Loading…

Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions

Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of oral sciences 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369
Main Authors: Elcock, Claire, Smith, Richard N., Simpson, Joanne, Abdellatif, Abeer, Bäckman, Birgitta, Brook, Alan H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003
container_end_page 369
container_issue s1
container_start_page 365
container_title European journal of oral sciences
container_volume 114
creator Elcock, Claire
Smith, Richard N.
Simpson, Joanne
Abdellatif, Abeer
Bäckman, Birgitta
Brook, Alan H.
description Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67935499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67935499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1BP3FqSNs2HtAsq20Ca2GGDHaOsTbWOtilJK7Z_T8qmccUXW_H7OvYDgIdggFw87gJEIPQhDcMghJAEEEaIBPsLMDw3LsEQcsh9xiIyADfW7iBEEeL0GgwQIRRThIdgnOiqkaawuvZ07lWq3erMerk2rpa2M6pSddu3todGN6W0bZF6pbKFru0tuMpladXdKY_A-3SySl78-WL2mjzN_RRDTHxKwtgFJmFKUsZiwmnMVbjBGcaYRLnbPU6Ze4GUE0bkJs9RyvBGqgwz7k4bgYfj3Mbor07ZVlSFTVVZylrpzgpCeRRjzp2QHYWp0dYalYvGFJU0B4Gg6MmJnegBiR6Q6MmJX3Ji76z3pz-6TaWyP-MJlROMj4LvolSHfw8Wk8XSFc7uH-2FbdX-bJfm060f0Vis32YieV6tP6Z8KabRD9czihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67935499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><description>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16674714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental Enamel - pathology ; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification ; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology ; Dental Impression Technique ; Dental Models ; Dentistry ; enamel ; Humans ; hypoplasia ; image analysis ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Observer Variation ; Odontometry - methods ; Photography, Dental - methods ; quantification ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16674714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdellatif, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</description><subject>Dental Enamel - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification</subject><subject>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>enamel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypoplasia</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Odontometry - methods</subject><subject>Photography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1BP3FqSNs2HtAsq20Ca2GGDHaOsTbWOtilJK7Z_T8qmccUXW_H7OvYDgIdggFw87gJEIPQhDcMghJAEEEaIBPsLMDw3LsEQcsh9xiIyADfW7iBEEeL0GgwQIRRThIdgnOiqkaawuvZ07lWq3erMerk2rpa2M6pSddu3todGN6W0bZF6pbKFru0tuMpladXdKY_A-3SySl78-WL2mjzN_RRDTHxKwtgFJmFKUsZiwmnMVbjBGcaYRLnbPU6Ze4GUE0bkJs9RyvBGqgwz7k4bgYfj3Mbor07ZVlSFTVVZylrpzgpCeRRjzp2QHYWp0dYalYvGFJU0B4Gg6MmJnegBiR6Q6MmJX3Ji76z3pz-6TaWyP-MJlROMj4LvolSHfw8Wk8XSFc7uH-2FbdX-bJfm060f0Vis32YieV6tP6Z8KabRD9czihg</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Elcock, Claire</creator><creator>Smith, Richard N.</creator><creator>Simpson, Joanne</creator><creator>Abdellatif, Abeer</creator><creator>Bäckman, Birgitta</creator><creator>Brook, Alan H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><author>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Dental Enamel - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification</topic><topic>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>enamel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypoplasia</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Odontometry - methods</topic><topic>Photography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdellatif, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elcock, Claire</au><au>Smith, Richard N.</au><au>Simpson, Joanne</au><au>Abdellatif, Abeer</au><au>Bäckman, Birgitta</au><au>Brook, Alan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>365-369</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16674714</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0909-8836
ispartof European journal of oral sciences, 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369
issn 0909-8836
1600-0722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67935499
source Wiley
subjects Dental Enamel - pathology
Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification
Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology
Dental Impression Technique
Dental Models
Dentistry
enamel
Humans
hypoplasia
image analysis
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Observer Variation
Odontometry - methods
Photography, Dental - methods
quantification
Reproducibility of Results
title Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20measurement%20of%20hypoplastic%20lesions&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Elcock,%20Claire&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=365-369&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67935499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67935499&rft_id=info:pmid/16674714&rfr_iscdi=true