Loading…
Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?
Microglia, the standby cells for immune defense in the CNS, have a reputation for exacerbating the neural damage that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases. However, research over the past few years has established that microglia do not constitute a single, uniform cell population, but rather compris...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.) 2006-02, Vol.29 (2), p.68-74 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03 |
container_end_page | 74 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Schwartz, Michal Butovsky, Oleg Brück, Wolfgang Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten |
description | Microglia, the standby cells for immune defense in the CNS, have a reputation for exacerbating the neural damage that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases. However, research over the past few years has established that microglia do not constitute a single, uniform cell population, but rather comprise a family of cells with diverse phenotypes – some that are beneficial and others that the CNS can barely tolerate and that are therefore destructive. This finding raised several questions. What instructs microglia to acquire a particular phenotype, and how do these phenotypes differ? How committed are microglia to a specific phenotype? Can destructive microglia become protective, and can protective microglia retain their beneficial phenotype even when they encounter a destructive environment? Here, we address these questions, and the background of research that elicited them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tins.2005.12.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67655238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166223605003231</els_id><sourcerecordid>67655238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EuLFDEUBeAgitMz-gdcSCE4uyrvTSo3VTIgMviCETcK7kIqdctJU482qR6Yf2-abhhwoauz-e4hOUK8QKgQkN5sqzXMqZIAukJZ5XgkNtiYpkRofj4Wm4yolFLRmThPaQuAdYP1U3GGVANBqzZCfQ0-Lr_G4MZid8vzst7v-G0RUrHecuGXaQrrxPNaRL7jmEI38rtn4sngxsTPT3khfnz88P36c3nz7dOX6_c3pdfQrGXvqG6JWXcwdOSoNw4MDEZK6lsEhX0OVQ_OdF6S0aAdKOk11sqT7EBdiMtj7y4uv_ecVjuF5Hkc3czLPlkypLVUzX8hGmgNkM7w1V9wu-zjnD9hJTbUNrWkjOQR5WFSijzYXQyTi_cWwR6Gt1t7GN4ehrcobY589PLUvO8m7h9OTktn8PoEXPJuHKKbfUgPzmjMfXV2V0fHedm7wNEmH3j23IfIfrX9Ev71jj_xlJ8G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218698426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schwartz, Michal ; Butovsky, Oleg ; Brück, Wolfgang ; Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michal ; Butovsky, Oleg ; Brück, Wolfgang ; Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</creatorcontrib><description>Microglia, the standby cells for immune defense in the CNS, have a reputation for exacerbating the neural damage that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases. However, research over the past few years has established that microglia do not constitute a single, uniform cell population, but rather comprise a family of cells with diverse phenotypes – some that are beneficial and others that the CNS can barely tolerate and that are therefore destructive. This finding raised several questions. What instructs microglia to acquire a particular phenotype, and how do these phenotypes differ? How committed are microglia to a specific phenotype? Can destructive microglia become protective, and can protective microglia retain their beneficial phenotype even when they encounter a destructive environment? Here, we address these questions, and the background of research that elicited them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-2236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2005.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16406093</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TNSCDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cells ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotype & phenotype ; Humans ; Immune system ; Inflammation - pathology ; Isolated neuron and nerve. Neuroglia ; Microglia - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Phenotype ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.), 2006-02, Vol.29 (2), p.68-74</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17512004$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16406093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butovsky, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brück, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</creatorcontrib><title>Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?</title><title>Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.)</title><addtitle>Trends Neurosci</addtitle><description>Microglia, the standby cells for immune defense in the CNS, have a reputation for exacerbating the neural damage that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases. However, research over the past few years has established that microglia do not constitute a single, uniform cell population, but rather comprise a family of cells with diverse phenotypes – some that are beneficial and others that the CNS can barely tolerate and that are therefore destructive. This finding raised several questions. What instructs microglia to acquire a particular phenotype, and how do these phenotypes differ? How committed are microglia to a specific phenotype? Can destructive microglia become protective, and can protective microglia retain their beneficial phenotype even when they encounter a destructive environment? Here, we address these questions, and the background of research that elicited them.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Inflammation - pathology</subject><subject>Isolated neuron and nerve. Neuroglia</subject><subject>Microglia - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0166-2236</issn><issn>1878-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0EuLFDEUBeAgitMz-gdcSCE4uyrvTSo3VTIgMviCETcK7kIqdctJU482qR6Yf2-abhhwoauz-e4hOUK8QKgQkN5sqzXMqZIAukJZ5XgkNtiYpkRofj4Wm4yolFLRmThPaQuAdYP1U3GGVANBqzZCfQ0-Lr_G4MZid8vzst7v-G0RUrHecuGXaQrrxPNaRL7jmEI38rtn4sngxsTPT3khfnz88P36c3nz7dOX6_c3pdfQrGXvqG6JWXcwdOSoNw4MDEZK6lsEhX0OVQ_OdF6S0aAdKOk11sqT7EBdiMtj7y4uv_ecVjuF5Hkc3czLPlkypLVUzX8hGmgNkM7w1V9wu-zjnD9hJTbUNrWkjOQR5WFSijzYXQyTi_cWwR6Gt1t7GN4ehrcobY589PLUvO8m7h9OTktn8PoEXPJuHKKbfUgPzmjMfXV2V0fHedm7wNEmH3j23IfIfrX9Ev71jj_xlJ8G</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Michal</creator><creator>Butovsky, Oleg</creator><creator>Brück, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?</title><author>Schwartz, Michal ; Butovsky, Oleg ; Brück, Wolfgang ; Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Inflammation - pathology</topic><topic>Isolated neuron and nerve. Neuroglia</topic><topic>Microglia - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butovsky, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brück, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Michal</au><au>Butovsky, Oleg</au><au>Brück, Wolfgang</au><au>Hanisch, Uwe-Karsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible?</atitle><jtitle>Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Neurosci</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>68-74</pages><issn>0166-2236</issn><eissn>1878-108X</eissn><coden>TNSCDR</coden><abstract>Microglia, the standby cells for immune defense in the CNS, have a reputation for exacerbating the neural damage that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases. However, research over the past few years has established that microglia do not constitute a single, uniform cell population, but rather comprise a family of cells with diverse phenotypes – some that are beneficial and others that the CNS can barely tolerate and that are therefore destructive. This finding raised several questions. What instructs microglia to acquire a particular phenotype, and how do these phenotypes differ? How committed are microglia to a specific phenotype? Can destructive microglia become protective, and can protective microglia retain their beneficial phenotype even when they encounter a destructive environment? Here, we address these questions, and the background of research that elicited them.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16406093</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tins.2005.12.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-2236 |
ispartof | Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.), 2006-02, Vol.29 (2), p.68-74 |
issn | 0166-2236 1878-108X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67655238 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cells Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genotype & phenotype Humans Immune system Inflammation - pathology Isolated neuron and nerve. Neuroglia Microglia - physiology Neurosciences Phenotype Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Microglial phenotype: is the commitment reversible? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microglial%20phenotype:%20is%20the%20commitment%20reversible?&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20neurosciences%20(Regular%20ed.)&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Michal&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=68-74&rft.issn=0166-2236&rft.eissn=1878-108X&rft.coden=TNSCDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tins.2005.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67655238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-da6496ee5b0fb6a6d7a070f7226d91031dd9134fa7bc267505a032c5143c62b03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218698426&rft_id=info:pmid/16406093&rfr_iscdi=true |