Loading…

Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults

African Americans have a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) than do whites. Whether the composition of FFM at the organ-tissue level differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference could account for differences by race in REE are u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 2006-05, Vol.83 (5), p.1062-1067
Main Authors: GALLAGHER, Dympna, ALBU, Jeanine, QING HE, HESHKA, Stanley, BOXT, Lawrence, KRASNOW, Norman, ELIA, Marinos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813
container_end_page 1067
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1062
container_title The American journal of clinical nutrition
container_volume 83
creator GALLAGHER, Dympna
ALBU, Jeanine
QING HE
HESHKA, Stanley
BOXT, Lawrence
KRASNOW, Norman
ELIA, Marinos
description African Americans have a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) than do whites. Whether the composition of FFM at the organ-tissue level differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference could account for differences by race in REE are unknown. The objectives were to quantify FFM in vivo in women and men at the organ-tissue level and to ascertain whether the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs and tissues differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference can account for differences in REE. The study was a cross-sectional evaluation of 64 women (n = 34 African Americans, 30 whites) and 35 men (n = 8 African Americans, 27 whites). Magnetic resonance imaging measures of liver, kidney, heart, spleen, brain, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of fat and FFM were acquired. REE was measured by using indirect calorimetry. The mass of selected high-metabolic-rate organs (sum of liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, and brain) after adjustment for fat, FFM, sex, and age was significantly (P < 0.001) smaller in African Americans than in whites (3.1 and 3.4 kg, respectively; x +/- SEE difference: 0.30 +/- 0.06 kg). In a multiple regression analysis with fat, FFM, sex, age, and race as predictors of REE, the addition of the total mass rendered race nonsignificant. Racial differences in REE were reduced by >50% and were no longer significant when the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs was considered. Differences in FFM composition may be responsible for the reported REE differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67950519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1061402571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2P0zAQxS0EYkvhyhFZSOytXX_Ejn1BWq1YQFqJA3C2Jq6TuHKcYieU_vc4asUCF4-t9_PTzDyEXlOypUTzG9jbeKP4VpSnZE_QimquNpyR-ilaEULYRlMprtCLnPeEUFYp-RxdUSmVIFW9QqevA4SAx9RBzPjopx4D7n3X48FN0IzBW5xgctj9OgTwEYfx6BJOLk8-dthFl7rTIrq489OcHC7MbZu8hVIHd75MfTmKcOx9sYLdHKb8Ej1rIWT36lLX6Pv9h293nzYPXz5-vrt92NiqElMZpbFNbd1OKw1tU1EhCdEVBSmZlLRqGQHtmKyAMmU5NIrqpihM2MIqytfo_dn3MDeD21kXpwTBHJIfIJ3MCN78q0Tfm278aaiqaikWg-uLQRp_zGVwM_hsXQgQ3ThnI2stiCh7X6O3_4H7cU6xDGcYp1pwohZoe4ZsGnNOrv3TCSVmidQskRrFjTBLpOXDm7_7f8QvGRbg3QWAbCG0CaL1-ZGra1XWQPlvWn-rhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231953089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>GALLAGHER, Dympna ; ALBU, Jeanine ; QING HE ; HESHKA, Stanley ; BOXT, Lawrence ; KRASNOW, Norman ; ELIA, Marinos</creator><creatorcontrib>GALLAGHER, Dympna ; ALBU, Jeanine ; QING HE ; HESHKA, Stanley ; BOXT, Lawrence ; KRASNOW, Norman ; ELIA, Marinos</creatorcontrib><description>African Americans have a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) than do whites. Whether the composition of FFM at the organ-tissue level differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference could account for differences by race in REE are unknown. The objectives were to quantify FFM in vivo in women and men at the organ-tissue level and to ascertain whether the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs and tissues differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference can account for differences in REE. The study was a cross-sectional evaluation of 64 women (n = 34 African Americans, 30 whites) and 35 men (n = 8 African Americans, 27 whites). Magnetic resonance imaging measures of liver, kidney, heart, spleen, brain, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of fat and FFM were acquired. REE was measured by using indirect calorimetry. The mass of selected high-metabolic-rate organs (sum of liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, and brain) after adjustment for fat, FFM, sex, and age was significantly (P &lt; 0.001) smaller in African Americans than in whites (3.1 and 3.4 kg, respectively; x +/- SEE difference: 0.30 +/- 0.06 kg). In a multiple regression analysis with fat, FFM, sex, age, and race as predictors of REE, the addition of the total mass rendered race nonsignificant. Racial differences in REE were reduced by &gt;50% and were no longer significant when the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs was considered. Differences in FFM composition may be responsible for the reported REE differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16685047</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCNAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Society for Clinical Nutrition</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adipose Tissue ; Anatomy & physiology ; Basal Metabolism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Black or African American ; Black people ; Body Composition ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Energy efficiency ; Energy Metabolism ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heart - anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Kidney - anatomy & histology ; Liver - anatomy & histology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Metabolism ; Racial differences ; Regression Analysis ; Spleen - anatomy & histology ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; White People]]></subject><ispartof>The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2006-05, Vol.83 (5), p.1062-1067</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17788131$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16685047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GALLAGHER, Dympna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBU, Jeanine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QING HE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HESHKA, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOXT, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRASNOW, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELIA, Marinos</creatorcontrib><title>Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults</title><title>The American journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>African Americans have a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) than do whites. Whether the composition of FFM at the organ-tissue level differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference could account for differences by race in REE are unknown. The objectives were to quantify FFM in vivo in women and men at the organ-tissue level and to ascertain whether the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs and tissues differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference can account for differences in REE. The study was a cross-sectional evaluation of 64 women (n = 34 African Americans, 30 whites) and 35 men (n = 8 African Americans, 27 whites). Magnetic resonance imaging measures of liver, kidney, heart, spleen, brain, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of fat and FFM were acquired. REE was measured by using indirect calorimetry. The mass of selected high-metabolic-rate organs (sum of liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, and brain) after adjustment for fat, FFM, sex, and age was significantly (P &lt; 0.001) smaller in African Americans than in whites (3.1 and 3.4 kg, respectively; x +/- SEE difference: 0.30 +/- 0.06 kg). In a multiple regression analysis with fat, FFM, sex, age, and race as predictors of REE, the addition of the total mass rendered race nonsignificant. Racial differences in REE were reduced by &gt;50% and were no longer significant when the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs was considered. Differences in FFM composition may be responsible for the reported REE differences.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue</subject><subject>Anatomy &amp; physiology</subject><subject>Basal Metabolism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Black or African American</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Liver - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Spleen - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>White People</subject><issn>0002-9165</issn><issn>1938-3207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc2P0zAQxS0EYkvhyhFZSOytXX_Ejn1BWq1YQFqJA3C2Jq6TuHKcYieU_vc4asUCF4-t9_PTzDyEXlOypUTzG9jbeKP4VpSnZE_QimquNpyR-ilaEULYRlMprtCLnPeEUFYp-RxdUSmVIFW9QqevA4SAx9RBzPjopx4D7n3X48FN0IzBW5xgctj9OgTwEYfx6BJOLk8-dthFl7rTIrq489OcHC7MbZu8hVIHd75MfTmKcOx9sYLdHKb8Ej1rIWT36lLX6Pv9h293nzYPXz5-vrt92NiqElMZpbFNbd1OKw1tU1EhCdEVBSmZlLRqGQHtmKyAMmU5NIrqpihM2MIqytfo_dn3MDeD21kXpwTBHJIfIJ3MCN78q0Tfm278aaiqaikWg-uLQRp_zGVwM_hsXQgQ3ThnI2stiCh7X6O3_4H7cU6xDGcYp1pwohZoe4ZsGnNOrv3TCSVmidQskRrFjTBLpOXDm7_7f8QvGRbg3QWAbCG0CaL1-ZGra1XWQPlvWn-rhA</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>GALLAGHER, Dympna</creator><creator>ALBU, Jeanine</creator><creator>QING HE</creator><creator>HESHKA, Stanley</creator><creator>BOXT, Lawrence</creator><creator>KRASNOW, Norman</creator><creator>ELIA, Marinos</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults</title><author>GALLAGHER, Dympna ; ALBU, Jeanine ; QING HE ; HESHKA, Stanley ; BOXT, Lawrence ; KRASNOW, Norman ; ELIA, Marinos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue</topic><topic>Anatomy &amp; physiology</topic><topic>Basal Metabolism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Black or African American</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Liver - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Spleen - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>White People</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GALLAGHER, Dympna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBU, Jeanine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QING HE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HESHKA, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOXT, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRASNOW, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELIA, Marinos</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GALLAGHER, Dympna</au><au>ALBU, Jeanine</au><au>QING HE</au><au>HESHKA, Stanley</au><au>BOXT, Lawrence</au><au>KRASNOW, Norman</au><au>ELIA, Marinos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1062</spage><epage>1067</epage><pages>1062-1067</pages><issn>0002-9165</issn><eissn>1938-3207</eissn><coden>AJCNAC</coden><abstract>African Americans have a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) than do whites. Whether the composition of FFM at the organ-tissue level differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference could account for differences by race in REE are unknown. The objectives were to quantify FFM in vivo in women and men at the organ-tissue level and to ascertain whether the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs and tissues differs between African Americans and whites and, if so, whether that difference can account for differences in REE. The study was a cross-sectional evaluation of 64 women (n = 34 African Americans, 30 whites) and 35 men (n = 8 African Americans, 27 whites). Magnetic resonance imaging measures of liver, kidney, heart, spleen, brain, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of fat and FFM were acquired. REE was measured by using indirect calorimetry. The mass of selected high-metabolic-rate organs (sum of liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, and brain) after adjustment for fat, FFM, sex, and age was significantly (P &lt; 0.001) smaller in African Americans than in whites (3.1 and 3.4 kg, respectively; x +/- SEE difference: 0.30 +/- 0.06 kg). In a multiple regression analysis with fat, FFM, sex, age, and race as predictors of REE, the addition of the total mass rendered race nonsignificant. Racial differences in REE were reduced by &gt;50% and were no longer significant when the mass of specific high-metabolic-rate organs was considered. Differences in FFM composition may be responsible for the reported REE differences.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</pub><pmid>16685047</pmid><doi>10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1062</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9165
ispartof The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2006-05, Vol.83 (5), p.1062-1067
issn 0002-9165
1938-3207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67950519
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adipose Tissue
Anatomy & physiology
Basal Metabolism
Biological and medical sciences
Black or African American
Black people
Body Composition
Brain - anatomy & histology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Energy efficiency
Energy Metabolism
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heart - anatomy & histology
Humans
Kidney - anatomy & histology
Liver - anatomy & histology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Metabolism
Racial differences
Regression Analysis
Spleen - anatomy & histology
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
White People
title Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A14%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20organs%20with%20a%20high%20metabolic%20rate%20explain%20lower%20resting%20energy%20expenditure%20in%20African%20American%20than%20in%20white%20adults&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=GALLAGHER,%20Dympna&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1062&rft.epage=1067&rft.pages=1062-1067&rft.issn=0002-9165&rft.eissn=1938-3207&rft.coden=AJCNAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1061402571%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-32bcb7ced989afb415600941a6626614f20a9e264a128c3ab819b26625c415813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231953089&rft_id=info:pmid/16685047&rfr_iscdi=true