Loading…

Synthesis, Characterization, and Photophysical Properties of a Free Base and a Biszinc(II) Complex of 1,3-Bisporphyrincalix[4]arene:  Evidence for “Tunable Intramolecular Open and Closed Conformations”

The bismacrocycle 5,17-bis[5-(2,8,13,17-tetraethyl-3,7,12,18-tetramethylporphyrinyl)]-25,26,27,28-tetrapropoxycalix[4]arene (4) was synthesized in three steps from the corresponding bisaldehyde 5,17-diformyl-25,26,27,28-tetrapropoxycalix[4]arene. The biszinc(II) complex (5) was prepared as well, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Inorganic chemistry 2005-04, Vol.44 (8), p.2836-2842
Main Authors: Tremblay-Morin, Jean-Philipe, Faure, Sébastien, Samar, Dalila, Stern, Christine, Guilard, Roger, Harvey, Pierre D
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The bismacrocycle 5,17-bis[5-(2,8,13,17-tetraethyl-3,7,12,18-tetramethylporphyrinyl)]-25,26,27,28-tetrapropoxycalix[4]arene (4) was synthesized in three steps from the corresponding bisaldehyde 5,17-diformyl-25,26,27,28-tetrapropoxycalix[4]arene. The biszinc(II) complex (5) was prepared as well, and the photophysical properties were measured using 2-MeTHF as solvent at 298 and 77 K. While computer modeling for 5 predicts that both pinched cone conformers, closed (porphyrins near each other) and open (porphyrins away from each other), may exist in the “gas phase”, the experimental data indicate clearly that no zinc porphyrin···zinc porphyrin interactions are present in solution at 298 K, favoring the open conformer, where the two macrocycles are placed away from each other. On the other hand, clear evidence for a closed conformer is observed at 77 K. Variable-temperature 1H NMR experiments show that 5 is fluxional between 298 and 183 K, while 4 keeps the open conformation for the whole temperature range. This behavior is unprecedented for calix[4]areneporphyrin compounds, and the relative porphyrin ring rigidity is postulated to explain this difference.
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic048261n