Loading…

Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length

Proximal femoral bone strength is not only a function of femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but also a function of the spatial distribution of bone mass intrinsic in structural geometric properties such as diameter, area, length, and angle of the femoral neck. Recent advancements in bone density me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osteoporosis international 2006-04, Vol.17 (4), p.593-599
Main Authors: FAULKNER, K. G, WACKER, W. K, BARDEN, H. S, SIMONELLI, C, BURKE, P. K, RAGI, S, DEL RIO, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943
container_end_page 599
container_issue 4
container_start_page 593
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 17
creator FAULKNER, K. G
WACKER, W. K
BARDEN, H. S
SIMONELLI, C
BURKE, P. K
RAGI, S
DEL RIO, L
description Proximal femoral bone strength is not only a function of femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but also a function of the spatial distribution of bone mass intrinsic in structural geometric properties such as diameter, area, length, and angle of the femoral neck. Recent advancements in bone density measurement include software that can automatically calculate a variety of femoral structural variables that may be related to hip fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral bone density, structure, and strength assessments obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA) measurements in a group of women with and without hip fracture. DXA measurements of the proximal femur were obtained from 2,506 women 50 years of age or older, 365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls. In addition to the conventional densitometry measurements, structural variables were determined using the Hip Strength Analysis program, including hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), and the femur strength index (FSI) calculated as the ratio of estimated compressive yield strength of the femoral neck to the expected compressive stress of a fall on the greater trochanter. Femoral neck BMD was significantly lower and HAL significantly higher in the fracture group compared with controls. Mean CSMI was not significantly different between fracture patients and controls after adjustment for BMD and HAL. FSI, after adjustment for T score and HAL, was significantly lower in the fracture group, consistent with a reduced capacity to withstand a fall without fracturing a hip. We conclude that BMD, HAL, and FSI are significant independent predictors of hip fracture.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-005-0019-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67778289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1013106891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDcSBL2rJmmaNJcifsHAGwXxJiTpievo2pq0sP17220w8CY5Ic_7cngQuqTkjhIi7yMhVOUJIVkyTgk_QlPK0zRhSmTHaEpUKhPF6dcEncW4JENGKXmKJlRwLglRU_T9DKs-4NgFqH-6BS7rAta4DVCUrot4UbbYB-O6PsD2r4XhqDvceGybGvDwiGW3waYutrBZlxFX265zdOJNFeFif8_Q5_PTx-NrMn9_eXt8mCeOM9YlSjjmFFiqHPOZtaLIGAhjuacAvPCq8LawRIrcmZTQlALjhGWe5d5mXvF0hm53vW1ofnuInV6V0UFVmRqaPmohpcxZrgbw-h-4bPpQD7tpRvOcKc7HNrqDXGhiDOB1G8qVCRtNiR6t6511PVjX46THzNW-uLcrKA6JveYBuNkDJjpTDUZrV8YDJ4WgIlPpHwtniw4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218829444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>FAULKNER, K. G ; WACKER, W. K ; BARDEN, H. S ; SIMONELLI, C ; BURKE, P. K ; RAGI, S ; DEL RIO, L</creator><creatorcontrib>FAULKNER, K. G ; WACKER, W. K ; BARDEN, H. S ; SIMONELLI, C ; BURKE, P. K ; RAGI, S ; DEL RIO, L</creatorcontrib><description>Proximal femoral bone strength is not only a function of femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but also a function of the spatial distribution of bone mass intrinsic in structural geometric properties such as diameter, area, length, and angle of the femoral neck. Recent advancements in bone density measurement include software that can automatically calculate a variety of femoral structural variables that may be related to hip fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral bone density, structure, and strength assessments obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA) measurements in a group of women with and without hip fracture. DXA measurements of the proximal femur were obtained from 2,506 women 50 years of age or older, 365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls. In addition to the conventional densitometry measurements, structural variables were determined using the Hip Strength Analysis program, including hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), and the femur strength index (FSI) calculated as the ratio of estimated compressive yield strength of the femoral neck to the expected compressive stress of a fall on the greater trochanter. Femoral neck BMD was significantly lower and HAL significantly higher in the fracture group compared with controls. Mean CSMI was not significantly different between fracture patients and controls after adjustment for BMD and HAL. FSI, after adjustment for T score and HAL, was significantly lower in the fracture group, consistent with a reduced capacity to withstand a fall without fracturing a hip. We conclude that BMD, HAL, and FSI are significant independent predictors of hip fracture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0019-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16447009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Brazil ; Case-Control Studies ; Compressive Strength ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures ; Hip - anatomy &amp; histology ; Hip Fractures - diagnosis ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease ; Spain ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; United States</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2006-04, Vol.17 (4), p.593-599</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17661659$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16447009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FAULKNER, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACKER, W. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARDEN, H. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONELLI, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURKE, P. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAGI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEL RIO, L</creatorcontrib><title>Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Proximal femoral bone strength is not only a function of femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but also a function of the spatial distribution of bone mass intrinsic in structural geometric properties such as diameter, area, length, and angle of the femoral neck. Recent advancements in bone density measurement include software that can automatically calculate a variety of femoral structural variables that may be related to hip fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral bone density, structure, and strength assessments obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA) measurements in a group of women with and without hip fracture. DXA measurements of the proximal femur were obtained from 2,506 women 50 years of age or older, 365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls. In addition to the conventional densitometry measurements, structural variables were determined using the Hip Strength Analysis program, including hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), and the femur strength index (FSI) calculated as the ratio of estimated compressive yield strength of the femoral neck to the expected compressive stress of a fall on the greater trochanter. Femoral neck BMD was significantly lower and HAL significantly higher in the fracture group compared with controls. Mean CSMI was not significantly different between fracture patients and controls after adjustment for BMD and HAL. FSI, after adjustment for T score and HAL, was significantly lower in the fracture group, consistent with a reduced capacity to withstand a fall without fracturing a hip. We conclude that BMD, HAL, and FSI are significant independent predictors of hip fracture.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDcSBL2rJmmaNJcifsHAGwXxJiTpievo2pq0sP17220w8CY5Ic_7cngQuqTkjhIi7yMhVOUJIVkyTgk_QlPK0zRhSmTHaEpUKhPF6dcEncW4JENGKXmKJlRwLglRU_T9DKs-4NgFqH-6BS7rAta4DVCUrot4UbbYB-O6PsD2r4XhqDvceGybGvDwiGW3waYutrBZlxFX265zdOJNFeFif8_Q5_PTx-NrMn9_eXt8mCeOM9YlSjjmFFiqHPOZtaLIGAhjuacAvPCq8LawRIrcmZTQlALjhGWe5d5mXvF0hm53vW1ofnuInV6V0UFVmRqaPmohpcxZrgbw-h-4bPpQD7tpRvOcKc7HNrqDXGhiDOB1G8qVCRtNiR6t6511PVjX46THzNW-uLcrKA6JveYBuNkDJjpTDUZrV8YDJ4WgIlPpHwtniw4</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>FAULKNER, K. G</creator><creator>WACKER, W. K</creator><creator>BARDEN, H. S</creator><creator>SIMONELLI, C</creator><creator>BURKE, P. K</creator><creator>RAGI, S</creator><creator>DEL RIO, L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length</title><author>FAULKNER, K. G ; WACKER, W. K ; BARDEN, H. S ; SIMONELLI, C ; BURKE, P. K ; RAGI, S ; DEL RIO, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FAULKNER, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACKER, W. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARDEN, H. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONELLI, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURKE, P. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAGI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEL RIO, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FAULKNER, K. G</au><au>WACKER, W. K</au><au>BARDEN, H. S</au><au>SIMONELLI, C</au><au>BURKE, P. K</au><au>RAGI, S</au><au>DEL RIO, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>593-599</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Proximal femoral bone strength is not only a function of femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but also a function of the spatial distribution of bone mass intrinsic in structural geometric properties such as diameter, area, length, and angle of the femoral neck. Recent advancements in bone density measurement include software that can automatically calculate a variety of femoral structural variables that may be related to hip fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral bone density, structure, and strength assessments obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA) measurements in a group of women with and without hip fracture. DXA measurements of the proximal femur were obtained from 2,506 women 50 years of age or older, 365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls. In addition to the conventional densitometry measurements, structural variables were determined using the Hip Strength Analysis program, including hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), and the femur strength index (FSI) calculated as the ratio of estimated compressive yield strength of the femoral neck to the expected compressive stress of a fall on the greater trochanter. Femoral neck BMD was significantly lower and HAL significantly higher in the fracture group compared with controls. Mean CSMI was not significantly different between fracture patients and controls after adjustment for BMD and HAL. FSI, after adjustment for T score and HAL, was significantly lower in the fracture group, consistent with a reduced capacity to withstand a fall without fracturing a hip. We conclude that BMD, HAL, and FSI are significant independent predictors of hip fracture.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16447009</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-005-0019-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2006-04, Vol.17 (4), p.593-599
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67778289
source Springer Nature
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Brazil
Case-Control Studies
Compressive Strength
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Femur - anatomy & histology
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Fractures
Hip - anatomy & histology
Hip Fractures - diagnosis
Hip joint
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Medical sciences
Mortality
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease
Spain
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
United States
title Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A19%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femur%20strength%20index%20predicts%20hip%20fracture%20independent%20of%20bone%20density%20and%20hip%20axis%20length&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=FAULKNER,%20K.%20G&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=593-599&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-005-0019-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1013106891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-96c2c9eb19c2f5bb6d52e6ab4f1ee4df9dfbdb0768ca30131e24025f28fb5f943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218829444&rft_id=info:pmid/16447009&rfr_iscdi=true