Loading…
Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions
Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of oral sciences 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003 |
container_end_page | 369 |
container_issue | s1 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | European journal of oral sciences |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Elcock, Claire Smith, Richard N. Simpson, Joanne Abdellatif, Abeer Bäckman, Birgitta Brook, Alan H. |
description | Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67935499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67935499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1BP3FqSNs2HtAsq20Ca2GGDHaOsTbWOtilJK7Z_T8qmccUXW_H7OvYDgIdggFw87gJEIPQhDcMghJAEEEaIBPsLMDw3LsEQcsh9xiIyADfW7iBEEeL0GgwQIRRThIdgnOiqkaawuvZ07lWq3erMerk2rpa2M6pSddu3todGN6W0bZF6pbKFru0tuMpladXdKY_A-3SySl78-WL2mjzN_RRDTHxKwtgFJmFKUsZiwmnMVbjBGcaYRLnbPU6Ze4GUE0bkJs9RyvBGqgwz7k4bgYfj3Mbor07ZVlSFTVVZylrpzgpCeRRjzp2QHYWp0dYalYvGFJU0B4Gg6MmJnegBiR6Q6MmJX3Ji76z3pz-6TaWyP-MJlROMj4LvolSHfw8Wk8XSFc7uH-2FbdX-bJfm060f0Vis32YieV6tP6Z8KabRD9czihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67935499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><description>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16674714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental Enamel - pathology ; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification ; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology ; Dental Impression Technique ; Dental Models ; Dentistry ; enamel ; Humans ; hypoplasia ; image analysis ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Observer Variation ; Odontometry - methods ; Photography, Dental - methods ; quantification ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16674714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdellatif, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</description><subject>Dental Enamel - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification</subject><subject>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>enamel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypoplasia</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Odontometry - methods</subject><subject>Photography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1BP3FqSNs2HtAsq20Ca2GGDHaOsTbWOtilJK7Z_T8qmccUXW_H7OvYDgIdggFw87gJEIPQhDcMghJAEEEaIBPsLMDw3LsEQcsh9xiIyADfW7iBEEeL0GgwQIRRThIdgnOiqkaawuvZ07lWq3erMerk2rpa2M6pSddu3todGN6W0bZF6pbKFru0tuMpladXdKY_A-3SySl78-WL2mjzN_RRDTHxKwtgFJmFKUsZiwmnMVbjBGcaYRLnbPU6Ze4GUE0bkJs9RyvBGqgwz7k4bgYfj3Mbor07ZVlSFTVVZylrpzgpCeRRjzp2QHYWp0dYalYvGFJU0B4Gg6MmJnegBiR6Q6MmJX3Ji76z3pz-6TaWyP-MJlROMj4LvolSHfw8Wk8XSFc7uH-2FbdX-bJfm060f0Vis32YieV6tP6Z8KabRD9czihg</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Elcock, Claire</creator><creator>Smith, Richard N.</creator><creator>Simpson, Joanne</creator><creator>Abdellatif, Abeer</creator><creator>Bäckman, Birgitta</creator><creator>Brook, Alan H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</title><author>Elcock, Claire ; Smith, Richard N. ; Simpson, Joanne ; Abdellatif, Abeer ; Bäckman, Birgitta ; Brook, Alan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Dental Enamel - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification</topic><topic>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>enamel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypoplasia</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Odontometry - methods</topic><topic>Photography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elcock, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdellatif, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Alan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elcock, Claire</au><au>Smith, Richard N.</au><au>Simpson, Joanne</au><au>Abdellatif, Abeer</au><au>Bäckman, Birgitta</au><au>Brook, Alan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>365-369</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>Enamel hypoplasia is a quantitative defect of enamel thickness. Methods previously used for its measurement have limitations in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate new methods of measurement using image analysis. Lesions on 8 teeth affected by enamel hypoplasia were quantified from study models and impression surfaces using an image‐analysis system. The measurements made included lesion area and tooth surface area; from these the proportion of tooth surface area affected was calculated. For comparison, manual measurement was performed on impression surfaces and study models, using digital callipers. Images were also acquired of lesions on 12 exfoliated teeth, and the lesion area and total tooth area were calculated. For assessment of intra‐operator reliability, the +/– repeatability coefficient was calculated. Measurement of the surface of lesions direct from the exfoliated teeth gave the best results overall, followed by direct image analysis of the silicone impression.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16674714</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0909-8836 |
ispartof | European journal of oral sciences, 2006-05, Vol.114 (s1), p.365-369 |
issn | 0909-8836 1600-0722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67935499 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Dental Enamel - pathology Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - classification Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - pathology Dental Impression Technique Dental Models Dentistry enamel Humans hypoplasia image analysis Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Observer Variation Odontometry - methods Photography, Dental - methods quantification Reproducibility of Results |
title | Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20measurement%20of%20hypoplastic%20lesions&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Elcock,%20Claire&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=365-369&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00316.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67935499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4046-7625555462c6c88569759e2b4d44463f0315c89e2079686abff1c84baed489003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67935499&rft_id=info:pmid/16674714&rfr_iscdi=true |