Loading…

Dimensional structure of the SF-36 in neurological patients

Items were considered to load on (were related to) a factor if factor loadings exceeded 0.40 on that factor and were lower on the other factors. Because all items had ordinal scores and several subscale scores showed a skewed distribution, PCA was carried out using polychoric correlations instead of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2006-05, Vol.59 (5), p.541-543
Main Authors: Dallmeijer, A.J., Dekker, J., Knol, D.L., Kalmijn, S., Schepers, V.P.M., de Groot, V., Lindeman, E., Beelen, A., Lankhorst, G.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Items were considered to load on (were related to) a factor if factor loadings exceeded 0.40 on that factor and were lower on the other factors. Because all items had ordinal scores and several subscale scores showed a skewed distribution, PCA was carried out using polychoric correlations instead of Pearson correlations [11]. Other authors also found proportions of explained variance below 60% and deviating factor contents for the subscales with the physical and mental summary scores in patients with MS (9), stroke (8), and ALS (10) and raised questions about the use of the SF-36 summary scales in these populations.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.001