Loading…

The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses

Myiasis, the infestation of live vertebrates with dipterous larvae, seems to take two distinct forms that, it has been suggested, evolved from two distinct phylogenetic roots: saprophagous and sanguinivorous. However, the convergent evolution of morphological and life-history traits seems to have ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in parasitology 2006-03, Vol.22 (3), p.129-136
Main Authors: Stevens, Jamie R., Wallman, James F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7be5359b1d1c3abda9f186dee7aa2cd9082b4bf1127ff7709ab74f98d5fcc7ad3
cites
container_end_page 136
container_issue 3
container_start_page 129
container_title Trends in parasitology
container_volume 22
creator Stevens, Jamie R.
Wallman, James F.
description Myiasis, the infestation of live vertebrates with dipterous larvae, seems to take two distinct forms that, it has been suggested, evolved from two distinct phylogenetic roots: saprophagous and sanguinivorous. However, the convergent evolution of morphological and life-history traits seems to have had a major role in simplifying this overall assessment of the evolutionary routes by which myiasis arose. Moreover, this somewhat simplistic division is further complicated by the existence of both ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species of myiasis-causing Diptera, the evolutionary affinities of which remain to be resolved. To understand how different forms of parasitism arose, the evolution of the various groups of myiasis-causing flies must be separated from the evolution of the myiasis habit per se. Until recently, evolutionary studies of myiasis-causing flies were little more than discussions of morphology-based taxonomy. Since the mid-1990s, however, several formal phylogenies – based on both morphological and, increasingly, molecular data – have been published, enabling reassessment of the hypotheses concerning myiasis evolution. In part I of this review, we focus on some recent landmark studies in this often-neglected branch of parasitology and draw together phylogenetic studies based on molecular and morphological data to provide a framework for the subsequent analysis of biochemical, immunological, behavioural, biogeographical and fossil evidence relating to the evolution of myiasis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pt.2006.01.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67704236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471492206000249</els_id><sourcerecordid>17110417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7be5359b1d1c3abda9f186dee7aa2cd9082b4bf1127ff7709ab74f98d5fcc7ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoh9w54R8AZXDpjOJEye9oapApaq9FHG0HHvMepXEwU5a7X-P243UE-Lkseb3nkbvZdkHhBwB6_NdPs15AVDngDlA8yo7Ri5wUwGI1-vM26I4yk5i3AFgJUT7NjvCmlct8uY4G--3xOjB98vs_Mi8ZcPeqegicyPbLoMaI1OjYX7eUkiTG1T_vEt_dteb5-UtPbJfPvQmsrNJhZldf7lg03bf-9800ux0olS_jxTfZW9sMqD363ua_fx2dX_5Y3Nz9_368uvNRnNo543oqCqrtkODulSdUa3FpjZEQqlCmxaaouOdRSyEtUJAqzrBbduYymotlClPs88H3yn4PwvFWQ4uaup7NZJfoqyTiBdl_V8QBSJwFAmEA6iDjzGQlVNIYYS9RJBPZcidnGb5VIYElKmMJPm4ei_dQOZFsKafgE8roKJWvQ1q1C6-cKKGUhRV4i4OHKXIHhwFGbWjUZNxgfQsjXf_vuIvKvmnIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17110417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Stevens, Jamie R. ; Wallman, James F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jamie R. ; Wallman, James F.</creatorcontrib><description>Myiasis, the infestation of live vertebrates with dipterous larvae, seems to take two distinct forms that, it has been suggested, evolved from two distinct phylogenetic roots: saprophagous and sanguinivorous. However, the convergent evolution of morphological and life-history traits seems to have had a major role in simplifying this overall assessment of the evolutionary routes by which myiasis arose. Moreover, this somewhat simplistic division is further complicated by the existence of both ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species of myiasis-causing Diptera, the evolutionary affinities of which remain to be resolved. To understand how different forms of parasitism arose, the evolution of the various groups of myiasis-causing flies must be separated from the evolution of the myiasis habit per se. Until recently, evolutionary studies of myiasis-causing flies were little more than discussions of morphology-based taxonomy. Since the mid-1990s, however, several formal phylogenies – based on both morphological and, increasingly, molecular data – have been published, enabling reassessment of the hypotheses concerning myiasis evolution. In part I of this review, we focus on some recent landmark studies in this often-neglected branch of parasitology and draw together phylogenetic studies based on molecular and morphological data to provide a framework for the subsequent analysis of biochemical, immunological, behavioural, biogeographical and fossil evidence relating to the evolution of myiasis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-4922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.01.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16459148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Evolution ; Diptera ; Diptera - classification ; Diptera - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Myiasis - parasitology ; Phylogeny ; Protozoa ; Systematics. Geographical distribution. Morphology. Cytology</subject><ispartof>Trends in parasitology, 2006-03, Vol.22 (3), p.129-136</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7be5359b1d1c3abda9f186dee7aa2cd9082b4bf1127ff7709ab74f98d5fcc7ad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17603725$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16459148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jamie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallman, James F.</creatorcontrib><title>The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses</title><title>Trends in parasitology</title><addtitle>Trends Parasitol</addtitle><description>Myiasis, the infestation of live vertebrates with dipterous larvae, seems to take two distinct forms that, it has been suggested, evolved from two distinct phylogenetic roots: saprophagous and sanguinivorous. However, the convergent evolution of morphological and life-history traits seems to have had a major role in simplifying this overall assessment of the evolutionary routes by which myiasis arose. Moreover, this somewhat simplistic division is further complicated by the existence of both ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species of myiasis-causing Diptera, the evolutionary affinities of which remain to be resolved. To understand how different forms of parasitism arose, the evolution of the various groups of myiasis-causing flies must be separated from the evolution of the myiasis habit per se. Until recently, evolutionary studies of myiasis-causing flies were little more than discussions of morphology-based taxonomy. Since the mid-1990s, however, several formal phylogenies – based on both morphological and, increasingly, molecular data – have been published, enabling reassessment of the hypotheses concerning myiasis evolution. In part I of this review, we focus on some recent landmark studies in this often-neglected branch of parasitology and draw together phylogenetic studies based on molecular and morphological data to provide a framework for the subsequent analysis of biochemical, immunological, behavioural, biogeographical and fossil evidence relating to the evolution of myiasis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Diptera - classification</subject><subject>Diptera - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Myiasis - parasitology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Systematics. Geographical distribution. Morphology. Cytology</subject><issn>1471-4922</issn><issn>1471-5007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoh9w54R8AZXDpjOJEye9oapApaq9FHG0HHvMepXEwU5a7X-P243UE-Lkseb3nkbvZdkHhBwB6_NdPs15AVDngDlA8yo7Ri5wUwGI1-vM26I4yk5i3AFgJUT7NjvCmlct8uY4G--3xOjB98vs_Mi8ZcPeqegicyPbLoMaI1OjYX7eUkiTG1T_vEt_dteb5-UtPbJfPvQmsrNJhZldf7lg03bf-9800ux0olS_jxTfZW9sMqD363ua_fx2dX_5Y3Nz9_368uvNRnNo543oqCqrtkODulSdUa3FpjZEQqlCmxaaouOdRSyEtUJAqzrBbduYymotlClPs88H3yn4PwvFWQ4uaup7NZJfoqyTiBdl_V8QBSJwFAmEA6iDjzGQlVNIYYS9RJBPZcidnGb5VIYElKmMJPm4ei_dQOZFsKafgE8roKJWvQ1q1C6-cKKGUhRV4i4OHKXIHhwFGbWjUZNxgfQsjXf_vuIvKvmnIw</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Stevens, Jamie R.</creator><creator>Wallman, James F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses</title><author>Stevens, Jamie R. ; Wallman, James F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7be5359b1d1c3abda9f186dee7aa2cd9082b4bf1127ff7709ab74f98d5fcc7ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Diptera - classification</topic><topic>Diptera - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Myiasis - parasitology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Systematics. Geographical distribution. Morphology. Cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jamie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallman, James F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Jamie R.</au><au>Wallman, James F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses</atitle><jtitle>Trends in parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Parasitol</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>129-136</pages><issn>1471-4922</issn><eissn>1471-5007</eissn><abstract>Myiasis, the infestation of live vertebrates with dipterous larvae, seems to take two distinct forms that, it has been suggested, evolved from two distinct phylogenetic roots: saprophagous and sanguinivorous. However, the convergent evolution of morphological and life-history traits seems to have had a major role in simplifying this overall assessment of the evolutionary routes by which myiasis arose. Moreover, this somewhat simplistic division is further complicated by the existence of both ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species of myiasis-causing Diptera, the evolutionary affinities of which remain to be resolved. To understand how different forms of parasitism arose, the evolution of the various groups of myiasis-causing flies must be separated from the evolution of the myiasis habit per se. Until recently, evolutionary studies of myiasis-causing flies were little more than discussions of morphology-based taxonomy. Since the mid-1990s, however, several formal phylogenies – based on both morphological and, increasingly, molecular data – have been published, enabling reassessment of the hypotheses concerning myiasis evolution. In part I of this review, we focus on some recent landmark studies in this often-neglected branch of parasitology and draw together phylogenetic studies based on molecular and morphological data to provide a framework for the subsequent analysis of biochemical, immunological, behavioural, biogeographical and fossil evidence relating to the evolution of myiasis.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16459148</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pt.2006.01.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-4922
ispartof Trends in parasitology, 2006-03, Vol.22 (3), p.129-136
issn 1471-4922
1471-5007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67704236
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biological Evolution
Diptera
Diptera - classification
Diptera - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Host-Parasite Interactions
Myiasis - parasitology
Phylogeny
Protozoa
Systematics. Geographical distribution. Morphology. Cytology
title The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T23%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20evolution%20of%20myiasis%20in%20humans%20and%20other%20animals%20in%20the%20Old%20and%20New%20Worlds%20(part%20I):%20phylogenetic%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20parasitology&rft.au=Stevens,%20Jamie%20R.&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=129-136&rft.issn=1471-4922&rft.eissn=1471-5007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pt.2006.01.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17110417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7be5359b1d1c3abda9f186dee7aa2cd9082b4bf1127ff7709ab74f98d5fcc7ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17110417&rft_id=info:pmid/16459148&rfr_iscdi=true