Loading…

In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty

Restenosis is a major health care problem, with approximately 40% of angioplasties resulting in restenosis. Mechanisms related to elastic recoil, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis are implicated. In vivo studies have demonstrated the potential for cryotherapy to combat the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cryobiology 2005-04, Vol.50 (2), p.162-173
Main Authors: Grassl, Erin D., Bischof, John C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 162
container_title Cryobiology
container_volume 50
creator Grassl, Erin D.
Bischof, John C.
description Restenosis is a major health care problem, with approximately 40% of angioplasties resulting in restenosis. Mechanisms related to elastic recoil, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis are implicated. In vivo studies have demonstrated the potential for cryotherapy to combat the process of restenosis, but the mechanisms whereby freezing and/or cooling can reduce or eliminate smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and ECM synthesis are not well known. While in vivo testing is ultimately necessary, in vitro models can provide important information on thermal parameters and mechanisms of injury. However, it is important to carefully choose the model system for in vitro work on cryoinjury characterization to adequately reflect the clinical situation. In this study, we examined the differences in response to cryoinjury by SMCs from different species (rat, pig, and human) and in different cellular environments (suspension vs. tissue equivalent). Tissue equivalents, composed of cells embedded in collagen or fibrin gel, provide a 3-D tissue-like environment, while allowing for controlled composition. As reported here, all SMCs showed similar trends, but rat cells appeared less sensitive to cooling at faster cooling rates in suspension, while human SMCs were less sensitive to temperatures just above freezing when embedded in collagen. In addition, the SMCs were less sensitive in suspension than they were in collagen. Cells in suspension exhibited 70% viability at −11 °C, whereas cells in the tissue equivalent model showed only 30% survival. Future studies will aim to more adequately represent the conditions in restenosis by providing inflammatory and proliferative cues to the cells.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67759807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011224005000234</els_id><sourcerecordid>67759807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVoSLZp_0LQqTe7I9myrFtL6CMQKJTmLGRpRLXY1laSF_bf12a39LinYeCb50fII4OaAes-7mubTnEIcaw5gKiB1QD8huwYKKh4o_gbsgNgrOK8hXvyNuc9AHSyae_IPRN926zZjvx8nukxlBTpFB2ONJ9ywSlTHxPFoxkXU0KcafQ0TzGW33Rash2RWhxHmjAf4pyRlki3dQ6jyeX0jtx6M2Z8f4kP5PXrl19P36uXH9-enz6_VLblfakMk8q1XDiPwgDDruWq8Uo4KbjtB-kRjPMKxDBYLwczCN7LoZfOrdd1rWgeyIdz30OKfxbMRU8hb3uZGeOSdSelUD3IqyCHnolO9VdBJgWoTmxgdwZtijkn9PqQwmTSSTPQmx-91__86M2PBqZXP2vh42XCMkzo_pddhKzApzOA6-eOAZPONuBs0YWEtmgXw7UZfwGYaaXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17509658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Grassl, Erin D. ; Bischof, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grassl, Erin D. ; Bischof, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Restenosis is a major health care problem, with approximately 40% of angioplasties resulting in restenosis. Mechanisms related to elastic recoil, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis are implicated. In vivo studies have demonstrated the potential for cryotherapy to combat the process of restenosis, but the mechanisms whereby freezing and/or cooling can reduce or eliminate smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and ECM synthesis are not well known. While in vivo testing is ultimately necessary, in vitro models can provide important information on thermal parameters and mechanisms of injury. However, it is important to carefully choose the model system for in vitro work on cryoinjury characterization to adequately reflect the clinical situation. In this study, we examined the differences in response to cryoinjury by SMCs from different species (rat, pig, and human) and in different cellular environments (suspension vs. tissue equivalent). Tissue equivalents, composed of cells embedded in collagen or fibrin gel, provide a 3-D tissue-like environment, while allowing for controlled composition. As reported here, all SMCs showed similar trends, but rat cells appeared less sensitive to cooling at faster cooling rates in suspension, while human SMCs were less sensitive to temperatures just above freezing when embedded in collagen. In addition, the SMCs were less sensitive in suspension than they were in collagen. Cells in suspension exhibited 70% viability at −11 °C, whereas cells in the tissue equivalent model showed only 30% survival. Future studies will aim to more adequately represent the conditions in restenosis by providing inflammatory and proliferative cues to the cells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-2240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15843006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty - methods ; Animals ; Cell Survival ; Cryoplasty ; Cryosurgery ; Cryotherapy ; Fibrin - pharmacology ; Freezing injury ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Models, Biological ; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology ; Rats ; Restenosis ; Smooth muscle cells ; Species Specificity ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Cryobiology, 2005-04, Vol.50 (2), p.162-173</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15843006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grassl, Erin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischof, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty</title><title>Cryobiology</title><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><description>Restenosis is a major health care problem, with approximately 40% of angioplasties resulting in restenosis. Mechanisms related to elastic recoil, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis are implicated. In vivo studies have demonstrated the potential for cryotherapy to combat the process of restenosis, but the mechanisms whereby freezing and/or cooling can reduce or eliminate smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and ECM synthesis are not well known. While in vivo testing is ultimately necessary, in vitro models can provide important information on thermal parameters and mechanisms of injury. However, it is important to carefully choose the model system for in vitro work on cryoinjury characterization to adequately reflect the clinical situation. In this study, we examined the differences in response to cryoinjury by SMCs from different species (rat, pig, and human) and in different cellular environments (suspension vs. tissue equivalent). Tissue equivalents, composed of cells embedded in collagen or fibrin gel, provide a 3-D tissue-like environment, while allowing for controlled composition. As reported here, all SMCs showed similar trends, but rat cells appeared less sensitive to cooling at faster cooling rates in suspension, while human SMCs were less sensitive to temperatures just above freezing when embedded in collagen. In addition, the SMCs were less sensitive in suspension than they were in collagen. Cells in suspension exhibited 70% viability at −11 °C, whereas cells in the tissue equivalent model showed only 30% survival. Future studies will aim to more adequately represent the conditions in restenosis by providing inflammatory and proliferative cues to the cells.</description><subject>Angioplasty - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cryoplasty</subject><subject>Cryosurgery</subject><subject>Cryotherapy</subject><subject>Fibrin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Freezing injury</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Restenosis</subject><subject>Smooth muscle cells</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0011-2240</issn><issn>1090-2392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAQgEVoSLZp_0LQqTe7I9myrFtL6CMQKJTmLGRpRLXY1laSF_bf12a39LinYeCb50fII4OaAes-7mubTnEIcaw5gKiB1QD8huwYKKh4o_gbsgNgrOK8hXvyNuc9AHSyae_IPRN926zZjvx8nukxlBTpFB2ONJ9ywSlTHxPFoxkXU0KcafQ0TzGW33Rash2RWhxHmjAf4pyRlki3dQ6jyeX0jtx6M2Z8f4kP5PXrl19P36uXH9-enz6_VLblfakMk8q1XDiPwgDDruWq8Uo4KbjtB-kRjPMKxDBYLwczCN7LoZfOrdd1rWgeyIdz30OKfxbMRU8hb3uZGeOSdSelUD3IqyCHnolO9VdBJgWoTmxgdwZtijkn9PqQwmTSSTPQmx-91__86M2PBqZXP2vh42XCMkzo_pddhKzApzOA6-eOAZPONuBs0YWEtmgXw7UZfwGYaaXI</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Grassl, Erin D.</creator><creator>Bischof, John C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty</title><author>Grassl, Erin D. ; Bischof, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cryoplasty</topic><topic>Cryosurgery</topic><topic>Cryotherapy</topic><topic>Fibrin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Freezing injury</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Restenosis</topic><topic>Smooth muscle cells</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grassl, Erin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischof, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grassl, Erin D.</au><au>Bischof, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>162-173</pages><issn>0011-2240</issn><eissn>1090-2392</eissn><abstract>Restenosis is a major health care problem, with approximately 40% of angioplasties resulting in restenosis. Mechanisms related to elastic recoil, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis are implicated. In vivo studies have demonstrated the potential for cryotherapy to combat the process of restenosis, but the mechanisms whereby freezing and/or cooling can reduce or eliminate smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and ECM synthesis are not well known. While in vivo testing is ultimately necessary, in vitro models can provide important information on thermal parameters and mechanisms of injury. However, it is important to carefully choose the model system for in vitro work on cryoinjury characterization to adequately reflect the clinical situation. In this study, we examined the differences in response to cryoinjury by SMCs from different species (rat, pig, and human) and in different cellular environments (suspension vs. tissue equivalent). Tissue equivalents, composed of cells embedded in collagen or fibrin gel, provide a 3-D tissue-like environment, while allowing for controlled composition. As reported here, all SMCs showed similar trends, but rat cells appeared less sensitive to cooling at faster cooling rates in suspension, while human SMCs were less sensitive to temperatures just above freezing when embedded in collagen. In addition, the SMCs were less sensitive in suspension than they were in collagen. Cells in suspension exhibited 70% viability at −11 °C, whereas cells in the tissue equivalent model showed only 30% survival. Future studies will aim to more adequately represent the conditions in restenosis by providing inflammatory and proliferative cues to the cells.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15843006</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-2240
ispartof Cryobiology, 2005-04, Vol.50 (2), p.162-173
issn 0011-2240
1090-2392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67759807
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Angioplasty - methods
Animals
Cell Survival
Cryoplasty
Cryosurgery
Cryotherapy
Fibrin - pharmacology
Freezing injury
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Models, Biological
Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology
Rats
Restenosis
Smooth muscle cells
Species Specificity
Swine
title In vitro model systems for evaluation of smooth muscle cell response to cryoplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20model%20systems%20for%20evaluation%20of%20smooth%20muscle%20cell%20response%20to%20cryoplasty&rft.jtitle=Cryobiology&rft.au=Grassl,%20Erin%20D.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=162-173&rft.issn=0011-2240&rft.eissn=1090-2392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67759807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a179d425dfe5a01e64293f95d752c8b7fe0adf905bbcf7bab5287b87dd2396453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17509658&rft_id=info:pmid/15843006&rfr_iscdi=true