Loading…

Outcomes, health policy, and managed care: Relationships between patient-reported outcome measures and clinical measures in outpatients with heart failure

Background Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used to assess the efficacy of new treatments. Understanding relationships between these and clinical measures can facilitate their interpretation. We examined associations between patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American heart journal 2009-10, Vol.158 (4), p.S64-S71
Main Authors: Flynn, Kathryn E., PhD, Lin, Li, MS, Ellis, Stephen J., PhD, Russell, Stuart D., MD, Spertus, John A., MD, MPH, Whellan, David J., MD, MHS, Piña, Ileana L., MD, Fine, Lawrence J., MD, DrPH, Schulman, Kevin A., MD, Weinfurt, Kevin P., PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used to assess the efficacy of new treatments. Understanding relationships between these and clinical measures can facilitate their interpretation. We examined associations between patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life and clinical indicators of disease severity in a large, heterogeneous sample of patients with heart failure. Methods Patient-reported measures, including the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and clinical measures, including peak V o2 , 6-minute walk distance, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, were assessed at baseline in 2331 patients with heart failure. We used general linear models to regress patient-reported measures on each clinical measure. Final models included for significant sociodemographic variables and 2-way interactions. Results The KCCQ was correlated with peak V o2 ( r = .21) and 6-minute walk distance ( r = .27). The VAS was correlated with peak V o2 ( r = .09) and 6-minute walk distance ( r = .11). Using the KCCQ as the response variable, a 1-SD difference in peak V o2 (4.7 mL/kg/min) was associated with a 2.86-point difference in the VAS (95% CI, 1.98-3.74) and a 4.75-point difference in the KCCQ (95% CI, 3.78-5.72). A 1-SD difference in 6-minute walk distance (105 m) was associated with a 2.78-point difference in the VAS (95% CI, 1.92-3.64) and a 5.92-point difference in the KCCQ (95% CI, 4.98-6.87); NYHA class III was associated with an 8.26-point lower VAS (95% CI, 6.59-9.93) and a 12.73-point lower KCCQ (95% CI, 10.92-14.53) than NYHA class II. Conclusions These data may inform deliberations about how to best measure benefits of heart failure interventions, and they generally support the practice of considering a 5-point difference on the KCCQ and a 3-point difference on the VAS to be clinically meaningful.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.010