Loading…

A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches

Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forensic sciences 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508
Main Authors: Bradley, Maureen J., Keagy, Roger L., Lowe, Preston C., Rickenbach, Michael P., Wright, Diana M., LeBeau, Marc A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3
cites
container_end_page 508
container_issue 3
container_start_page 504
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 51
creator Bradley, Maureen J.
Keagy, Roger L.
Lowe, Preston C.
Rickenbach, Michael P.
Wright, Diana M.
LeBeau, Marc A.
description Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67970123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwyAAhonRuDn9C6bx4MlWPlooiZdl7sNluoNTj4QCja1dO0sbt38vc8tMPEkIkPC8b-ABwEMwQG7c5gGKIuqHEPMAQ0gDCJFb10ege7g4Bl0IMfYR4nEHnFmbQ0ciik5BB1HK3WRdcNP3XmWRadlkVek9N63eeGlVe_etaryFXBlvWGrvUTbq3dhzcJLKwpqL_d4DL6PhYjDxZ_Pxw6A_81VIEPUTokNDaZqkUkYI8phIJUNGkihUGick0YliOoU8ZSmjDBItNTMKcskjSEJFeuB617uqq8_W2EYsM6tMUcjSVK0VlHEGESYOvPoD5lVbl-5tAiNOY84wdVC8g1RdWVubVKzqbCnrjUBQbHWKXGytia01sdUpfnSKtYte7vvbZGn0b3DvzwF3O-ArK8zm38ViOpq7g4v7u3hmG7M-xGX94f5IWCTensaCxphMJzwSiHwDGuyPnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219689726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><description>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16696697</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; duct tape ; end match ; error rate ; Evidence ; forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; fracture match ; Fractures ; physical match ; trace evidence ; validation study</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16696697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keagy, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Preston C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>duct tape</subject><subject>end match</subject><subject>error rate</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>fracture match</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>physical match</subject><subject>trace evidence</subject><subject>validation study</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwyAAhonRuDn9C6bx4MlWPlooiZdl7sNluoNTj4QCja1dO0sbt38vc8tMPEkIkPC8b-ABwEMwQG7c5gGKIuqHEPMAQ0gDCJFb10ege7g4Bl0IMfYR4nEHnFmbQ0ciik5BB1HK3WRdcNP3XmWRadlkVek9N63eeGlVe_etaryFXBlvWGrvUTbq3dhzcJLKwpqL_d4DL6PhYjDxZ_Pxw6A_81VIEPUTokNDaZqkUkYI8phIJUNGkihUGick0YliOoU8ZSmjDBItNTMKcskjSEJFeuB617uqq8_W2EYsM6tMUcjSVK0VlHEGESYOvPoD5lVbl-5tAiNOY84wdVC8g1RdWVubVKzqbCnrjUBQbHWKXGytia01sdUpfnSKtYte7vvbZGn0b3DvzwF3O-ArK8zm38ViOpq7g4v7u3hmG7M-xGX94f5IWCTensaCxphMJzwSiHwDGuyPnA</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Bradley, Maureen J.</creator><creator>Keagy, Roger L.</creator><creator>Lowe, Preston C.</creator><creator>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creator><creator>Wright, Diana M.</creator><creator>LeBeau, Marc A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><author>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>duct tape</topic><topic>end match</topic><topic>error rate</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>fracture match</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>physical match</topic><topic>trace evidence</topic><topic>validation study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keagy, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Preston C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Maureen J.</au><au>Keagy, Roger L.</au><au>Lowe, Preston C.</au><au>Rickenbach, Michael P.</au><au>Wright, Diana M.</au><au>LeBeau, Marc A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>504-508</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>16696697</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970123
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adhesives
duct tape
end match
error rate
Evidence
forensic science
Forensic sciences
fracture match
Fractures
physical match
trace evidence
validation study
title A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Validation%20Study%20for%20Duct%20Tape%20End%20Matches&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Bradley,%20Maureen%20J.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=504-508&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67970123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219689726&rft_id=info:pmid/16696697&rfr_iscdi=true