Loading…

Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: Feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach

The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of transradial catheterization in patients with remote surgical cardiac revascularization. Selective catheterization of coronary bypass grafts might be more difficult and time‐consuming from the radial artery as compared to the fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2006-04, Vol.67 (4), p.580-584
Main Authors: Sanmartin, Marcelo, Cuevas, Diogenes, Moxica, Joaquin, Valdes, Manuel, Esparza, Jose, Baz, Jose Antonio, Mantilla, Ramon, Iñiguez, Andres
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of transradial catheterization in patients with remote surgical cardiac revascularization. Selective catheterization of coronary bypass grafts might be more difficult and time‐consuming from the radial artery as compared to the femoral route. This special patient subset has been either excluded or underrepresented in previous studies. Retrospective review was made of 304 cardiac diagnostic procedures performed from January 2001 through December 2004 in patients with coronary artery bypass grafts in a single center. Patients had to be considered eligible for both transradial and transfemoral approach to be included. Cases with double internal mammary or gastroepiploic grafts were excluded. Selection of the arterial access was individualized according to operator preferences. Among diagnostic cases, transradial access was attempted as first choice in 151 cases (left radial in 133) and transfemoral in 154. Total procedural time (41 ± 22 vs. 40 ± 23 min), fluoroscopy time (15 ± 10 vs. 18 ± 13 min), and dye volume (180 ± 64 vs. 192 ± 73 ml) were similar. Crossover rates were 4.0% in the transradial group and 1.3% in transfemoral (P = 0.28). Only two patients in transradial group needed transfemoral access because of failure to catheterize a bypass graft. Transradial angiography of coronary bypass grafts can be performed with similar success rates as compared with transfemoral procedures and without a significant time delay. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.20633