Loading…
Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program
This study compares the screening history for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) with women with different stages and subtypes of cervical carcinoma. An analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Screening Program comparing all cases with a C...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer causes & control 2005-05, Vol.16 (4), p.463-474 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263 |
container_end_page | 474 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 463 |
container_title | Cancer causes & control |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Nygård, Jan F Nygård, Mari Skare, Gry B Thoresen, Steinar Ø |
description | This study compares the screening history for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) with women with different stages and subtypes of cervical carcinoma.
An analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Screening Program comparing all cases with a CIN 2/3/ACIS (N=8586) with all ICC (N=777) in the period 2000-2002. All Pap smears since 1992 were used to characterise detection mode and screening history. Multinominal regression models estimated the risk associated with detection mode and adequate Pap smear history.
A wide range of age at diagnosis, from 16 to 92 years of age was observed regardless of the stage of the disease. Fifty five percentage of the women diagnosed with CIN 2/3/ACIS had an adequate screening history. Of women diagnosed with SCC, 45.1% in stage I, and 10.5% in stage IV had an adequate history. The median age of women with CIN 2/3 (34 years) and squamous cervical carcinoma (SCC) stage I (37 years) given an adequate Pap smear history was not significantly different. For women with ACC, the proportion with adequate screening history was roughly 50% for all stages. After adjustment for detection mode and age, the OR for being diagnosed with ICC stage I compared to CIN 2/3 was 1.2 (95% CI: 1.0-1.5), while the OR of being diagnosed with ICC stage II-IV was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-4.8).
Women with CIN 2/3 and ICC stage I were similar with respect to screening histories, i.e. detection mode and age at diagnosis, while women with ICC stage II-IV seldom had an adequate screening history and were diagnosed at a significantly higher age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10552-004-6295-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67927141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67927141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggiwW7UP_EscMORQUqVQUJWFuOcz3jKrEHOzOj9uF4NjzNVJVY2br-zrm-9yD0lpKPlBB5kSkRglWE1FXDWlHdP0MrKiSvJGPiOVqRVshKsJqfoVc53xJCRMPIS3RGRSt4q9oV-vvTJoDgwxpvfJ5j8pBxdPgQJwj44OcN7q5uMLvg2MZpaxIMS3UBBm_WIebHog97k_0esIW099aM2JpQ7p-wwQnmFPMW7HwETDDjXfYPveYN4JuYDrD2JuAuxjT4YOZi2j3adA82-OmzP1JcJzO9Ri-cGTO8OZ3n6PeXy1_dt-r6-9er7vN1ZTlr5srQhrraKpC8d0Swxja8J_3gZG2oM0L0jAsGrVTlUbZMqdoRNZDeOa4oa_g5-rD4blP8s4M868lnC-NoAsRd1k0RSVrTAr7_D7yNu1SGzZpRTomiqi4QXSBbNpITOL1NfjLpTlOij8nqJVldktXHZPV90bw7Ge_6CYYnxSlK_g9QrKHa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213108184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Nygård, Jan F ; Nygård, Mari ; Skare, Gry B ; Thoresen, Steinar Ø</creator><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Jan F ; Nygård, Mari ; Skare, Gry B ; Thoresen, Steinar Ø</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the screening history for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) with women with different stages and subtypes of cervical carcinoma.
An analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Screening Program comparing all cases with a CIN 2/3/ACIS (N=8586) with all ICC (N=777) in the period 2000-2002. All Pap smears since 1992 were used to characterise detection mode and screening history. Multinominal regression models estimated the risk associated with detection mode and adequate Pap smear history.
A wide range of age at diagnosis, from 16 to 92 years of age was observed regardless of the stage of the disease. Fifty five percentage of the women diagnosed with CIN 2/3/ACIS had an adequate screening history. Of women diagnosed with SCC, 45.1% in stage I, and 10.5% in stage IV had an adequate history. The median age of women with CIN 2/3 (34 years) and squamous cervical carcinoma (SCC) stage I (37 years) given an adequate Pap smear history was not significantly different. For women with ACC, the proportion with adequate screening history was roughly 50% for all stages. After adjustment for detection mode and age, the OR for being diagnosed with ICC stage I compared to CIN 2/3 was 1.2 (95% CI: 1.0-1.5), while the OR of being diagnosed with ICC stage II-IV was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-4.8).
Women with CIN 2/3 and ICC stage I were similar with respect to screening histories, i.e. detection mode and age at diagnosis, while women with ICC stage II-IV seldom had an adequate screening history and were diagnosed at a significantly higher age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-6295-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15953989</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCCNEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cervical cancer ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening - organization & administration ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Norway - epidemiology ; Papanicolaou Test ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Survival Rate ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears</subject><ispartof>Cancer causes & control, 2005-05, Vol.16 (4), p.463-474</ispartof><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15953989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Jan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skare, Gry B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoresen, Steinar Ø</creatorcontrib><title>Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program</title><title>Cancer causes & control</title><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><description>This study compares the screening history for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) with women with different stages and subtypes of cervical carcinoma.
An analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Screening Program comparing all cases with a CIN 2/3/ACIS (N=8586) with all ICC (N=777) in the period 2000-2002. All Pap smears since 1992 were used to characterise detection mode and screening history. Multinominal regression models estimated the risk associated with detection mode and adequate Pap smear history.
A wide range of age at diagnosis, from 16 to 92 years of age was observed regardless of the stage of the disease. Fifty five percentage of the women diagnosed with CIN 2/3/ACIS had an adequate screening history. Of women diagnosed with SCC, 45.1% in stage I, and 10.5% in stage IV had an adequate history. The median age of women with CIN 2/3 (34 years) and squamous cervical carcinoma (SCC) stage I (37 years) given an adequate Pap smear history was not significantly different. For women with ACC, the proportion with adequate screening history was roughly 50% for all stages. After adjustment for detection mode and age, the OR for being diagnosed with ICC stage I compared to CIN 2/3 was 1.2 (95% CI: 1.0-1.5), while the OR of being diagnosed with ICC stage II-IV was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-4.8).
Women with CIN 2/3 and ICC stage I were similar with respect to screening histories, i.e. detection mode and age at diagnosis, while women with ICC stage II-IV seldom had an adequate screening history and were diagnosed at a significantly higher age.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mass Screening - organization & administration</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><issn>0957-5243</issn><issn>1573-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggiwW7UP_EscMORQUqVQUJWFuOcz3jKrEHOzOj9uF4NjzNVJVY2br-zrm-9yD0lpKPlBB5kSkRglWE1FXDWlHdP0MrKiSvJGPiOVqRVshKsJqfoVc53xJCRMPIS3RGRSt4q9oV-vvTJoDgwxpvfJ5j8pBxdPgQJwj44OcN7q5uMLvg2MZpaxIMS3UBBm_WIebHog97k_0esIW099aM2JpQ7p-wwQnmFPMW7HwETDDjXfYPveYN4JuYDrD2JuAuxjT4YOZi2j3adA82-OmzP1JcJzO9Ri-cGTO8OZ3n6PeXy1_dt-r6-9er7vN1ZTlr5srQhrraKpC8d0Swxja8J_3gZG2oM0L0jAsGrVTlUbZMqdoRNZDeOa4oa_g5-rD4blP8s4M868lnC-NoAsRd1k0RSVrTAr7_D7yNu1SGzZpRTomiqi4QXSBbNpITOL1NfjLpTlOij8nqJVldktXHZPV90bw7Ge_6CYYnxSlK_g9QrKHa</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Nygård, Jan F</creator><creator>Nygård, Mari</creator><creator>Skare, Gry B</creator><creator>Thoresen, Steinar Ø</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program</title><author>Nygård, Jan F ; Nygård, Mari ; Skare, Gry B ; Thoresen, Steinar Ø</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mass Screening - organization & administration</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Jan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skare, Gry B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoresen, Steinar Ø</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nygård, Jan F</au><au>Nygård, Mari</au><au>Skare, Gry B</au><au>Thoresen, Steinar Ø</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program</atitle><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>463-474</pages><issn>0957-5243</issn><eissn>1573-7225</eissn><coden>CCCNEN</coden><abstract>This study compares the screening history for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) with women with different stages and subtypes of cervical carcinoma.
An analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Screening Program comparing all cases with a CIN 2/3/ACIS (N=8586) with all ICC (N=777) in the period 2000-2002. All Pap smears since 1992 were used to characterise detection mode and screening history. Multinominal regression models estimated the risk associated with detection mode and adequate Pap smear history.
A wide range of age at diagnosis, from 16 to 92 years of age was observed regardless of the stage of the disease. Fifty five percentage of the women diagnosed with CIN 2/3/ACIS had an adequate screening history. Of women diagnosed with SCC, 45.1% in stage I, and 10.5% in stage IV had an adequate history. The median age of women with CIN 2/3 (34 years) and squamous cervical carcinoma (SCC) stage I (37 years) given an adequate Pap smear history was not significantly different. For women with ACC, the proportion with adequate screening history was roughly 50% for all stages. After adjustment for detection mode and age, the OR for being diagnosed with ICC stage I compared to CIN 2/3 was 1.2 (95% CI: 1.0-1.5), while the OR of being diagnosed with ICC stage II-IV was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-4.8).
Women with CIN 2/3 and ICC stage I were similar with respect to screening histories, i.e. detection mode and age at diagnosis, while women with ICC stage II-IV seldom had an adequate screening history and were diagnosed at a significantly higher age.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15953989</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10552-004-6295-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-5243 |
ispartof | Cancer causes & control, 2005-05, Vol.16 (4), p.463-474 |
issn | 0957-5243 1573-7225 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67927141 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adolescent Adult Age Distribution Aged Aged, 80 and over Cervical cancer Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology Cohort Studies Confidence Intervals Female Humans Logistic Models Mass Screening - organization & administration Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology Neoplasm Staging Norway - epidemiology Papanicolaou Test Registries Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Survival Rate Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Vaginal Smears |
title | Screening histories of women with CIN 2/3 compared with women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20histories%20of%20women%20with%20CIN%202/3%20compared%20with%20women%20diagnosed%20with%20invasive%20cervical%20cancer:%20a%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20Norwegian%20Coordinated%20Cervical%20Cancer%20Screening%20Program&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20causes%20&%20control&rft.au=Nyg%C3%A5rd,%20Jan%20F&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=463-474&rft.issn=0957-5243&rft.eissn=1573-7225&rft.coden=CCCNEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10552-004-6295-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67927141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-a161f4c8e73bf0526c63b0bdf74a1fa55b2352e978052792884f08d0bff381263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213108184&rft_id=info:pmid/15953989&rfr_iscdi=true |