Loading…

Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma

Diagnosing asthma is problematic when based solely on reported symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma in children. Skin‐prick testing (SPT) was undertaken in children aged 2–10 years with either no history of wheeze (n = 149) or recent d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric pulmonology 2005-06, Vol.39 (6), p.558-562
Main Authors: Chan, E.Y., Dundas, I., Bridge, P.D., Healy, M.J.R., McKenzie, S.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53
container_end_page 562
container_issue 6
container_start_page 558
container_title Pediatric pulmonology
container_volume 39
creator Chan, E.Y.
Dundas, I.
Bridge, P.D.
Healy, M.J.R.
McKenzie, S.A.
description Diagnosing asthma is problematic when based solely on reported symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma in children. Skin‐prick testing (SPT) was undertaken in children aged 2–10 years with either no history of wheeze (n = 149) or recent doctor‐observed wheeze which responded to treatment with a bronchodilator, the “gold standard” (n = 164). Children with moderate or severe asthma were excluded. SPT positivity increased sharply at age 5 years in wheezers. Data were therefore divided into two age groups: 2–
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ppul.20227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67797938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67797938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgitaPiz9A9qIHYXWSbJIdPEnrFxQVtBS8hDSbtbHb3bppUf-90Va9eQokz8xkXkL2KZxQAHY6my2qEwaMqTXSoYCYQoZynXRyJUQqc8m3yHYILwDxDekm2aIi58Bz7JCzh4mv01nr7SSZuzD39XNiQmKSwpvnuokXNjG-SMqmTezYV8W4aYoo5uOp2SUbpamC21udO2RwefHYvU77d1c33fN-ajkKlYoSwVqRUUaRAeQIwIWxTHCUDiVHQ11hzGgkMLMAmcrEyCEwnucoVSn4Djla9p21zesiflJPfbCuqkztmkXQUilUyPMIj5fQtk0IrSt1XGxq2g9NQX9Fpb-i0t9RRXyw6roYTV3xR1fZRHC4AiZYU5Wtqa0Pf04qZJSz6OjSvfnKffwzUt_fD_o_w9NljQ9z9_5bY9pJ3IYroYe3V1r2GRv2eqif-CcXdY2x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67797938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Chan, E.Y. ; Dundas, I. ; Bridge, P.D. ; Healy, M.J.R. ; McKenzie, S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, E.Y. ; Dundas, I. ; Bridge, P.D. ; Healy, M.J.R. ; McKenzie, S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnosing asthma is problematic when based solely on reported symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma in children. Skin‐prick testing (SPT) was undertaken in children aged 2–10 years with either no history of wheeze (n = 149) or recent doctor‐observed wheeze which responded to treatment with a bronchodilator, the “gold standard” (n = 164). Children with moderate or severe asthma were excluded. SPT positivity increased sharply at age 5 years in wheezers. Data were therefore divided into two age groups: 2–&lt;5 years (57 controls, 97 wheezers) and 5–10 years (92 controls, 67 wheezers). The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of SPT positivity for wheeze were 32%, 89%, and 2.9, respectively, in the younger children, and 82%, 85%, and 5.5, respectively, in the older children. For a prevalence of 30% for asthma, the positive predictive values of a positive SPT were 55% and 70% for the younger and older age groups, respectively. The test characteristics of SPT for helping diagnose asthma in schoolchildren are good. The prevalence of wheeze in preschool children is high, and so SPT should be helpful even in this group. We suggest that clinicians consider skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-6863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20227</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15830389</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEPUES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Asthma - diagnosis ; atopy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; diagnosis of asthma ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; skin prick test ; Skin Tests</subject><ispartof>Pediatric pulmonology, 2005-06, Vol.39 (6), p.558-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16792132$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15830389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, E.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dundas, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma</title><title>Pediatric pulmonology</title><addtitle>Pediatr. Pulmonol</addtitle><description>Diagnosing asthma is problematic when based solely on reported symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma in children. Skin‐prick testing (SPT) was undertaken in children aged 2–10 years with either no history of wheeze (n = 149) or recent doctor‐observed wheeze which responded to treatment with a bronchodilator, the “gold standard” (n = 164). Children with moderate or severe asthma were excluded. SPT positivity increased sharply at age 5 years in wheezers. Data were therefore divided into two age groups: 2–&lt;5 years (57 controls, 97 wheezers) and 5–10 years (92 controls, 67 wheezers). The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of SPT positivity for wheeze were 32%, 89%, and 2.9, respectively, in the younger children, and 82%, 85%, and 5.5, respectively, in the older children. For a prevalence of 30% for asthma, the positive predictive values of a positive SPT were 55% and 70% for the younger and older age groups, respectively. The test characteristics of SPT for helping diagnose asthma in schoolchildren are good. The prevalence of wheeze in preschool children is high, and so SPT should be helpful even in this group. We suggest that clinicians consider skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Asthma - diagnosis</subject><subject>atopy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>diagnosis of asthma</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>skin prick test</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><issn>8755-6863</issn><issn>1099-0496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgitaPiz9A9qIHYXWSbJIdPEnrFxQVtBS8hDSbtbHb3bppUf-90Va9eQokz8xkXkL2KZxQAHY6my2qEwaMqTXSoYCYQoZynXRyJUQqc8m3yHYILwDxDekm2aIi58Bz7JCzh4mv01nr7SSZuzD39XNiQmKSwpvnuokXNjG-SMqmTezYV8W4aYoo5uOp2SUbpamC21udO2RwefHYvU77d1c33fN-ajkKlYoSwVqRUUaRAeQIwIWxTHCUDiVHQ11hzGgkMLMAmcrEyCEwnucoVSn4Djla9p21zesiflJPfbCuqkztmkXQUilUyPMIj5fQtk0IrSt1XGxq2g9NQX9Fpb-i0t9RRXyw6roYTV3xR1fZRHC4AiZYU5Wtqa0Pf04qZJSz6OjSvfnKffwzUt_fD_o_w9NljQ9z9_5bY9pJ3IYroYe3V1r2GRv2eqif-CcXdY2x</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Chan, E.Y.</creator><creator>Dundas, I.</creator><creator>Bridge, P.D.</creator><creator>Healy, M.J.R.</creator><creator>McKenzie, S.A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma</title><author>Chan, E.Y. ; Dundas, I. ; Bridge, P.D. ; Healy, M.J.R. ; McKenzie, S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Asthma - diagnosis</topic><topic>atopy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>diagnosis of asthma</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>skin prick test</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, E.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dundas, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric pulmonology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, E.Y.</au><au>Dundas, I.</au><au>Bridge, P.D.</au><au>Healy, M.J.R.</au><au>McKenzie, S.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric pulmonology</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr. Pulmonol</addtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>558</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>558-562</pages><issn>8755-6863</issn><eissn>1099-0496</eissn><coden>PEPUES</coden><abstract>Diagnosing asthma is problematic when based solely on reported symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma in children. Skin‐prick testing (SPT) was undertaken in children aged 2–10 years with either no history of wheeze (n = 149) or recent doctor‐observed wheeze which responded to treatment with a bronchodilator, the “gold standard” (n = 164). Children with moderate or severe asthma were excluded. SPT positivity increased sharply at age 5 years in wheezers. Data were therefore divided into two age groups: 2–&lt;5 years (57 controls, 97 wheezers) and 5–10 years (92 controls, 67 wheezers). The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of SPT positivity for wheeze were 32%, 89%, and 2.9, respectively, in the younger children, and 82%, 85%, and 5.5, respectively, in the older children. For a prevalence of 30% for asthma, the positive predictive values of a positive SPT were 55% and 70% for the younger and older age groups, respectively. The test characteristics of SPT for helping diagnose asthma in schoolchildren are good. The prevalence of wheeze in preschool children is high, and so SPT should be helpful even in this group. We suggest that clinicians consider skin‐prick testing as a diagnostic aid for asthma. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15830389</pmid><doi>10.1002/ppul.20227</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-6863
ispartof Pediatric pulmonology, 2005-06, Vol.39 (6), p.558-562
issn 8755-6863
1099-0496
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67797938
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Age Factors
Asthma - diagnosis
atopy
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
children
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma
diagnosis of asthma
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Pneumology
Predictive Value of Tests
skin prick test
Skin Tests
title Skin-prick testing as a diagnostic aid for childhood asthma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skin-prick%20testing%20as%20a%20diagnostic%20aid%20for%20childhood%20asthma&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20pulmonology&rft.au=Chan,%20E.Y.&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=558&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=558-562&rft.issn=8755-6863&rft.eissn=1099-0496&rft.coden=PEPUES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ppul.20227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67797938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-5f90cc541219200890035ac25396e9639a1edaabb594c004745be902388967f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67797938&rft_id=info:pmid/15830389&rfr_iscdi=true