Loading…

Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urology 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82
Main Authors: Hofmann, Hans-Stefan, Neef, Heinz, Krohe, Katharina, Andreev, Petko, Silber, Rolf-Edgar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title European urology
container_volume 48
creator Hofmann, Hans-Stefan
Neef, Heinz
Krohe, Katharina
Andreev, Petko
Silber, Rolf-Edgar
description Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included. The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection ( R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months). Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030228380500134X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67953067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5GcvCVOstmPXAQpVgXFUvUmLJvNVLY02bqbFPz3bmnBm5eZy_POx0PIZQ5ZDjm_WWU4-MG7rABgGdAMoDwi41wKmgrG4ZiMgUKRFpLKETkLYQUAlFX0lIxyVnFRMDYmn3PvvjoXemuSmTa98yHRXZO8DX5rt3qd6GWPPpkP69Z12v8kCwxoeuu6xC2TF-x16PUuvMAu0lNcx6K9sZ1r9Tk5Wep1wItDn5CP2f379DF9fn14mt49p6YseJ9WKDmy0kgTzzJVTWVRUJmXRmshZRkZ2siqzOuKoRCCQV0BawowkgM0HOmEXO_nbrz7HjD0qrXBxFN0h24IiouKUeAiguUeNN6F4HGpNt628S2Vg9pZVSu1t6p2VhVQFa3G2NVh_lC32PyFDhojcLsHMH65tehVMBY7g4310ZZqnP1_wy8EYYps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><description>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included. The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection ( R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months). Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15967255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - mortality ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Lung metastasis ; Lung Neoplasms - mortality ; Lung Neoplasms - secondary ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrectomy ; Pneumonectomy ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factors ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15967255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krohe, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Petko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included. The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection ( R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months). Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</description><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Lung metastasis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5GcvCVOstmPXAQpVgXFUvUmLJvNVLY02bqbFPz3bmnBm5eZy_POx0PIZQ5ZDjm_WWU4-MG7rABgGdAMoDwi41wKmgrG4ZiMgUKRFpLKETkLYQUAlFX0lIxyVnFRMDYmn3PvvjoXemuSmTa98yHRXZO8DX5rt3qd6GWPPpkP69Z12v8kCwxoeuu6xC2TF-x16PUuvMAu0lNcx6K9sZ1r9Tk5Wep1wItDn5CP2f379DF9fn14mt49p6YseJ9WKDmy0kgTzzJVTWVRUJmXRmshZRkZ2siqzOuKoRCCQV0BawowkgM0HOmEXO_nbrz7HjD0qrXBxFN0h24IiouKUeAiguUeNN6F4HGpNt628S2Vg9pZVSu1t6p2VhVQFa3G2NVh_lC32PyFDhojcLsHMH65tehVMBY7g4310ZZqnP1_wy8EYYps</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creator><creator>Neef, Heinz</creator><creator>Krohe, Katharina</creator><creator>Andreev, Petko</creator><creator>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan ; Neef, Heinz ; Krohe, Katharina ; Andreev, Petko ; Silber, Rolf-Edgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Lung metastasis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krohe, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Petko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hofmann, Hans-Stefan</au><au>Neef, Heinz</au><au>Krohe, Katharina</au><au>Andreev, Petko</au><au>Silber, Rolf-Edgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>77-82</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included. The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection ( R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months). Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15967255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.77-82
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953067
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - mortality
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Lung metastasis
Lung Neoplasms - mortality
Lung Neoplasms - secondary
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Nephrectomy
Pneumonectomy
Prognosis
Prognostic factors
Renal cell carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Survival
Survival Rate
Time Factors
title Prognostic Factors and Survival after Pulmonary Resection of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20Factors%20and%20Survival%20after%20Pulmonary%20Resection%20of%20Metastatic%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Hofmann,%20Hans-Stefan&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=77-82&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67953067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9e86e54c8c596c9b38223814caa78844263d8941b95e77750b905d20c8600d6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953067&rft_id=info:pmid/15967255&rfr_iscdi=true