Loading…
A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches
Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of forensic sciences 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 508 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 504 |
container_title | Journal of forensic sciences |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Bradley, Maureen J. Keagy, Roger L. Lowe, Preston C. Rickenbach, Michael P. Wright, Diana M. LeBeau, Marc A. |
description | Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67970123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwyAAhonRuDn9C6bx4MlWPlooiZdl7sNluoNTj4QCja1dO0sbt38vc8tMPEkIkPC8b-ABwEMwQG7c5gGKIuqHEPMAQ0gDCJFb10ege7g4Bl0IMfYR4nEHnFmbQ0ciik5BB1HK3WRdcNP3XmWRadlkVek9N63eeGlVe_etaryFXBlvWGrvUTbq3dhzcJLKwpqL_d4DL6PhYjDxZ_Pxw6A_81VIEPUTokNDaZqkUkYI8phIJUNGkihUGick0YliOoU8ZSmjDBItNTMKcskjSEJFeuB617uqq8_W2EYsM6tMUcjSVK0VlHEGESYOvPoD5lVbl-5tAiNOY84wdVC8g1RdWVubVKzqbCnrjUBQbHWKXGytia01sdUpfnSKtYte7vvbZGn0b3DvzwF3O-ArK8zm38ViOpq7g4v7u3hmG7M-xGX94f5IWCTensaCxphMJzwSiHwDGuyPnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219689726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><description>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16696697</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; duct tape ; end match ; error rate ; Evidence ; forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; fracture match ; Fractures ; physical match ; trace evidence ; validation study</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16696697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keagy, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Preston C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>duct tape</subject><subject>end match</subject><subject>error rate</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>fracture match</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>physical match</subject><subject>trace evidence</subject><subject>validation study</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwyAAhonRuDn9C6bx4MlWPlooiZdl7sNluoNTj4QCja1dO0sbt38vc8tMPEkIkPC8b-ABwEMwQG7c5gGKIuqHEPMAQ0gDCJFb10ege7g4Bl0IMfYR4nEHnFmbQ0ciik5BB1HK3WRdcNP3XmWRadlkVek9N63eeGlVe_etaryFXBlvWGrvUTbq3dhzcJLKwpqL_d4DL6PhYjDxZ_Pxw6A_81VIEPUTokNDaZqkUkYI8phIJUNGkihUGick0YliOoU8ZSmjDBItNTMKcskjSEJFeuB617uqq8_W2EYsM6tMUcjSVK0VlHEGESYOvPoD5lVbl-5tAiNOY84wdVC8g1RdWVubVKzqbCnrjUBQbHWKXGytia01sdUpfnSKtYte7vvbZGn0b3DvzwF3O-ArK8zm38ViOpq7g4v7u3hmG7M-xGX94f5IWCTensaCxphMJzwSiHwDGuyPnA</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Bradley, Maureen J.</creator><creator>Keagy, Roger L.</creator><creator>Lowe, Preston C.</creator><creator>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creator><creator>Wright, Diana M.</creator><creator>LeBeau, Marc A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</title><author>Bradley, Maureen J. ; Keagy, Roger L. ; Lowe, Preston C. ; Rickenbach, Michael P. ; Wright, Diana M. ; LeBeau, Marc A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>duct tape</topic><topic>end match</topic><topic>error rate</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>fracture match</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>physical match</topic><topic>trace evidence</topic><topic>validation study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Maureen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keagy, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Preston C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBeau, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Maureen J.</au><au>Keagy, Roger L.</au><au>Lowe, Preston C.</au><au>Rickenbach, Michael P.</au><au>Wright, Diana M.</au><au>LeBeau, Marc A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>504-508</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>16696697</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1198 |
ispartof | Journal of forensic sciences, 2006-05, Vol.51 (3), p.504-508 |
issn | 0022-1198 1556-4029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970123 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adhesives duct tape end match error rate Evidence forensic science Forensic sciences fracture match Fractures physical match trace evidence validation study |
title | A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Validation%20Study%20for%20Duct%20Tape%20End%20Matches&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Bradley,%20Maureen%20J.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=504-508&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67970123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-b3d4e66fbfaa510983aca473b54cd2b3bdbc7df09f7f76703dad7ec09a95034c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219689726&rft_id=info:pmid/16696697&rfr_iscdi=true |