Loading…

Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND The authors compared the performance of screening mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women at genetically high risk for breast cancer. METHODS The authors conducted an international prospective study of screening mammography and MRI in asymptomatic, genetically high‐ri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2005-05, Vol.103 (9), p.1898-1905
Main Authors: Lehman, Constance D., Blume, Jeffrey D., Weatherall, Paul, Thickman, David, Hylton, Nola, Warner, Ellen, Pisano, Etta, Schnitt, Stuart J., Gatsonis, Constantine, Schnall, Mitchell
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND The authors compared the performance of screening mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women at genetically high risk for breast cancer. METHODS The authors conducted an international prospective study of screening mammography and MRI in asymptomatic, genetically high‐risk women age ≥ 25 years. Women with a history of breast cancer were eligible for a contralateral screening if they had been diagnosed within 5 years or a bilateral screening if they had been diagnosed > 5 years previously. All examinations (MRI, mammography, and clinical breast examination [CBE]) were performed within 90 days of each other. RESULTS In total, 390 eligible women were enrolled by 13 sites, and 367 women completed all study examinations. Imaging evaluations recommended 38 biopsies, and 27 biopsies were performed, resulting in 4 cancers diagnosed for an overall 1.1% cancer yield (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.3–2.8%). MRI detected all four cancers, whereas mammography detected one cancer. The diagnostic yield of mammography was 0.3% (95%CI, 0.01–1.5%). The yield of cancer by MRI alone was 0.8% (95%CI, − 0.3–2.0%). The biopsy recommendation rates for MRI and mammography were 8.5% (95%CI, 5.8–11.8%) and 2.2% (95%CI, 0.1–4.3%). CONCLUSIONS Screening MRI in high‐risk women was capable of detecting mammographically and clinically occult breast cancer. Screening MRI resulted in 22 of 367 of women (6%) who had negative mammogram and negative CBE examinations undergoing biopsy, resulting in 3 additional cancers detected. MRI also resulted in 19 (5%) false‐positive outcomes, which resulted in benign biopsies. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of screening mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women at genetically high risk for breast cancer. Screening MRI in high‐risk women was capable of detecting mammographically and clinically occult breast cancer.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.20971