Loading…

Bacteriologic features of surgical site infections following breast surgery

Abstract Background Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) after breast surgery is common practice. Breast SSIs were investigated to determine bacterial isolates, resistance patterns, and the appropriateness of cefazolin, the authors' institution's...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2009-10, Vol.198 (4), p.529-531
Main Authors: Mukhtar, Rita A., M.D, Throckmorton, Alyssa D., M.D, Alvarado, Michael D., M.D, Ewing, Cheryl A., M.D, Esserman, Laura J., M.D., M.B.A, Chiu, Charles, M.D., Ph.D, Hwang, E. Shelley, M.D., M.P.H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) after breast surgery is common practice. Breast SSIs were investigated to determine bacterial isolates, resistance patterns, and the appropriateness of cefazolin, the authors' institution's current regimen for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods A retrospective review of 53 patients with culture-positive breast SSIs between June 1997 and August 2008 identified patient characteristics, bacterial isolates, and microbial resistance patterns. Results Among the 53 patients with positive cultures, 42% (n = 22) had undergone mastectomy, and 34% (n = 18) had undergone lumpectomy. Sixty-three bacterial isolates were identified, with 15% of SSIs being polymicrobial. Of the isolates, 49% (n = 31) were gram-negative bacteria. There was only 1 case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Eight of 63 (13%) gram-negative isolates were cefazolin resistant. Conclusions Gram-negative SSIs constituted half of the SSIs in this breast surgery cohort. Of all breast isolates, 17.5% were resistant to cefazolin. On the basis of these findings, antibiotic prophylaxis regimens alternative to cefazolin should be considered.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.006