Loading…

A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches

The morphological form of mixed sand and gravel beaches is distinct, and the process/response system and complex dynamics of these beaches are not well understood. Process response models developed for pure sand or gravel beaches cannot be directly applied to these beaches. The Canterbury Bight coas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental management (New York) 2006-06, Vol.37 (6), p.816-825
Main Authors: Eikaas, Hans S, Hemmingsen, Maree A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583
container_end_page 825
container_issue 6
container_start_page 816
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 37
creator Eikaas, Hans S
Hemmingsen, Maree A
description The morphological form of mixed sand and gravel beaches is distinct, and the process/response system and complex dynamics of these beaches are not well understood. Process response models developed for pure sand or gravel beaches cannot be directly applied to these beaches. The Canterbury Bight coastline is apparently abundantly supplied with sediments from large rivers and coastal alluvial cliffs, but a large part of this coastline is experiencing long-term erosion. Sediment budget models provide little evidence to suggest sediments are stored within this system. Current sediment budget models inadequately quantify and account for the processes responsible for the patterns of erosion and accretion of this coastline. We outline a new method to extrapolate from laboratory experiments to the field using a geographical information system approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Sediment samples from ten representative sites were tumbled in a concrete mixer for an equivalent distance of 40 km. From the textural mixture and weight loss over 40 km tumbling, we applied regression techniques to generate a predictive equation for Sediment Reduction Susceptibility (SRS). We used Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) to extrapolate the results from fifty-five sites with data on textural sediment composition to field locations with no data along the Canterbury Bight, creating a continuous sediment reductions susceptibility surface. Isolines of regular SRS intervals were then derived from the continuous surface to create a contour map of sediment reductions susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Results highlighted the variability in SRS along this coastline.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-004-0388-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67878976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20198952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EF-6qJ_d0KeINBBcqiJuQpqda6WVsWlGf3gwzILjRRcgi3_9zTj5C9hkcMwBzEgG4NhmAzEBYm32tkRmTgmfpNV8nMxBaZkzxxy2yHeMrwIJSm2SLaSWsZHZGnk7p5fUd9fP50PvwQseetn2JDY1Y1i12Ix2wnMJY9x2NUww4H-uiburxk_YVbesPLGn0XUkX53nw7ylaYGrCuEs2Kt9E3FvdO-Th4vz-7Cq7ub28Pju9yUKaZsy4yG2BwQRjRcF1GYJCpkGjNSCUUAG0VLby3EgeSm-1V0ZIDpIVaCplxQ45WvamFd4mjKNr6zRo0_gO-yk6bayxudF_gjxnQsF_QGC5zRVP4OEv8LWfhi5t6wzP0wdLYxLEllAY-hgHrNx8qFs_fDoGbuHRLT265NEtDLmvlDlYFU9Fi-VPYiVOfAOkMJdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>729418477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Eikaas, Hans S ; Hemmingsen, Maree A</creator><creatorcontrib>Eikaas, Hans S ; Hemmingsen, Maree A</creatorcontrib><description>The morphological form of mixed sand and gravel beaches is distinct, and the process/response system and complex dynamics of these beaches are not well understood. Process response models developed for pure sand or gravel beaches cannot be directly applied to these beaches. The Canterbury Bight coastline is apparently abundantly supplied with sediments from large rivers and coastal alluvial cliffs, but a large part of this coastline is experiencing long-term erosion. Sediment budget models provide little evidence to suggest sediments are stored within this system. Current sediment budget models inadequately quantify and account for the processes responsible for the patterns of erosion and accretion of this coastline. We outline a new method to extrapolate from laboratory experiments to the field using a geographical information system approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Sediment samples from ten representative sites were tumbled in a concrete mixer for an equivalent distance of 40 km. From the textural mixture and weight loss over 40 km tumbling, we applied regression techniques to generate a predictive equation for Sediment Reduction Susceptibility (SRS). We used Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) to extrapolate the results from fifty-five sites with data on textural sediment composition to field locations with no data along the Canterbury Bight, creating a continuous sediment reductions susceptibility surface. Isolines of regular SRS intervals were then derived from the continuous surface to create a contour map of sediment reductions susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Results highlighted the variability in SRS along this coastline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0388-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16538418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Bathing Beaches ; Beaches ; Concrete mixes ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Environmental management ; Geographic Information Systems ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; Gravel ; Models, Theoretical ; New Zealand ; Particle Size ; Regression Analysis ; Sand ; Sand &amp; gravel ; Sediment composition ; Sediment samplers ; Sediments ; Silicon Dioxide ; Soil erosion ; Water Movements</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2006-06, Vol.37 (6), p.816-825</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/729418477/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/729418477?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11666,27900,27901,36036,36037,44338,74864</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16538418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eikaas, Hans S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmingsen, Maree A</creatorcontrib><title>A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The morphological form of mixed sand and gravel beaches is distinct, and the process/response system and complex dynamics of these beaches are not well understood. Process response models developed for pure sand or gravel beaches cannot be directly applied to these beaches. The Canterbury Bight coastline is apparently abundantly supplied with sediments from large rivers and coastal alluvial cliffs, but a large part of this coastline is experiencing long-term erosion. Sediment budget models provide little evidence to suggest sediments are stored within this system. Current sediment budget models inadequately quantify and account for the processes responsible for the patterns of erosion and accretion of this coastline. We outline a new method to extrapolate from laboratory experiments to the field using a geographical information system approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Sediment samples from ten representative sites were tumbled in a concrete mixer for an equivalent distance of 40 km. From the textural mixture and weight loss over 40 km tumbling, we applied regression techniques to generate a predictive equation for Sediment Reduction Susceptibility (SRS). We used Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) to extrapolate the results from fifty-five sites with data on textural sediment composition to field locations with no data along the Canterbury Bight, creating a continuous sediment reductions susceptibility surface. Isolines of regular SRS intervals were then derived from the continuous surface to create a contour map of sediment reductions susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Results highlighted the variability in SRS along this coastline.</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Bathing Beaches</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Concrete mixes</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sand &amp; gravel</subject><subject>Sediment composition</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EF-6qJ_d0KeINBBcqiJuQpqda6WVsWlGf3gwzILjRRcgi3_9zTj5C9hkcMwBzEgG4NhmAzEBYm32tkRmTgmfpNV8nMxBaZkzxxy2yHeMrwIJSm2SLaSWsZHZGnk7p5fUd9fP50PvwQseetn2JDY1Y1i12Ix2wnMJY9x2NUww4H-uiburxk_YVbesPLGn0XUkX53nw7ylaYGrCuEs2Kt9E3FvdO-Th4vz-7Cq7ub28Pju9yUKaZsy4yG2BwQRjRcF1GYJCpkGjNSCUUAG0VLby3EgeSm-1V0ZIDpIVaCplxQ45WvamFd4mjKNr6zRo0_gO-yk6bayxudF_gjxnQsF_QGC5zRVP4OEv8LWfhi5t6wzP0wdLYxLEllAY-hgHrNx8qFs_fDoGbuHRLT265NEtDLmvlDlYFU9Fi-VPYiVOfAOkMJdI</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Eikaas, Hans S</creator><creator>Hemmingsen, Maree A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches</title><author>Eikaas, Hans S ; Hemmingsen, Maree A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Bathing Beaches</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Concrete mixes</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sand &amp; gravel</topic><topic>Sediment composition</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eikaas, Hans S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmingsen, Maree A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eikaas, Hans S</au><au>Hemmingsen, Maree A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>816</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>816-825</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>The morphological form of mixed sand and gravel beaches is distinct, and the process/response system and complex dynamics of these beaches are not well understood. Process response models developed for pure sand or gravel beaches cannot be directly applied to these beaches. The Canterbury Bight coastline is apparently abundantly supplied with sediments from large rivers and coastal alluvial cliffs, but a large part of this coastline is experiencing long-term erosion. Sediment budget models provide little evidence to suggest sediments are stored within this system. Current sediment budget models inadequately quantify and account for the processes responsible for the patterns of erosion and accretion of this coastline. We outline a new method to extrapolate from laboratory experiments to the field using a geographical information system approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Sediment samples from ten representative sites were tumbled in a concrete mixer for an equivalent distance of 40 km. From the textural mixture and weight loss over 40 km tumbling, we applied regression techniques to generate a predictive equation for Sediment Reduction Susceptibility (SRS). We used Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) to extrapolate the results from fifty-five sites with data on textural sediment composition to field locations with no data along the Canterbury Bight, creating a continuous sediment reductions susceptibility surface. Isolines of regular SRS intervals were then derived from the continuous surface to create a contour map of sediment reductions susceptibility for the Canterbury Bight. Results highlighted the variability in SRS along this coastline.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16538418</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-004-0388-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2006-06, Vol.37 (6), p.816-825
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67878976
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Link
subjects Accretion
Bathing Beaches
Beaches
Concrete mixes
Conservation of Natural Resources
Environmental management
Geographic Information Systems
Geologic Sediments - analysis
Gravel
Models, Theoretical
New Zealand
Particle Size
Regression Analysis
Sand
Sand & gravel
Sediment composition
Sediment samplers
Sediments
Silicon Dioxide
Soil erosion
Water Movements
title A GIS approach to model sediment reduction susceptibility of mixed sand and gravel beaches
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T07%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20GIS%20approach%20to%20model%20sediment%20reduction%20susceptibility%20of%20mixed%20sand%20and%20gravel%20beaches&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Eikaas,%20Hans%20S&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=816&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=816-825&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-004-0388-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20198952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2398bec7c783b26dcc5e1606e8703535c06458fa2742cda86a57342041be7f583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=729418477&rft_id=info:pmid/16538418&rfr_iscdi=true