Loading…

Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge

The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577
Main Authors: Fabrigar, Leandre R, Petty, Richard E, Smith, Steven M, Crites, Stephen L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3
container_end_page 577
container_issue 4
container_start_page 556
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 90
creator Fabrigar, Leandre R
Petty, Richard E
Smith, Steven M
Crites, Stephen L
description The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67923570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37747112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmCrKqKh5QW6qEYVsJvU98uOEpWLqMSGri3HPi5TTTxT2wPK2zNRIiKxgNXZfOemH6FLgpcEM3WDMaUtE4QvDV7ypRDyBC2IYaYljIhTtPgDztCrUp4wxlxQ-hKdESm50UIs0PuHFCCX6lLo0mPzNQ2_egiP0NzFCL6WZkjNba1dnQK0H-CH-9kNuVkNqXSlQvLbC_Qiur7A60M9Rw8f776vPrf33z59Wd3et45zUduooo5ybTyXwI1nlHKvNQapwANzThCQTgQfNay1l1GBC8ZpokKQIHlk5-jdfu6Yh-cJSrWbrnjoe5dgmIqVylAmFP4vZEpxRQid4fVf8GmYcpqfsJLw-Wqm-b8QxUYTjAWZEd0jn4dSMkQ75m7j8tYSbHdR2V0SdpeENdhyO0c1N10dJk_rDYRjyyGbGbw9AFe862N2yXfl6JSSwpjd9jd750Znx7L1LtfO9zDTMh73_QZN5Kdi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614445384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCO_PsycARTICLES</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><description>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16649855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Action theory ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude ; Attitude Formation ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Consumer Behavior ; Empirical research ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goals ; Human ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regression analysis ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Behavior ; Social psychology ; Statistical analysis ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,33202,33203,33753</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17765991$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16649855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</description><subject>Action theory</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitude Formation</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmCrKqKh5QW6qEYVsJvU98uOEpWLqMSGri3HPi5TTTxT2wPK2zNRIiKxgNXZfOemH6FLgpcEM3WDMaUtE4QvDV7ypRDyBC2IYaYljIhTtPgDztCrUp4wxlxQ-hKdESm50UIs0PuHFCCX6lLo0mPzNQ2_egiP0NzFCL6WZkjNba1dnQK0H-CH-9kNuVkNqXSlQvLbC_Qiur7A60M9Rw8f776vPrf33z59Wd3et45zUduooo5ybTyXwI1nlHKvNQapwANzThCQTgQfNay1l1GBC8ZpokKQIHlk5-jdfu6Yh-cJSrWbrnjoe5dgmIqVylAmFP4vZEpxRQid4fVf8GmYcpqfsJLw-Wqm-b8QxUYTjAWZEd0jn4dSMkQ75m7j8tYSbHdR2V0SdpeENdhyO0c1N10dJk_rDYRjyyGbGbw9AFe862N2yXfl6JSSwpjd9jd750Znx7L1LtfO9zDTMh73_QZN5Kdi</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creator><creator>Petty, Richard E</creator><creator>Smith, Steven M</creator><creator>Crites, Stephen L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency</title><author>Fabrigar, Leandre R ; Petty, Richard E ; Smith, Steven M ; Crites, Stephen L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Action theory</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitude Formation</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabrigar, Leandre R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petty, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabrigar, Leandre R</au><au>Petty, Richard E</au><au>Smith, Steven M</au><au>Crites, Stephen L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>556-577</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>The role of properties of attitude-relevant knowledge in attitude-behavior consistency was explored in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, attitudes based on behaviorally relevant knowledge predicted behavior better than attitudes based on low-relevance knowledge, especially when people had time to deliberate. Relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge were investigated in Experiment 2. It was found that complexity increased attitude-behavior consistency when knowledge was of low-behavioral relevance. Under high-behavioral relevance, attitudes predicted behavior well regardless of complexity. Amount of knowledge had no effect on attitude-behavior consistency. In Experiment 3, the findings of Experiment 2 were replicated, and the complexity effect was extended to behaviors of ambiguous relevance. Together, these experiments support an attitude inference perspective, which holds that under high deliberation conditions, people consider the behavioral relevance and dimensional complexity of knowledge underlying their attitudes before deciding to act on them.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16649855</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-8575</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.556-577
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67923570
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCO_PsycARTICLES; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Action theory
Analysis of Variance
Attitude
Attitude Formation
Attitudes
Behavior
Behavioural psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Consumer Behavior
Empirical research
Experiments
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Goals
Human
Humans
Knowledge
Knowledge Level
Personality
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Regression analysis
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social Behavior
Social psychology
Statistical analysis
Uncertainty
title Understanding Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Knowledge%20Effects%20on%20Attitude-Behavior%20Consistency:%20The%20Role%20of%20Relevance,%20Complexity,%20and%20Amount%20of%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Fabrigar,%20Leandre%20R&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=556-577&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37747112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-f7f8f6b9c46e49c3224c880e67ece3aa51e6a5dcf8eb8c6f7ead9a817dd6e64f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614445384&rft_id=info:pmid/16649855&rfr_iscdi=true