Loading…
Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pu...
Saved in:
Published in: | European urology 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Hofmann, Hans-Stefan Neef, Heinz Krohe, Katharina Andreev, Petko Silber, Rolf-Edgar |
description | Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy.
Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.
The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (
R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and
R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months).
Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030228380500134X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67953067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5GcvCVOstmPXAQpVgXFUvUmLJvNVLY02bqbFPz3bmnBm5eZy_POx0PIZQ5ZDjm_WWU4-MG7rABgGdAMoDwi41wKmgrG4ZiMgUKRFpLKETkLYQUAlFX0lIxyVnFRMDYmn3PvvjoXemuSmTa98yHRXZO8DX5rt3qd6GWPPpkP69Z12v8kCwxoeuu6xC2TF-x16PUuvMAu0lNcx6K9sZ1r9Tk5Wep1wItDn5CP2f379DF9fn14mt49p6YseJ9WKDmy0kgTzzJVTWVRUJmXRmshZRkZ2siqzOuKoRCCQV0BawowkgM0HOmEXO_nbrz7HjD0qrXBxFN0h24IiouKUeAiguUeNN6F4HGpNt628S2Vg9pZVSu1t6p2VhVQFa3G2NVh_lC32PyFDhojcLsHMH65tehVMBY7g4310ZZqnP1_wy8EYYps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><description>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy.
Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.
The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (
R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and
R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months).
Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15967255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - mortality ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Lung metastasis ; Lung Neoplasms - mortality ; Lung Neoplasms - secondary ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrectomy ; Pneumonectomy ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factors ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15967255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krohe, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Petko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy.
Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.
The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (
R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and
R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months).
Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</description><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Lung metastasis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5GcvCVOstmPXAQpVgXFUvUmLJvNVLY02bqbFPz3bmnBm5eZy_POx0PIZQ5ZDjm_WWU4-MG7rABgGdAMoDwi41wKmgrG4ZiMgUKRFpLKETkLYQUAlFX0lIxyVnFRMDYmn3PvvjoXemuSmTa98yHRXZO8DX5rt3qd6GWPPpkP69Z12v8kCwxoeuu6xC2TF-x16PUuvMAu0lNcx6K9sZ1r9Tk5Wep1wItDn5CP2f379DF9fn14mt49p6YseJ9WKDmy0kgTzzJVTWVRUJmXRmshZRkZ2siqzOuKoRCCQV0BawowkgM0HOmEXO_nbrz7HjD0qrXBxFN0h24IiouKUeAiguUeNN6F4HGpNt628S2Vg9pZVSu1t6p2VhVQFa3G2NVh_lC32PyFDhojcLsHMH65tehVMBY7g4310ZZqnP1_wy8EYYps</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creator><creator>Neef, Heinz</creator><creator>Krohe, Katharina</creator><creator>Andreev, Petko</creator><creator>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Lung metastasis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krohe, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Petko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</au><au>Neef, Heinz</au><au>Krohe, Katharina</au><au>Andreev, Petko</au><au>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>77-82</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy.
Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.
The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (
R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and
R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months).
Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15967255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953067 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery Disease-Free Survival Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Kidney Neoplasms - mortality Kidney Neoplasms - pathology Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Lung metastasis Lung Neoplasms - mortality Lung Neoplasms - secondary Lung Neoplasms - surgery Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Nephrectomy Pneumonectomy Prognosis Prognostic factors Renal cell carcinoma Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Survival Survival Rate Time Factors |
title | Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20Factors%20and%20Survival%20after%20Pulmonary%20Resection%20of%20Metastatic%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Hofmann,%20Hans-Stefan&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=77-82&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67953067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953067&rft_id=info:pmid/15967255&rfr_iscdi=true |