Is death row obsolete? A decade of mainstreaming death-sentenced inmates in Missouri

Death‐sentenced inmates in Missouri have been integrated or “mainstreamed” into the general population of the Potosi Correctional Center since 1991. By comparing the rate of violent misconduct among these mainstreamed death‐sentenced inmates with that of the life‐without‐parole and parole eligible i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral sciences & the law 2005-01, Vol.23 (3), p.307-320
Main Authors: Cunningham, Mark D., Reidy, Thomas J., Sorensen, Jon R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Capital Punishment
Correction (penology)
Criminal sentences
Death row
Humans
Integration
Legal status, laws, etc
Mental health
Missouri
Prisoners
Prisoners - psychology
Prisons
Safety
Social Isolation
United States
USA
Violence
Violence - trends
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Death‐sentenced inmates in Missouri have been integrated or “mainstreamed” into the general population of the Potosi Correctional Center since 1991. By comparing the rate of violent misconduct among these mainstreamed death‐sentenced inmates with that of the life‐without‐parole and parole eligible inmates under fully integrated conditions of confinement, this study provides the first empirical (statistical) evaluation of this innovative alternative to segregated death row confinement. The mainstreamed death‐sentenced inmates committed no inmate or staff homicides, or attempted homicides. Comparison of their rates of institutional violence revealed frequencies that were similar to those of life‐without‐parole inmates, and well below those of fellow inmates who were sentenced to parole eligible terms. These findings cast serious doubt on the security‐driven assumptions that have typified the segregation of death‐sentenced inmates and have dictated highly restrictive confinement policies for this group. A conclusion that death‐sentenced inmates can be safely integrated into a general prison population has significant implications for allocation of scarce fiscal resources and correctional staff, as well as for inmate mental health, particularly given the extended tenure that death‐sentenced inmates typically serve between sentencing and relief/execution. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0735-3936
1099-0798
DOI:10.1002/bsl.608