Experience with a step-down respiratory care center at a tertiary referral medical center in Taiwan

• Published in: Journal of critical care 2006-06, Vol.21 (2), p.156-161
• Main Authors: Su, Jian, Lin, Chang-Yi, Chen, Pei-Jan, Lin, Fung J., Chen, Shiow-Kwan, Kuo, Hsu-Tah
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; APACHE; Cancer; Disease; Female; Heart attacks; Humans; Intensive care; Male; Middle Aged; Patients; Prolonged mechanical ventilation; Referral and Consultation; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory care center; Respiratory Center; Respiratory Therapy; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Tuberculosis; Ventilators; Weaning
• ISSN: 0883-9441; 1557-8615
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.10.004

The aim of the study was to describe the outcome of patients after 1 year's implementation of an integrated delivery system for respiratory care mandated by the National Health Insurance Bureau in Taiwan. A retrospective observational study was conducted in a step-down respiratory care center (RCC). Patients included adults receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥21 days). A total of 224 cases were available for review; 108 (48.2%) patients were successfully weaned. Those who failed weaning had a longer stay in the intensive care unit and RCC (25.1 vs 20.9 and 31.4 vs 18.6 days, P < .05), but there were no differences in the patients' ages (74.3 vs 70.4 years, P = .17) or the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (52 vs 46.9, P = .18) before admission to the RCC. After discharge from the RCC, only 4.9% of the patients still on a ventilator were weaned within 1 year. Patients who failed weaning in the RCC had a shorter overall survival (5.2 vs 10.4 months, P < .05) and a lower 1-year survival (23.6% vs 44.6%, P < .05). Patients admitted to the RCC were still critically ill. Patients who failed weaning in the RCC had had a longer intensive care unit and RCC stay and a worse outcome after leaving the RCC.