Loading…
Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda
This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political phi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The British journal of sociology 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43 |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The British journal of sociology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Beck, Ulrich Sznaider, Natan |
description | This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67700980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38217339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshiwW4G3_H4D4kFtLSAKioEhaV1x_G0TmfGwU5E-vY4JCoSm-CNfe3vHMnnEEKB1VDWq0UNrdRV27aybhiTNWPMQL15QGb3Dw_JrNyqCjiII_Ik50UZm0bIx-QIpGDSmHZGTq-mJbrbMF1TF_MYl3EIK5xCHmkfE13deJqjCzjQ7IKfnM-vKdLks8fkbihe-2mOT8mjHofsn-33Y3J19v7byYfq4vL848nbi8oJA1D1Zi6Vx67l3AjUynWKGemgkdow0Ym50AIYNx120CAzXd-j6ICj8k5p1_Jj8nLnu0zx59rnlR1Ddn4YcPJxna1UquSg2WGwRAGNgIOgUKAaadRBkOsGVPlXAV_8Ay7iOk0lFgtGSyM54wXSO8ilmHPyvV2mMGK6s8DstmG7sNsi7bZIu23Y_mnYbor0-d5_3Y1-_le4r7QAb3bArzD4u_82tu8-XX4tp6KvdvqQV35zr8d0W_LlStgfn8_tl1adMam-21P-G7powTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198696303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><description>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1315</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1468-4446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16506994</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOSAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cosmopolitanism ; Globalization ; Humanities ; Humans ; International relations ; Internationality ; methodological cosmopolitanism ; methodological nationalism ; Methodology ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Nationalism ; Paradigms ; Politics ; Social Sciences ; Social Theories ; Social theory ; Sociology ; Studies ; System theory ; Theory ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>The British journal of sociology, 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>London School of Economics and Political Science 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33202,33203,33753,33754</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16506994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><title>The British journal of sociology</title><addtitle>Br J Sociol</addtitle><description>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</description><subject>Cosmopolitanism</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>methodological cosmopolitanism</subject><subject>methodological nationalism</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>0007-1315</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshiwW4G3_H4D4kFtLSAKioEhaV1x_G0TmfGwU5E-vY4JCoSm-CNfe3vHMnnEEKB1VDWq0UNrdRV27aybhiTNWPMQL15QGb3Dw_JrNyqCjiII_Ik50UZm0bIx-QIpGDSmHZGTq-mJbrbMF1TF_MYl3EIK5xCHmkfE13deJqjCzjQ7IKfnM-vKdLks8fkbihe-2mOT8mjHofsn-33Y3J19v7byYfq4vL848nbi8oJA1D1Zi6Vx67l3AjUynWKGemgkdow0Ym50AIYNx120CAzXd-j6ICj8k5p1_Jj8nLnu0zx59rnlR1Ddn4YcPJxna1UquSg2WGwRAGNgIOgUKAaadRBkOsGVPlXAV_8Ay7iOk0lFgtGSyM54wXSO8ilmHPyvV2mMGK6s8DstmG7sNsi7bZIu23Y_mnYbor0-d5_3Y1-_le4r7QAb3bArzD4u_82tu8-XX4tp6KvdvqQV35zr8d0W_LlStgfn8_tl1adMam-21P-G7powTE</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Beck, Ulrich</creator><creator>Sznaider, Natan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><author>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cosmopolitanism</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>methodological cosmopolitanism</topic><topic>methodological nationalism</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The British journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, Ulrich</au><au>Sznaider, Natan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sociol</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0007-1315</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><eissn>1468-4446</eissn><coden>BJOSAU</coden><abstract>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16506994</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1315 |
ispartof | The British journal of sociology, 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23 |
issn | 0007-1315 1468-4446 1468-4446 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67700980 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Cosmopolitanism Globalization Humanities Humans International relations Internationality methodological cosmopolitanism methodological nationalism Methodology Methodology (Philosophical) Nationalism Paradigms Politics Social Sciences Social Theories Social theory Sociology Studies System theory Theory Transnationalism |
title | Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unpacking%20cosmopolitanism%20for%20the%20social%20sciences:%20a%20research%20agenda&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Beck,%20Ulrich&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0007-1315&rft.eissn=1468-4446&rft.coden=BJOSAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38217339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198696303&rft_id=info:pmid/16506994&rfr_iscdi=true |