Susceptibility%20of%20Two%20Banana%20Cultivars%20to%20Banana%20Bunchy%20Top%20Virus%20Under%20Laboratory%20and%20Field%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Hooks,%20C.R.R&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=904&rft.pages=897-904&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/029.102.0306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21165805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-50ad72655b90f5ed035672ff4fd2037ee32f998fc4092fbbb32a9ef216b8c2ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21165805&rft_id=info:pmid/19610400&rfr_iscdi=true