Loading…
The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements
Two experiments used Müller-Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model ( S. Glover, 2002 ) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the durati...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.413-422 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863 |
| container_end_page | 422 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 413 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Mendoza, Jocelyn E Elliott, Digby Meegan, Daniel V Lyons, James L Welsh, Timothy N |
| description | Two experiments used Müller-Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model (
S. Glover, 2002
) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the duration of visual feedback for online control was manipulated. The authors found that the figures visible during movement planning and online control had additive effects on endpoint bias, even when participants had ample time to use visual feedback to modify their movements (Experiment 2). These findings are problematic not only for the planning-control model but also for
A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale's (1995)
two visual system explanation of illusory bias. Although our results are consistent with the idea that a single representation is used for perception, movement planning, and online control (e.g.,
V. H. Franz, 2001
), other work from our laboratory and elsewhere suggests that the manner in which space is coded depends on constraints associated with the specific task, such as the visual cues available to the performer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67899005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ934584</ericid><sourcerecordid>67899005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF-L1DAUxYMo7uzoFxCRIupbx_xrmjwuw6yuzKAP66shk966XdKkm7TifDff_GKmzLADXgLhcn7ncjgIvSJ4RTCrP2KsREkqylaMruiKE_YELYhiqiS0rp-ixSNwgS5Tusd5iKyeowsiBOOiVgv04_YOik3bgh2L0BZj3nZ__zgHsdweIBY3zk2pC77Ibxa_OeN9538WxjfFOvgxBjcbd8ZPxhVXXT-Lu_ALevBjeoGetcYleHn6l-j79eZ2_bncfv10s77alqYiciz3XDbUCCK42HPLakUoBgaN3SuiMJCm4lhKzrDElgulKgOGVaYB4EoyKdgSfTjeHWJ4mCCNuu-SBZfTQpiSFrVUCuMqg2__A-_DFH3OpgXh81QsQ_QI2RhSitDqIXa9iQdNsJ6r13Ozem5WM6qpztVn05vT5WnfQ3O2nLrOwPsTYJI1ro3G2y6dubpmjHGauddHDmJnH-XNF8V4lTtYondH2QxGD-lgTRw76yDp33fDOc4_lXmfuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614444453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Mendoza, Jocelyn E ; Elliott, Digby ; Meegan, Daniel V ; Lyons, James L ; Welsh, Timothy N</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Jocelyn E ; Elliott, Digby ; Meegan, Daniel V ; Lyons, James L ; Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments used Müller-Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model (
S. Glover, 2002
) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the duration of visual feedback for online control was manipulated. The authors found that the figures visible during movement planning and online control had additive effects on endpoint bias, even when participants had ample time to use visual feedback to modify their movements (Experiment 2). These findings are problematic not only for the planning-control model but also for
A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale's (1995)
two visual system explanation of illusory bias. Although our results are consistent with the idea that a single representation is used for perception, movement planning, and online control (e.g.,
V. H. Franz, 2001
), other work from our laboratory and elsewhere suggests that the manner in which space is coded depends on constraints associated with the specific task, such as the visual cues available to the performer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16634679</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cognitive Processes ; Distance Perception - physiology ; Feedback (Response) ; Feedback, Psychological - physiology ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graduate Students ; Human ; Humans ; Illusions (Perception) ; Intention ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Ontario ; Optical Illusions ; Perception ; Perceptual Motor Processes ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Planning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Skills ; Reference Values ; Space Perception - physiology ; Undergraduate Students ; Vision ; Visual Feedback ; Visual Stimulation ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.413-422</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ934584$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17733342$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16634679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Jocelyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Digby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meegan, Daniel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Two experiments used Müller-Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model (
S. Glover, 2002
) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the duration of visual feedback for online control was manipulated. The authors found that the figures visible during movement planning and online control had additive effects on endpoint bias, even when participants had ample time to use visual feedback to modify their movements (Experiment 2). These findings are problematic not only for the planning-control model but also for
A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale's (1995)
two visual system explanation of illusory bias. Although our results are consistent with the idea that a single representation is used for perception, movement planning, and online control (e.g.,
V. H. Franz, 2001
), other work from our laboratory and elsewhere suggests that the manner in which space is coded depends on constraints associated with the specific task, such as the visual cues available to the performer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Distance Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusions (Perception)</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Optical Illusions</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Motor Processes</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Skills</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Feedback</subject><subject>Visual Stimulation</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF-L1DAUxYMo7uzoFxCRIupbx_xrmjwuw6yuzKAP66shk966XdKkm7TifDff_GKmzLADXgLhcn7ncjgIvSJ4RTCrP2KsREkqylaMruiKE_YELYhiqiS0rp-ixSNwgS5Tusd5iKyeowsiBOOiVgv04_YOik3bgh2L0BZj3nZ__zgHsdweIBY3zk2pC77Ibxa_OeN9538WxjfFOvgxBjcbd8ZPxhVXXT-Lu_ALevBjeoGetcYleHn6l-j79eZ2_bncfv10s77alqYiciz3XDbUCCK42HPLakUoBgaN3SuiMJCm4lhKzrDElgulKgOGVaYB4EoyKdgSfTjeHWJ4mCCNuu-SBZfTQpiSFrVUCuMqg2__A-_DFH3OpgXh81QsQ_QI2RhSitDqIXa9iQdNsJ6r13Ozem5WM6qpztVn05vT5WnfQ3O2nLrOwPsTYJI1ro3G2y6dubpmjHGauddHDmJnH-XNF8V4lTtYondH2QxGD-lgTRw76yDp33fDOc4_lXmfuw</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Mendoza, Jocelyn E</creator><creator>Elliott, Digby</creator><creator>Meegan, Daniel V</creator><creator>Lyons, James L</creator><creator>Welsh, Timothy N</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements</title><author>Mendoza, Jocelyn E ; Elliott, Digby ; Meegan, Daniel V ; Lyons, James L ; Welsh, Timothy N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Distance Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusions (Perception)</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Optical Illusions</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Motor Processes</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Skills</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Feedback</topic><topic>Visual Stimulation</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Jocelyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Digby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meegan, Daniel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendoza, Jocelyn E</au><au>Elliott, Digby</au><au>Meegan, Daniel V</au><au>Lyons, James L</au><au>Welsh, Timothy N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ934584</ericid><atitle>The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>413-422</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>Two experiments used Müller-Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model (
S. Glover, 2002
) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the duration of visual feedback for online control was manipulated. The authors found that the figures visible during movement planning and online control had additive effects on endpoint bias, even when participants had ample time to use visual feedback to modify their movements (Experiment 2). These findings are problematic not only for the planning-control model but also for
A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale's (1995)
two visual system explanation of illusory bias. Although our results are consistent with the idea that a single representation is used for perception, movement planning, and online control (e.g.,
V. H. Franz, 2001
), other work from our laboratory and elsewhere suggests that the manner in which space is coded depends on constraints associated with the specific task, such as the visual cues available to the performer.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16634679</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.413-422 |
| issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67899005 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; PsycARTICLES; ERIC |
| subjects | Adult Bias Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Cognitive Processes Distance Perception - physiology Feedback (Response) Feedback, Psychological - physiology Foreign Countries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Graduate Students Human Humans Illusions (Perception) Intention Motor Skills - physiology Movement - physiology Ontario Optical Illusions Perception Perceptual Motor Processes Photic Stimulation - methods Planning Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Skills Reference Values Space Perception - physiology Undergraduate Students Vision Visual Feedback Visual Stimulation Visual Stimuli |
| title | The Effect of the Müller-Lyer Illusion on the Planning and Control of Manual Aiming Movements |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20the%20M%C3%BCller-Lyer%20Illusion%20on%20the%20Planning%20and%20Control%20of%20Manual%20Aiming%20Movements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Mendoza,%20Jocelyn%20E&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=413-422&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67899005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-b48d2a61646b4c379120e3edcb9190e1d5408843080c46995aea35adee4983863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614444453&rft_id=info:pmid/16634679&rft_ericid=EJ934584&rfr_iscdi=true |