Loading…

Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda

This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political phi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British journal of sociology 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23
Main Authors: Beck, Ulrich, Sznaider, Natan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The British journal of sociology
container_volume 57
creator Beck, Ulrich
Sznaider, Natan
description This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67700980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38217339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshiwW4G3_H4D4kFtLSAKioEhaV1x_G0TmfGwU5E-vY4JCoSm-CNfe3vHMnnEEKB1VDWq0UNrdRV27aybhiTNWPMQL15QGb3Dw_JrNyqCjiII_Ik50UZm0bIx-QIpGDSmHZGTq-mJbrbMF1TF_MYl3EIK5xCHmkfE13deJqjCzjQ7IKfnM-vKdLks8fkbihe-2mOT8mjHofsn-33Y3J19v7byYfq4vL848nbi8oJA1D1Zi6Vx67l3AjUynWKGemgkdow0Ym50AIYNx120CAzXd-j6ICj8k5p1_Jj8nLnu0zx59rnlR1Ddn4YcPJxna1UquSg2WGwRAGNgIOgUKAaadRBkOsGVPlXAV_8Ay7iOk0lFgtGSyM54wXSO8ilmHPyvV2mMGK6s8DstmG7sNsi7bZIu23Y_mnYbor0-d5_3Y1-_le4r7QAb3bArzD4u_82tu8-XX4tp6KvdvqQV35zr8d0W_LlStgfn8_tl1adMam-21P-G7powTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198696303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><description>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1315</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1468-4446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16506994</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOSAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cosmopolitanism ; Globalization ; Humanities ; Humans ; International relations ; Internationality ; methodological cosmopolitanism ; methodological nationalism ; Methodology ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Nationalism ; Paradigms ; Politics ; Social Sciences ; Social Theories ; Social theory ; Sociology ; Studies ; System theory ; Theory ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>The British journal of sociology, 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>London School of Economics and Political Science 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33202,33203,33753,33754</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16506994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><title>The British journal of sociology</title><addtitle>Br J Sociol</addtitle><description>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</description><subject>Cosmopolitanism</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>methodological cosmopolitanism</subject><subject>methodological nationalism</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>0007-1315</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshiwW4G3_H4D4kFtLSAKioEhaV1x_G0TmfGwU5E-vY4JCoSm-CNfe3vHMnnEEKB1VDWq0UNrdRV27aybhiTNWPMQL15QGb3Dw_JrNyqCjiII_Ik50UZm0bIx-QIpGDSmHZGTq-mJbrbMF1TF_MYl3EIK5xCHmkfE13deJqjCzjQ7IKfnM-vKdLks8fkbihe-2mOT8mjHofsn-33Y3J19v7byYfq4vL848nbi8oJA1D1Zi6Vx67l3AjUynWKGemgkdow0Ym50AIYNx120CAzXd-j6ICj8k5p1_Jj8nLnu0zx59rnlR1Ddn4YcPJxna1UquSg2WGwRAGNgIOgUKAaadRBkOsGVPlXAV_8Ay7iOk0lFgtGSyM54wXSO8ilmHPyvV2mMGK6s8DstmG7sNsi7bZIu23Y_mnYbor0-d5_3Y1-_le4r7QAb3bArzD4u_82tu8-XX4tp6KvdvqQV35zr8d0W_LlStgfn8_tl1adMam-21P-G7powTE</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Beck, Ulrich</creator><creator>Sznaider, Natan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</title><author>Beck, Ulrich ; Sznaider, Natan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cosmopolitanism</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>methodological cosmopolitanism</topic><topic>methodological nationalism</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sznaider, Natan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The British journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, Ulrich</au><au>Sznaider, Natan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sociol</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0007-1315</issn><issn>1468-4446</issn><eissn>1468-4446</eissn><coden>BJOSAU</coden><abstract>This article calls for a re‐conceptualization of the social sciences by asking for a cosmopolitan turn. The intellectual undertaking of redefining cosmopolitanism is a trans‐disciplinary one, which includes geography, anthropology, ethnology, international relations, international law, political philosophy and political theory, and now sociology and social theory. Methodological nationalism, which subsumes society under the nation‐state, has until now made this task almost impossible. The alternative, a ‘cosmopolitan outlook’, is a contested term and project. Cosmopolitanism must not be equalized with the global (or globalization), with ‘world system theory’ (Wallerstein), with ‘world polity’ (Meyer and others), or with ‘world‐society’ (Luhmann). All of those concepts presuppose basic dualisms, such as domestic/foreign or national/international, which in reality have become ambiguous. Methodological cosmopolitanism opens up new horizons by demonstrating how we can make the empirical investigation of border crossings and other transnational phenomena possible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16506994</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1315
ispartof The British journal of sociology, 2006-03, Vol.57 (1), p.1-23
issn 0007-1315
1468-4446
1468-4446
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67700980
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Cosmopolitanism
Globalization
Humanities
Humans
International relations
Internationality
methodological cosmopolitanism
methodological nationalism
Methodology
Methodology (Philosophical)
Nationalism
Paradigms
Politics
Social Sciences
Social Theories
Social theory
Sociology
Studies
System theory
Theory
Transnationalism
title Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unpacking%20cosmopolitanism%20for%20the%20social%20sciences:%20a%20research%20agenda&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Beck,%20Ulrich&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0007-1315&rft.eissn=1468-4446&rft.coden=BJOSAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38217339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-f9d67eab43395a87cb7096c1268905b5d5851039bab12a09bffa5b13a7ec78c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198696303&rft_id=info:pmid/16506994&rfr_iscdi=true