Neighborhood Deprivation, Individual Socioeconomic Status, and Frailty in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES: To assess how individual socioeconomic status and neighborhood deprivation affect frailty. DESIGN: Nationally representative population‐based study, the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), analyzed cross‐sectionally. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand eight hundred eighteen individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2009-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1776-1780
Main Authors: Lang, Iain A., Hubbard, Ruth E., Andrew, Melissa K., Llewellyn, David J., Melzer, David, Rockwood, Kenneth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Frail Elderly
Frailty
General aspects
Health risk assessment
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
neighborhood deprivation
Neighborhoods
Older people
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Residence Characteristics
Social Isolation
Socioeconomic Factors
socioeconomic status
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVES: To assess how individual socioeconomic status and neighborhood deprivation affect frailty. DESIGN: Nationally representative population‐based study, the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), analyzed cross‐sectionally. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand eight hundred eighteen individuals aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome was a frailty index (FI), based on 58 potential deficits, with a theoretical range from 0 to 1; exposures were individual wealth and neighborhood deprivation (lack of local resources, financial and otherwise), based on a set of standard indicators. RESULTS: The FI score varied independently according to wealth and neighborhood deprivation. The mean FI score for an individual in the highest 20% of wealth and least deprived 20% of neighborhoods was 0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.09–0.09) and for an individual in the lowest 20% of wealth and most deprived 20% of neighborhoods was 0.17 (95% CI=0.16–0.17). CONCLUSION: Frailty in older adults is independently associated with individual and neighborhood socioeconomic factors. Older adults who are poor and live in deprived neighborhoods are most vulnerable. Policies and interventions intended to prevent or reduce frailty must take into account individual circumstances and the broader social settings in which individuals are located.
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02480.x