Evolution of Clutch Size in Cavity‐Excavating Birds: The Nest Site Limitation Hypothesis Revisited

• Published in: The American naturalist 2006-03, Vol.167 (3), p.343-353
• Main Authors: Wiebe, Karen L., Koenig, Walter D., Martin, Kathy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal Migration; Animal reproduction; Animals; Aves; Beetles; Biological Evolution; Bird nesting; Birds; Birds - physiology; Clutch Size; Competition; Correlations; Diet; Evolution; Excavations; Models, Biological; Nesting Behavior; Nesting sites; Picidae; Predation; Scolytidae; Sittidae; Torticollis; Woodpeckers
• ISSN: 0003-0147; 1537-5323
• DOI: 10.1086/499373

There are two major competing hypotheses for variation in clutch size among cavity‐nesting species. The nest site limitation hypothesis postulates that nesting opportunities are more limited for weak excavators, which consequently invest more in each breeding attempt by laying larger clutches. Alternatively, clutch size may be determined by diet; the clutch sizes of strong excavators may be smaller because they are able to specialize on a more seasonally stable prey. We built a conceptual model that integrated hypotheses for interspecific variation in clutch size and tested it with comparative data on life‐history traits of woodpeckers (Picidae) and nuthatches (Sittidae). In most analyses, diet explained more variation in clutch size among species than did propensity to excavate. Migratory status was positively associated with clutch size but was difficult to distinguish from diet since resident species consumed more bark beetles (a prey available in winter) and had smaller clutches than migratory species. The literature suggests that cavities are not limited in natural, old‐growth forests. Although our data do not rule out nest site limitation, we conclude that annual stability of food resources has a larger impact on the evolution of clutch sizes in excavators than does limitation of nest sites.