Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses

The aim of the present study was the evaluation of differences in clinical results, proprioceptive performance and gait in patients with unicondylar and bicondylar sledge prostheses of the knee. In a retrospective study, 17 patients with unicondylar sledge prostheses were compared with 15 patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-04, Vol.13 (3), p.197-202
Main Authors: Fuchs, S, Tibesku, C O, Frisse, D, Genkinger, M, Laass, H, Rosenbaum, D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Female
Gait
Humans
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Proprioception
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Sports injuries
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33
container_end_page 202
container_issue 3
container_start_page 197
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 13
creator Fuchs, S
Tibesku, C O
Frisse, D
Genkinger, M
Laass, H
Rosenbaum, D
description The aim of the present study was the evaluation of differences in clinical results, proprioceptive performance and gait in patients with unicondylar and bicondylar sledge prostheses of the knee. In a retrospective study, 17 patients with unicondylar sledge prostheses were compared with 15 patients with bicondylar sledge prostheses. Clinical examination was rated using HSS, Knee Society, and patellar scores and a visual analogue scale for pain. Proprioceptive performance was examined using sway measurements during single leg stance on a force platform. In addition, the patients underwent 3-D gait analysis including measurements of ground reaction forces and surface electromyographic (EMG) investigation of the lower extremity. Comparing both patient groups in clinical scores, gait, EMG and proprioception, no significant differences were found. Implantation of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining both cruciate ligaments achieves functional results as good as unicompartmental arthroplasty. The presented results might encourage future research on new models of total joint replacement with preservation of both cruciate ligaments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-004-0580-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67735478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193759651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQxMBmOMeO7Yyo4ktUYoHZchwbXCV2iZOh_x6XVkJiujvpuTu9D0KXBG4JgLhLAIQLDMAwVBLw9gjNCaMUC8rEMZpDzUpcQsVn6CylNUBuWX2KZqTipCaUzNHrsvPBG90VOrSFm4IZfQx5NLHf6MGnGIroiil4_Es03sTQbjs9FKmz7actNkNM45dNNp2jE6e7ZC8OdYE-Hh_el8949fb0srxfYUNLPmJTa1ZSblvdlJLThgGrdaupFFwQR13JHJHS1lTXwKXlvHFOssaxtnSZpHSBbvZ38-vvyaZR9T4Z23U62DglxYWgFRMyg9f_wHWchpwuKQmi4hWRkCGyh0wOkgbr1GbwvR62ioDaaVZ7zSprVjvNapt3rg6Hp6a37d_GwSv9AR2veCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807565180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Fuchs, S ; Tibesku, C O ; Frisse, D ; Genkinger, M ; Laass, H ; Rosenbaum, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, S ; Tibesku, C O ; Frisse, D ; Genkinger, M ; Laass, H ; Rosenbaum, D</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was the evaluation of differences in clinical results, proprioceptive performance and gait in patients with unicondylar and bicondylar sledge prostheses of the knee. In a retrospective study, 17 patients with unicondylar sledge prostheses were compared with 15 patients with bicondylar sledge prostheses. Clinical examination was rated using HSS, Knee Society, and patellar scores and a visual analogue scale for pain. Proprioceptive performance was examined using sway measurements during single leg stance on a force platform. In addition, the patients underwent 3-D gait analysis including measurements of ground reaction forces and surface electromyographic (EMG) investigation of the lower extremity. Comparing both patient groups in clinical scores, gait, EMG and proprioception, no significant differences were found. Implantation of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining both cruciate ligaments achieves functional results as good as unicompartmental arthroplasty. The presented results might encourage future research on new models of total joint replacement with preservation of both cruciate ligaments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0580-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15619131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Female ; Gait ; Humans ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Proprioception ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Sports injuries ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-04, Vol.13 (3), p.197-202</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15619131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesku, C O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisse, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genkinger, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laass, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, D</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was the evaluation of differences in clinical results, proprioceptive performance and gait in patients with unicondylar and bicondylar sledge prostheses of the knee. In a retrospective study, 17 patients with unicondylar sledge prostheses were compared with 15 patients with bicondylar sledge prostheses. Clinical examination was rated using HSS, Knee Society, and patellar scores and a visual analogue scale for pain. Proprioceptive performance was examined using sway measurements during single leg stance on a force platform. In addition, the patients underwent 3-D gait analysis including measurements of ground reaction forces and surface electromyographic (EMG) investigation of the lower extremity. Comparing both patient groups in clinical scores, gait, EMG and proprioception, no significant differences were found. Implantation of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining both cruciate ligaments achieves functional results as good as unicompartmental arthroplasty. The presented results might encourage future research on new models of total joint replacement with preservation of both cruciate ligaments.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQxMBmOMeO7Yyo4ktUYoHZchwbXCV2iZOh_x6XVkJiujvpuTu9D0KXBG4JgLhLAIQLDMAwVBLw9gjNCaMUC8rEMZpDzUpcQsVn6CylNUBuWX2KZqTipCaUzNHrsvPBG90VOrSFm4IZfQx5NLHf6MGnGIroiil4_Es03sTQbjs9FKmz7actNkNM45dNNp2jE6e7ZC8OdYE-Hh_el8949fb0srxfYUNLPmJTa1ZSblvdlJLThgGrdaupFFwQR13JHJHS1lTXwKXlvHFOssaxtnSZpHSBbvZ38-vvyaZR9T4Z23U62DglxYWgFRMyg9f_wHWchpwuKQmi4hWRkCGyh0wOkgbr1GbwvR62ioDaaVZ7zSprVjvNapt3rg6Hp6a37d_GwSv9AR2veCM</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Fuchs, S</creator><creator>Tibesku, C O</creator><creator>Frisse, D</creator><creator>Genkinger, M</creator><creator>Laass, H</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, D</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses</title><author>Fuchs, S ; Tibesku, C O ; Frisse, D ; Genkinger, M ; Laass, H ; Rosenbaum, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesku, C O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisse, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genkinger, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laass, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuchs, S</au><au>Tibesku, C O</au><au>Frisse, D</au><au>Genkinger, M</au><au>Laass, H</au><au>Rosenbaum, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>197-202</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was the evaluation of differences in clinical results, proprioceptive performance and gait in patients with unicondylar and bicondylar sledge prostheses of the knee. In a retrospective study, 17 patients with unicondylar sledge prostheses were compared with 15 patients with bicondylar sledge prostheses. Clinical examination was rated using HSS, Knee Society, and patellar scores and a visual analogue scale for pain. Proprioceptive performance was examined using sway measurements during single leg stance on a force platform. In addition, the patients underwent 3-D gait analysis including measurements of ground reaction forces and surface electromyographic (EMG) investigation of the lower extremity. Comparing both patient groups in clinical scores, gait, EMG and proprioception, no significant differences were found. Implantation of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining both cruciate ligaments achieves functional results as good as unicompartmental arthroplasty. The presented results might encourage future research on new models of total joint replacement with preservation of both cruciate ligaments.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15619131</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-004-0580-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-04, Vol.13 (3), p.197-202
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67735478
source Springer Nature; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Female
Gait
Humans
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Proprioception
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Sports injuries
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A28%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20functional%20comparison%20of%20uni-%20and%20bicondylar%20sledge%20prostheses&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Fuchs,%20S&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=197-202&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-004-0580-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193759651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9a4236edab2863b4049ada387671f3f24f188e93a9068e66bff84bf4d2f49a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807565180&rft_id=info:pmid/15619131&rfr_iscdi=true