Loading…
Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge
The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deli...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3 |
container_end_page | 577 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 556 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Fabrigar, Leandre R Petty, Richard E Smith, Steven M Crites, Stephen L |
description | The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67923570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37747112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmCrKqKh5QW6qEYVsJvU98uOEpWLqMSGri3HPi5TTTxT2wPK2zNRIiKxgNXZfOemH6FLgpcEM3WDMaUtE4QvDV7ypRDyBC2IYaYljIhTtPgDztCrUp4wxlxQ-hKdESm50UIs0PuHFCCX6lLo0mPzNQ2_egiP0NzFCL6WZkjNba1dnQK0H-CH-9kNuVkNqXSlQvLbC_Qiur7A60M9Rw8f776vPrf33z59Wd3et45zUduooo5ybTyXwI1nlHKvNQapwANzThCQTgQfNay1l1GBC8ZpokKQIHlk5-jdfu6Yh-cJSrWbrnjoe5dgmIqVylAmFP4vZEpxRQid4fVf8GmYcpqfsJLw-Wqm-b8QxUYTjAWZEd0jn4dSMkQ75m7j8tYSbHdR2V0SdpeENdhyO0c1N10dJk_rDYRjyyGbGbw9AFe862N2yXfl6JSSwpjd9jd750Znx7L1LtfO9zDTMh73_QZN5Kdi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614445384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCO_PsycARTICLES</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><description>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16649855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Action theory ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude ; Attitude Formation ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Consumer Behavior ; Empirical research ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goals ; Human ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regression analysis ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Behavior ; Social psychology ; Statistical analysis ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,33202,33203,33753</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17765991$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16649855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</description><subject>Action theory</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitude Formation</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmCrKqKh5QW6qEYVsJvU98uOEpWLqMSGri3HPi5TTTxT2wPK2zNRIiKxgNXZfOemH6FLgpcEM3WDMaUtE4QvDV7ypRDyBC2IYaYljIhTtPgDztCrUp4wxlxQ-hKdESm50UIs0PuHFCCX6lLo0mPzNQ2_egiP0NzFCL6WZkjNba1dnQK0H-CH-9kNuVkNqXSlQvLbC_Qiur7A60M9Rw8f776vPrf33z59Wd3et45zUduooo5ybTyXwI1nlHKvNQapwANzThCQTgQfNay1l1GBC8ZpokKQIHlk5-jdfu6Yh-cJSrWbrnjoe5dgmIqVylAmFP4vZEpxRQid4fVf8GmYcpqfsJLw-Wqm-b8QxUYTjAWZEd0jn4dSMkQ75m7j8tYSbHdR2V0SdpeENdhyO0c1N10dJk_rDYRjyyGbGbw9AFe862N2yXfl6JSSwpjd9jd750Znx7L1LtfO9zDTMh73_QZN5Kdi</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creator><creator>Petty, Richard E</creator><creator>Smith, Steven M</creator><creator>Crites, Stephen L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency</title><author>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Action theory</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitude Formation</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabrigar, Leandre R</au><au>Petty, Richard E</au><au>Smith, Steven M</au><au>Crites, Stephen L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>556-577</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16649855</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67923570 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCO_PsycARTICLES; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Action theory Analysis of Variance Attitude Attitude Formation Attitudes Behavior Behavioural psychology Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Consumer Behavior Empirical research Experiments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Goals Human Humans Knowledge Knowledge Level Personality Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Regression analysis Social attribution, perception and cognition Social Behavior Social psychology Statistical analysis Uncertainty |
title | Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Knowledge%20Effects%20on%20Attitude-Behavior%20Consistency:%20The%20Role%20of%20Relevance,%20Complexity,%20and%20Amount%20of%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Fabrigar,%20Leandre%20R&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=556-577&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37747112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614445384&rft_id=info:pmid/16649855&rfr_iscdi=true |