Loading…
Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences?
Abstract Background Breast conservation is possible in breast cancer patients whose mammographic lesions are large enough to require multiple localizing wires for excision. Methods A retrospective review of 112 patients who underwent multiple-wire and 160 controls who underwent single-wire lumpectom...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2009-09, Vol.198 (3), p.368-372 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3 |
container_end_page | 372 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Javid, Sara H., M.D Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD Moore, Richard, AB Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D Murphy, Colleen D., M.D Hughes, Kevin S., M.D Specht, Michelle C., M.D Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D |
description | Abstract Background Breast conservation is possible in breast cancer patients whose mammographic lesions are large enough to require multiple localizing wires for excision. Methods A retrospective review of 112 patients who underwent multiple-wire and 160 controls who underwent single-wire lumpectomy for breast cancer. Rates of in-breast recurrence, metastasis, and additional imaging and biopsy procedures were calculated. Results The median follow-up was 24 months. One multiple-wire and 2 single-wire patients developed in-breast recurrences ( P = .84). No distant metastases developed among the multiple-wire patients. Additional follow-up imaging was obtained in 29% of multiple-wire and 22% of single-wire cases ( P = .1). Seven (6%) of the multiple-wire and 11 (6%) of the single-wire cases underwent biopsy ( P = .94). Conclusions We found no increased risk of early local recurrence, metastasis, or additional imaging or biopsies in patients requiring multiple-wire localization for lumpectomy. Breast conservation should be considered a safe option even for patients with mammographically extensive lesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.021 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67621790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002961009002037</els_id><sourcerecordid>1924858823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4AsIVg1F4_z53RBhSr-pEpdAGvLsSdXvjjxxZOAylPwyDjcqJW6YWVb-s7xzJzJsufAt8ChfrPf6mFPc9xtBeftlsOWC3iQbUA2bQ5SFg-zDedc5G0N_CR7QrRPT4CyeJydQNtALWW5yf5cz5MJA7LQs2H2kzt4zH-5iMwHo737rScXRtaHyLyOO4ysi6hpYkaPBiOdMxtuhWwREpuiHsnrCZkbp8C0tW4x0Z65Qe_cuDtjnQsHckhnTI-WRTRzjJgM6eJp9qjXnvDZep5m3z68_3r5Kb-6_vj58t1VbsqmnnIoZF9z5B3UtsdOlxZFWRkt205obUveA7aFsRpEU0mseq6LsiplXyJYKG1xmr0--h5i-DEjTWpwZNB7PWKYSdVNLaBpeQJf3gP3YY6pG1LQilJWUooiUdWRMjEQRezVIaZu440CrpbA1F6tgaklMMVBpcCS7sXqPncD2jvVmlACXq2AphRIn2ZrHN1yAloA-MddHDlMQ_vpMCoybhmpTZmYSdng_lvK23sOxrvRpU-_4w3SXdeKhOLqy7Jdy3LxNl140RR_ARaXzmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924858823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Javid, Sara H., M.D ; Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D ; Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D ; Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD ; Moore, Richard, AB ; Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D ; Murphy, Colleen D., M.D ; Hughes, Kevin S., M.D ; Specht, Michelle C., M.D ; Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D ; Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Javid, Sara H., M.D ; Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D ; Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D ; Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD ; Moore, Richard, AB ; Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D ; Murphy, Colleen D., M.D ; Hughes, Kevin S., M.D ; Specht, Michelle C., M.D ; Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D ; Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Breast conservation is possible in breast cancer patients whose mammographic lesions are large enough to require multiple localizing wires for excision. Methods A retrospective review of 112 patients who underwent multiple-wire and 160 controls who underwent single-wire lumpectomy for breast cancer. Rates of in-breast recurrence, metastasis, and additional imaging and biopsy procedures were calculated. Results The median follow-up was 24 months. One multiple-wire and 2 single-wire patients developed in-breast recurrences ( P = .84). No distant metastases developed among the multiple-wire patients. Additional follow-up imaging was obtained in 29% of multiple-wire and 22% of single-wire cases ( P = .1). Seven (6%) of the multiple-wire and 11 (6%) of the single-wire cases underwent biopsy ( P = .94). Conclusions We found no increased risk of early local recurrence, metastasis, or additional imaging or biopsies in patients requiring multiple-wire localization for lumpectomy. Breast conservation should be considered a safe option even for patients with mammographically extensive lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19716884</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breasts ; Cancer ; Female ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lesions ; Local recurrence ; Localization ; Lumpectomy ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Mastectomy ; Mastectomy, Segmental - instrumentation ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Medical sciences ; Metastases ; Middle Aged ; Multiple wire localization ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Patients ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Wire</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2009-09, Vol.198 (3), p.368-372</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 1, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21911184$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Javid, Sara H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard, AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colleen D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Kevin S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Michelle C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences?</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Breast conservation is possible in breast cancer patients whose mammographic lesions are large enough to require multiple localizing wires for excision. Methods A retrospective review of 112 patients who underwent multiple-wire and 160 controls who underwent single-wire lumpectomy for breast cancer. Rates of in-breast recurrence, metastasis, and additional imaging and biopsy procedures were calculated. Results The median follow-up was 24 months. One multiple-wire and 2 single-wire patients developed in-breast recurrences ( P = .84). No distant metastases developed among the multiple-wire patients. Additional follow-up imaging was obtained in 29% of multiple-wire and 22% of single-wire cases ( P = .1). Seven (6%) of the multiple-wire and 11 (6%) of the single-wire cases underwent biopsy ( P = .94). Conclusions We found no increased risk of early local recurrence, metastasis, or additional imaging or biopsies in patients requiring multiple-wire localization for lumpectomy. Breast conservation should be considered a safe option even for patients with mammographically extensive lesions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breasts</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Local recurrence</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple wire localization</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4AsIVg1F4_z53RBhSr-pEpdAGvLsSdXvjjxxZOAylPwyDjcqJW6YWVb-s7xzJzJsufAt8ChfrPf6mFPc9xtBeftlsOWC3iQbUA2bQ5SFg-zDedc5G0N_CR7QrRPT4CyeJydQNtALWW5yf5cz5MJA7LQs2H2kzt4zH-5iMwHo737rScXRtaHyLyOO4ysi6hpYkaPBiOdMxtuhWwREpuiHsnrCZkbp8C0tW4x0Z65Qe_cuDtjnQsHckhnTI-WRTRzjJgM6eJp9qjXnvDZep5m3z68_3r5Kb-6_vj58t1VbsqmnnIoZF9z5B3UtsdOlxZFWRkt205obUveA7aFsRpEU0mseq6LsiplXyJYKG1xmr0--h5i-DEjTWpwZNB7PWKYSdVNLaBpeQJf3gP3YY6pG1LQilJWUooiUdWRMjEQRezVIaZu440CrpbA1F6tgaklMMVBpcCS7sXqPncD2jvVmlACXq2AphRIn2ZrHN1yAloA-MddHDlMQ_vpMCoybhmpTZmYSdng_lvK23sOxrvRpU-_4w3SXdeKhOLqy7Jdy3LxNl140RR_ARaXzmw</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Javid, Sara H., M.D</creator><creator>Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D</creator><creator>Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D</creator><creator>Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD</creator><creator>Moore, Richard, AB</creator><creator>Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D</creator><creator>Murphy, Colleen D., M.D</creator><creator>Hughes, Kevin S., M.D</creator><creator>Specht, Michelle C., M.D</creator><creator>Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences?</title><author>Javid, Sara H., M.D ; Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D ; Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D ; Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD ; Moore, Richard, AB ; Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D ; Murphy, Colleen D., M.D ; Hughes, Kevin S., M.D ; Specht, Michelle C., M.D ; Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D ; Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breasts</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Local recurrence</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple wire localization</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Javid, Sara H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard, AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colleen D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Kevin S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Michelle C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Javid, Sara H., M.D</au><au>Kirstein, Laurie J., M.D</au><au>Rafferty, Elizabeth, M.D</au><au>Lipsitz, Stuart, ScD</au><au>Moore, Richard, AB</au><au>Rusby, Jennifer E., M.D</au><au>Murphy, Colleen D., M.D</au><au>Hughes, Kevin S., M.D</au><au>Specht, Michelle C., M.D</au><au>Taghian, Alphonse G., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Smith, Barbara L., M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>368-372</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Breast conservation is possible in breast cancer patients whose mammographic lesions are large enough to require multiple localizing wires for excision. Methods A retrospective review of 112 patients who underwent multiple-wire and 160 controls who underwent single-wire lumpectomy for breast cancer. Rates of in-breast recurrence, metastasis, and additional imaging and biopsy procedures were calculated. Results The median follow-up was 24 months. One multiple-wire and 2 single-wire patients developed in-breast recurrences ( P = .84). No distant metastases developed among the multiple-wire patients. Additional follow-up imaging was obtained in 29% of multiple-wire and 22% of single-wire cases ( P = .1). Seven (6%) of the multiple-wire and 11 (6%) of the single-wire cases underwent biopsy ( P = .94). Conclusions We found no increased risk of early local recurrence, metastasis, or additional imaging or biopsies in patients requiring multiple-wire localization for lumpectomy. Breast conservation should be considered a safe option even for patients with mammographically extensive lesions.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19716884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.021</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2009-09, Vol.198 (3), p.368-372 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67621790 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breasts Cancer Female General aspects Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Imaging Lesions Local recurrence Localization Lumpectomy Mammary gland diseases Mammography Mastectomy Mastectomy, Segmental - instrumentation Mastectomy, Segmental - methods Medical sciences Metastases Middle Aged Multiple wire localization Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Patients Radiography Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome Tumors Wire |
title | Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20multiple-wire%20localization%20for%20larger%20breast%20cancers:%20do%20multiple%20wires%20translate%20into%20additional%20imaging,%20biopsies,%20and%20recurrences?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Javid,%20Sara%20H.,%20M.D&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=368-372&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924858823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-138f60e0b16dfeba4de245ca89b2aad40f1e93cda12758e5f0a34548f4e1d14d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924858823&rft_id=info:pmid/19716884&rfr_iscdi=true |