Loading…

Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space

We have computationally compared cancer medicinal chemistry space to orally bioavailable drug space. Applying traditional cheminformatic filtering techniques to potential oncology targeted drugs acutely limits the amount of chemical space explored. Approaches for the experimental determination of pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug discovery today 2006-02, Vol.11 (3-4), p.149-159
Main Authors: Lloyd, David G., Golfis, Georgia, Knox, Andrew J.S., Fayne, Darren, Meegan, Mary J., Oprea, Tudor I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3
container_end_page 159
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 149
container_title Drug discovery today
container_volume 11
creator Lloyd, David G.
Golfis, Georgia
Knox, Andrew J.S.
Fayne, Darren
Meegan, Mary J.
Oprea, Tudor I.
description We have computationally compared cancer medicinal chemistry space to orally bioavailable drug space. Applying traditional cheminformatic filtering techniques to potential oncology targeted drugs acutely limits the amount of chemical space explored. Approaches for the experimental determination of protein–ligand molecular interactions are reliant on the quality of the compounds being tested. The application of large, randomly designed combinatorial libraries has given way to the creation of more-focused ‘drug-like’ libraries. Prior to synthesis, we wish to screen the potential compounds to remove undesired chemical moieties and to be within a required range of physiochemical properties. We have used a principal-component analysis (PCA) computational approach to analyze the 3D descriptor space of active and non-active (hit-like) cancer medicinal chemistry compounds. We define hit-like those molecules passing the unmodified OpenEye FILTER program. Our analysis indicates that these compounds occupy quite different regions in space. Cancer-active compounds exist in a much greater volume of space than generic hit-like space and most of them fail the commonly applied filters for orally bioavailable drugs. This is of great significance when designing orally bioavailable cancer target drugs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03688-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67743188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359644605036883</els_id><sourcerecordid>17109038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BFA2IFgEPPEzbCqEeElILIC15biTYpQmxU4R_XvcB2LJambkM-OrQ8gR0AugIC9fgIkyl5zLMyrOKZNa52yLDEArnQvNiu3U_yJ7ZD_GD0qhKIXcJXsgBWMK2ICMnlvXNd1kkeH3rOmC7X3XXmXu3Ybet5PM2dZhyKY49s63tkkvOPWxD4sszqzDA7JT2ybi4aYOydvd7evNQ_70fP94c_2UO17wPle1orVgCoHKwjqwQmCaBLWFtlUx5tKh5RWnCpxFVkEhZVnVohSQ4kvHhuR0fXcWus85xt6kFA6bxrbYzaORSnEGWv8LggJaUrYExRp0oYsxYG1mwU9tWBigZqnYrBSbpT9DhVkpNiztHW8-mFdJy9_WxmkCTjaAjc42dUgKffzjFFdaFDRxozWHyduXx2Ci85h0j31A15tx5_-J8gPP25eQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17109038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Lloyd, David G. ; Golfis, Georgia ; Knox, Andrew J.S. ; Fayne, Darren ; Meegan, Mary J. ; Oprea, Tudor I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, David G. ; Golfis, Georgia ; Knox, Andrew J.S. ; Fayne, Darren ; Meegan, Mary J. ; Oprea, Tudor I.</creatorcontrib><description>We have computationally compared cancer medicinal chemistry space to orally bioavailable drug space. Applying traditional cheminformatic filtering techniques to potential oncology targeted drugs acutely limits the amount of chemical space explored. Approaches for the experimental determination of protein–ligand molecular interactions are reliant on the quality of the compounds being tested. The application of large, randomly designed combinatorial libraries has given way to the creation of more-focused ‘drug-like’ libraries. Prior to synthesis, we wish to screen the potential compounds to remove undesired chemical moieties and to be within a required range of physiochemical properties. We have used a principal-component analysis (PCA) computational approach to analyze the 3D descriptor space of active and non-active (hit-like) cancer medicinal chemistry compounds. We define hit-like those molecules passing the unmodified OpenEye FILTER program. Our analysis indicates that these compounds occupy quite different regions in space. Cancer-active compounds exist in a much greater volume of space than generic hit-like space and most of them fail the commonly applied filters for orally bioavailable drugs. This is of great significance when designing orally bioavailable cancer target drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03688-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16533713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents ; bioavailability ; Biological and medical sciences ; cancer ; chemistry space ; Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques ; Drug Design ; General pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; medicinal chemistry ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Principal Component Analysis ; protein-ligand interactions</subject><ispartof>Drug discovery today, 2006-02, Vol.11 (3-4), p.149-159</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17478520$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16533713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfis, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, Andrew J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayne, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meegan, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Tudor I.</creatorcontrib><title>Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space</title><title>Drug discovery today</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><description>We have computationally compared cancer medicinal chemistry space to orally bioavailable drug space. Applying traditional cheminformatic filtering techniques to potential oncology targeted drugs acutely limits the amount of chemical space explored. Approaches for the experimental determination of protein–ligand molecular interactions are reliant on the quality of the compounds being tested. The application of large, randomly designed combinatorial libraries has given way to the creation of more-focused ‘drug-like’ libraries. Prior to synthesis, we wish to screen the potential compounds to remove undesired chemical moieties and to be within a required range of physiochemical properties. We have used a principal-component analysis (PCA) computational approach to analyze the 3D descriptor space of active and non-active (hit-like) cancer medicinal chemistry compounds. We define hit-like those molecules passing the unmodified OpenEye FILTER program. Our analysis indicates that these compounds occupy quite different regions in space. Cancer-active compounds exist in a much greater volume of space than generic hit-like space and most of them fail the commonly applied filters for orally bioavailable drugs. This is of great significance when designing orally bioavailable cancer target drugs.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents</subject><subject>bioavailability</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>chemistry space</subject><subject>Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques</subject><subject>Drug Design</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>medicinal chemistry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>protein-ligand interactions</subject><issn>1359-6446</issn><issn>1878-5832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BFA2IFgEPPEzbCqEeElILIC15biTYpQmxU4R_XvcB2LJambkM-OrQ8gR0AugIC9fgIkyl5zLMyrOKZNa52yLDEArnQvNiu3U_yJ7ZD_GD0qhKIXcJXsgBWMK2ICMnlvXNd1kkeH3rOmC7X3XXmXu3Ybet5PM2dZhyKY49s63tkkvOPWxD4sszqzDA7JT2ybi4aYOydvd7evNQ_70fP94c_2UO17wPle1orVgCoHKwjqwQmCaBLWFtlUx5tKh5RWnCpxFVkEhZVnVohSQ4kvHhuR0fXcWus85xt6kFA6bxrbYzaORSnEGWv8LggJaUrYExRp0oYsxYG1mwU9tWBigZqnYrBSbpT9DhVkpNiztHW8-mFdJy9_WxmkCTjaAjc42dUgKffzjFFdaFDRxozWHyduXx2Ci85h0j31A15tx5_-J8gPP25eQ</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Lloyd, David G.</creator><creator>Golfis, Georgia</creator><creator>Knox, Andrew J.S.</creator><creator>Fayne, Darren</creator><creator>Meegan, Mary J.</creator><creator>Oprea, Tudor I.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space</title><author>Lloyd, David G. ; Golfis, Georgia ; Knox, Andrew J.S. ; Fayne, Darren ; Meegan, Mary J. ; Oprea, Tudor I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents</topic><topic>bioavailability</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>chemistry space</topic><topic>Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques</topic><topic>Drug Design</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>medicinal chemistry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>protein-ligand interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfis, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, Andrew J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayne, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meegan, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Tudor I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lloyd, David G.</au><au>Golfis, Georgia</au><au>Knox, Andrew J.S.</au><au>Fayne, Darren</au><au>Meegan, Mary J.</au><au>Oprea, Tudor I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>149-159</pages><issn>1359-6446</issn><eissn>1878-5832</eissn><abstract>We have computationally compared cancer medicinal chemistry space to orally bioavailable drug space. Applying traditional cheminformatic filtering techniques to potential oncology targeted drugs acutely limits the amount of chemical space explored. Approaches for the experimental determination of protein–ligand molecular interactions are reliant on the quality of the compounds being tested. The application of large, randomly designed combinatorial libraries has given way to the creation of more-focused ‘drug-like’ libraries. Prior to synthesis, we wish to screen the potential compounds to remove undesired chemical moieties and to be within a required range of physiochemical properties. We have used a principal-component analysis (PCA) computational approach to analyze the 3D descriptor space of active and non-active (hit-like) cancer medicinal chemistry compounds. We define hit-like those molecules passing the unmodified OpenEye FILTER program. Our analysis indicates that these compounds occupy quite different regions in space. Cancer-active compounds exist in a much greater volume of space than generic hit-like space and most of them fail the commonly applied filters for orally bioavailable drugs. This is of great significance when designing orally bioavailable cancer target drugs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16533713</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03688-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-6446
ispartof Drug discovery today, 2006-02, Vol.11 (3-4), p.149-159
issn 1359-6446
1878-5832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67743188
source Elsevier
subjects Antineoplastic Agents
bioavailability
Biological and medical sciences
cancer
chemistry space
Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques
Drug Design
General pharmacology
Medical sciences
medicinal chemistry
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Principal Component Analysis
protein-ligand interactions
title Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oncology%20exploration:%20charting%20cancer%20medicinal%20chemistry%20space&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today&rft.au=Lloyd,%20David%20G.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=149-159&rft.issn=1359-6446&rft.eissn=1878-5832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03688-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17109038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7f70f537e1062ac1a55e37e50a28ab2d46cea4b4071cae3b12669bf59514466c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17109038&rft_id=info:pmid/16533713&rfr_iscdi=true