Loading…
Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk
Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subje...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological medicine 2006-06, Vol.36 (6), p.771-778 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-9a29c040a1e56c27cb56d6ccc01e581be8f98af2c15575d5e5c5fbd3ba4ff1363 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 778 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 771 |
container_title | Psychological medicine |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | JANSSEN, I. VERSMISSEN, D. CAMPO, J. À. MYIN-GERMEYS, I. OS, J. VAN KRABBENDAM, L. |
description | Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences, and (iii) this attribution style is related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. Method. Participants were 23 patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis, a high- risk group of 36 first-degree relatives of patients with non-affective psychosis, a high-risk group of 31 subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences and 46 normal controls. Attribution style was measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire. Positive symptoms were assessed with the Present State Examination (PSE) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Results. Relative to the controls, an externalizing bias was apparent in the patient group (β=0·20, p=0·03) but not in the two high-risk groups. There was a dose–response association between externalizing bias and the delusions subscale of the PSE (relative to lowest level: highest level of delusions: β=0·53, p=0·04; intermediate levels of delusions: β=0·23, p=0·35). No significant differences were found in personalizing bias between the four groups. Conclusions. Patients with psychosis tend to use an externalizing bias in their explanations of negative social events, and this bias is associated with the presence of positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. A deviant attribution style is not part of the vulnerability to psychosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0033291706007422 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291706007422</cupid><sourcerecordid>20731848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-9a29c040a1e56c27cb56d6ccc01e581be8f98af2c15575d5e5c5fbd3ba4ff1363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8kCPZtNP8z8a0UW4VSKa3PQyaT2U07m1lzM9L105txFxcU6dOFe373cM-9CL2m5D0lVH-4IYRzZqgmihAtGHuCFlQoU9VG10_RYparWT9CLwDuCKGcCvYcHVElFWdELRCc5pxCO-UwRgx5O3hsY4c3sHWrEQJ8xP5H6Hx0HvdjKhr2D9mnaIfwM8QlboMFHCLe2Bx8zICLFY5jnnshdqEMT3YAbDNeheUKpwD3L9GzvvT8q309Rt_OP92efa4uv158OTu9rJwkJFfGMuOIIJZ6qRzTrpWqU845Uho1bX3dm9r2zFEpteykl072bcdbK_qecsWP0cnOd5PG75OH3KwDOD8MNvpxgkZpo7Uh5lFQalprLtijICOa01rUBXz7F3g3TvPVZkYIw2tNC0R3kEsjQPJ9s0lhbdO2oaSZH9z88-Ay82ZvPLVr3x0m9h8twLs9YMHZoU82ugAHriQW8neUascFyP7hj27TfbkL17JRF9fNrRDXV4pfNTeF5_tl7bpNoVv6Q6T_r_sLK0XMLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204493871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>JANSSEN, I. ; VERSMISSEN, D. ; CAMPO, J. À. ; MYIN-GERMEYS, I. ; OS, J. VAN ; KRABBENDAM, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>JANSSEN, I. ; VERSMISSEN, D. ; CAMPO, J. À. ; MYIN-GERMEYS, I. ; OS, J. VAN ; KRABBENDAM, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences, and (iii) this attribution style is related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. Method. Participants were 23 patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis, a high- risk group of 36 first-degree relatives of patients with non-affective psychosis, a high-risk group of 31 subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences and 46 normal controls. Attribution style was measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire. Positive symptoms were assessed with the Present State Examination (PSE) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Results. Relative to the controls, an externalizing bias was apparent in the patient group (β=0·20, p=0·03) but not in the two high-risk groups. There was a dose–response association between externalizing bias and the delusions subscale of the PSE (relative to lowest level: highest level of delusions: β=0·53, p=0·04; intermediate levels of delusions: β=0·23, p=0·35). No significant differences were found in personalizing bias between the four groups. Conclusions. Patients with psychosis tend to use an externalizing bias in their explanations of negative social events, and this bias is associated with the presence of positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. A deviant attribution style is not part of the vulnerability to psychosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291706007422</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16563206</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSMDCO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attributional style ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Delusions - diagnosis ; Delusions - epidemiology ; Delusions - psychology ; Externalizing problems ; Female ; Humans ; Life Change Events ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Patients - psychology ; Patients - statistics & numerical data ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Schizophrenia ; Social Behavior ; Social Perception ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2006-06, Vol.36 (6), p.771-778</ispartof><rights>2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-9a29c040a1e56c27cb56d6ccc01e581be8f98af2c15575d5e5c5fbd3ba4ff1363</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/204493871/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/204493871?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12833,21381,21382,27911,27912,30986,30987,33598,33599,34517,34518,43720,44102,72715,73976,74394</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17794542$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16563206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JANSSEN, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERSMISSEN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPO, J. À.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYIN-GERMEYS, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OS, J. VAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRABBENDAM, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences, and (iii) this attribution style is related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. Method. Participants were 23 patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis, a high- risk group of 36 first-degree relatives of patients with non-affective psychosis, a high-risk group of 31 subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences and 46 normal controls. Attribution style was measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire. Positive symptoms were assessed with the Present State Examination (PSE) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Results. Relative to the controls, an externalizing bias was apparent in the patient group (β=0·20, p=0·03) but not in the two high-risk groups. There was a dose–response association between externalizing bias and the delusions subscale of the PSE (relative to lowest level: highest level of delusions: β=0·53, p=0·04; intermediate levels of delusions: β=0·23, p=0·35). No significant differences were found in personalizing bias between the four groups. Conclusions. Patients with psychosis tend to use an externalizing bias in their explanations of negative social events, and this bias is associated with the presence of positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. A deviant attribution style is not part of the vulnerability to psychosis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attributional style</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Delusions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Delusions - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delusions - psychology</subject><subject>Externalizing problems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Patients - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8kCPZtNP8z8a0UW4VSKa3PQyaT2U07m1lzM9L105txFxcU6dOFe373cM-9CL2m5D0lVH-4IYRzZqgmihAtGHuCFlQoU9VG10_RYparWT9CLwDuCKGcCvYcHVElFWdELRCc5pxCO-UwRgx5O3hsY4c3sHWrEQJ8xP5H6Hx0HvdjKhr2D9mnaIfwM8QlboMFHCLe2Bx8zICLFY5jnnshdqEMT3YAbDNeheUKpwD3L9GzvvT8q309Rt_OP92efa4uv158OTu9rJwkJFfGMuOIIJZ6qRzTrpWqU845Uho1bX3dm9r2zFEpteykl072bcdbK_qecsWP0cnOd5PG75OH3KwDOD8MNvpxgkZpo7Uh5lFQalprLtijICOa01rUBXz7F3g3TvPVZkYIw2tNC0R3kEsjQPJ9s0lhbdO2oaSZH9z88-Ay82ZvPLVr3x0m9h8twLs9YMHZoU82ugAHriQW8neUascFyP7hj27TfbkL17JRF9fNrRDXV4pfNTeF5_tl7bpNoVv6Q6T_r_sLK0XMLA</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>JANSSEN, I.</creator><creator>VERSMISSEN, D.</creator><creator>CAMPO, J. À.</creator><creator>MYIN-GERMEYS, I.</creator><creator>OS, J. VAN</creator><creator>KRABBENDAM, L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk</title><author>JANSSEN, I. ; VERSMISSEN, D. ; CAMPO, J. À. ; MYIN-GERMEYS, I. ; OS, J. VAN ; KRABBENDAM, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-9a29c040a1e56c27cb56d6ccc01e581be8f98af2c15575d5e5c5fbd3ba4ff1363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attributional style</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Delusions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Delusions - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delusions - psychology</topic><topic>Externalizing problems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Patients - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JANSSEN, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERSMISSEN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPO, J. À.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYIN-GERMEYS, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OS, J. VAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRABBENDAM, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JANSSEN, I.</au><au>VERSMISSEN, D.</au><au>CAMPO, J. À.</au><au>MYIN-GERMEYS, I.</au><au>OS, J. VAN</au><au>KRABBENDAM, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>771-778</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><coden>PSMDCO</coden><abstract>Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences, and (iii) this attribution style is related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. Method. Participants were 23 patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis, a high- risk group of 36 first-degree relatives of patients with non-affective psychosis, a high-risk group of 31 subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences and 46 normal controls. Attribution style was measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire. Positive symptoms were assessed with the Present State Examination (PSE) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Results. Relative to the controls, an externalizing bias was apparent in the patient group (β=0·20, p=0·03) but not in the two high-risk groups. There was a dose–response association between externalizing bias and the delusions subscale of the PSE (relative to lowest level: highest level of delusions: β=0·53, p=0·04; intermediate levels of delusions: β=0·23, p=0·35). No significant differences were found in personalizing bias between the four groups. Conclusions. Patients with psychosis tend to use an externalizing bias in their explanations of negative social events, and this bias is associated with the presence of positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. A deviant attribution style is not part of the vulnerability to psychosis.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16563206</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291706007422</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2917 |
ispartof | Psychological medicine, 2006-06, Vol.36 (6), p.771-778 |
issn | 0033-2917 1469-8978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977909 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attributional style Bias Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Delusions - diagnosis Delusions - epidemiology Delusions - psychology Externalizing problems Female Humans Life Change Events Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Original Article Patients - psychology Patients - statistics & numerical data Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Psychosis Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology Psychotic Disorders - psychology Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Schizophrenia Social Behavior Social Perception Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attribution%20style%20and%20psychosis:%20evidence%20for%20an%20externalizing%20bias%20in%20patients%20but%20not%20in%20individuals%20at%20high%20risk&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=JANSSEN,%20I.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=771-778&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft.coden=PSMDCO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291706007422&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20731848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-9a29c040a1e56c27cb56d6ccc01e581be8f98af2c15575d5e5c5fbd3ba4ff1363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204493871&rft_id=info:pmid/16563206&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291706007422&rfr_iscdi=true |