Loading…
Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research
A number of school‐based programs address sexual violence by focusing on adolescents' attitudes about rape or acceptance of rape myths. However, many problems exist in the literature regarding measurement of rape myth acceptance, including issues of reliability and validity. This paper addresse...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of school health 2005-02, Vol.75 (2), p.63-66 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3 |
container_end_page | 66 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | The Journal of school health |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Buhi, Eric R. |
description | A number of school‐based programs address sexual violence by focusing on adolescents' attitudes about rape or acceptance of rape myths. However, many problems exist in the literature regarding measurement of rape myth acceptance, including issues of reliability and validity. This paper addresses measurement reliability issues and reviews reliability reporting practices of studies using the Burt Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Less than one‐half of the 68 articles examined reported reliability coefficients for the data collected. Almost one‐third of the studies did not mention reliability. Examples of acceptable reliability reporting are provided. It is argued that reliability coefficients for the data actually analyzed should always be assessed and reported when interpreting program results. Implications for school health research and practice are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00012.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67890744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A131858052</galeid><ericid>EJ697049</ericid><sourcerecordid>A131858052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkluL00AUx4Mobl39BiJhHwQfEmcyt8QHYSlr1lKt1Bv4MkzSk-5006TOJNh-e09J6VLpizMPA3N-5_4PgitKYorn7SqmisuICknjhBARdwUhhCbx9lEwOpoeByNCkiTiLKMXwTPvVwgRxdTT4IKKLMlEJkaBmENtTWFr2-3COWxa19lmGX5xpuxsCT60TTg3Gwg_7bo7BDwYV949D55Upvbw4vBeBt8_3Hwb30bTWf5xfD2NSomZIlHJlDBemESVnKuKJVJyVqULk3FSFdkCKgEEhFRKiZTIlBopuKiSwoiMFcAug9dD3I1rf_fgO722voS6Ng20vddSpRlRnCN49Q-4anvXYG06wWGoVBCBUDRAS1ODtk3VdtjmEhpwpm4bqCx-X1NGUyxGJMjHZ3i8C1jb8qzDmxMHZDrYdkvTe6_TfHrKRufYsq1rWILGMY5np_y7gS9d672DSm-cXRu305TovSz0Su93r_e713tZ6IMs9BadXx3G0xdrWDy4HnSAwMsBAGfLo_lmIjNFeIbm94P5D3a8-4_MejL7eivZQ7fWY5fHAMbd4w6ZEvrn51znE6Z-KJnrX-wvV3TaLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215678505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Buhi, Eric R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buhi, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of school‐based programs address sexual violence by focusing on adolescents' attitudes about rape or acceptance of rape myths. However, many problems exist in the literature regarding measurement of rape myth acceptance, including issues of reliability and validity. This paper addresses measurement reliability issues and reviews reliability reporting practices of studies using the Burt Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Less than one‐half of the 68 articles examined reported reliability coefficients for the data collected. Almost one‐third of the studies did not mention reliability. Examples of acceptable reliability reporting are provided. It is argued that reliability coefficients for the data actually analyzed should always be assessed and reported when interpreting program results. Implications for school health research and practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00012.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15929595</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSHEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Attitude ; Crimes against ; Date rape ; Female ; Health education ; Humans ; Mythology ; Nontraditional Education ; Nursing ; Rape ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex crimes ; Sex Offenses ; Sexual Harassment ; Statistics ; Student attitudes ; Teenage girls ; Teenagers ; Truth Disclosure ; Violence</subject><ispartof>The Journal of school health, 2005-02, Vol.75 (2), p.63-66</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 American School Health Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 American School Health Association</rights><rights>Copyright American School Health Association Feb 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/215678505/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/215678505?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12827,21359,21375,21376,27905,27906,30980,33592,33593,33858,33859,34511,34512,43714,43861,44096,73970,74146,74388</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ697049$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15929595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buhi, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research</title><title>The Journal of school health</title><addtitle>J Sch Health</addtitle><description>A number of school‐based programs address sexual violence by focusing on adolescents' attitudes about rape or acceptance of rape myths. However, many problems exist in the literature regarding measurement of rape myth acceptance, including issues of reliability and validity. This paper addresses measurement reliability issues and reviews reliability reporting practices of studies using the Burt Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Less than one‐half of the 68 articles examined reported reliability coefficients for the data collected. Almost one‐third of the studies did not mention reliability. Examples of acceptable reliability reporting are provided. It is argued that reliability coefficients for the data actually analyzed should always be assessed and reported when interpreting program results. Implications for school health research and practice are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Crimes against</subject><subject>Date rape</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mythology</subject><subject>Nontraditional Education</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex Offenses</subject><subject>Sexual Harassment</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Teenage girls</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0022-4391</issn><issn>1746-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkluL00AUx4Mobl39BiJhHwQfEmcyt8QHYSlr1lKt1Bv4MkzSk-5006TOJNh-e09J6VLpizMPA3N-5_4PgitKYorn7SqmisuICknjhBARdwUhhCbx9lEwOpoeByNCkiTiLKMXwTPvVwgRxdTT4IKKLMlEJkaBmENtTWFr2-3COWxa19lmGX5xpuxsCT60TTg3Gwg_7bo7BDwYV949D55Upvbw4vBeBt8_3Hwb30bTWf5xfD2NSomZIlHJlDBemESVnKuKJVJyVqULk3FSFdkCKgEEhFRKiZTIlBopuKiSwoiMFcAug9dD3I1rf_fgO722voS6Ng20vddSpRlRnCN49Q-4anvXYG06wWGoVBCBUDRAS1ODtk3VdtjmEhpwpm4bqCx-X1NGUyxGJMjHZ3i8C1jb8qzDmxMHZDrYdkvTe6_TfHrKRufYsq1rWILGMY5np_y7gS9d672DSm-cXRu305TovSz0Su93r_e713tZ6IMs9BadXx3G0xdrWDy4HnSAwMsBAGfLo_lmIjNFeIbm94P5D3a8-4_MejL7eivZQ7fWY5fHAMbd4w6ZEvrn51znE6Z-KJnrX-wvV3TaLg</recordid><startdate>200502</startdate><enddate>200502</enddate><creator>Buhi, Eric R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>American School Health Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200502</creationdate><title>Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research</title><author>Buhi, Eric R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Crimes against</topic><topic>Date rape</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mythology</topic><topic>Nontraditional Education</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex Offenses</topic><topic>Sexual Harassment</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Teenage girls</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buhi, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of school health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buhi, Eric R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ697049</ericid><atitle>Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of school health</jtitle><addtitle>J Sch Health</addtitle><date>2005-02</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>63-66</pages><issn>0022-4391</issn><eissn>1746-1561</eissn><coden>JSHEAZ</coden><abstract>A number of school‐based programs address sexual violence by focusing on adolescents' attitudes about rape or acceptance of rape myths. However, many problems exist in the literature regarding measurement of rape myth acceptance, including issues of reliability and validity. This paper addresses measurement reliability issues and reviews reliability reporting practices of studies using the Burt Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Less than one‐half of the 68 articles examined reported reliability coefficients for the data collected. Almost one‐third of the studies did not mention reliability. Examples of acceptable reliability reporting are provided. It is argued that reliability coefficients for the data actually analyzed should always be assessed and reported when interpreting program results. Implications for school health research and practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>15929595</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00012.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4391 |
ispartof | The Journal of school health, 2005-02, Vol.75 (2), p.63-66 |
issn | 0022-4391 1746-1561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67890744 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociology Collection; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Attitude Crimes against Date rape Female Health education Humans Mythology Nontraditional Education Nursing Rape Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sex crimes Sex Offenses Sexual Harassment Statistics Student attitudes Teenage girls Teenagers Truth Disclosure Violence |
title | Reliability Reporting Practices in Rape Myth Research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20Reporting%20Practices%20in%20Rape%20Myth%20Research&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20school%20health&rft.au=Buhi,%20Eric%20R.&rft.date=2005-02&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=63-66&rft.issn=0022-4391&rft.eissn=1746-1561&rft.coden=JSHEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00012.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA131858052%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6073-5f68034ba27c447f326643f8da940fb9def5e0e56777580681a6545f2ba593be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215678505&rft_id=info:pmid/15929595&rft_galeid=A131858052&rft_ericid=EJ697049&rfr_iscdi=true |