Loading…

Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands

Most subsurface flow treatment wetlands, also known as reed bed or root zone systems, use sand or gravel substrates to reduce organics, solids, and nutrients in septic tank effluents. Phosphorus (P) retention in these systems is highly variable and few studies have identified the fate of retained P....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2005-06, Vol.39 (12), p.4621-4627
Main Authors: Forbes, Margaret G, Dickson, Kenneth L, Saleh, Farida, Waller, William T, Doyle, Robert D, Hudak, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3
container_end_page 4627
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4621
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 39
creator Forbes, Margaret G
Dickson, Kenneth L
Saleh, Farida
Waller, William T
Doyle, Robert D
Hudak, Paul
description Most subsurface flow treatment wetlands, also known as reed bed or root zone systems, use sand or gravel substrates to reduce organics, solids, and nutrients in septic tank effluents. Phosphorus (P) retention in these systems is highly variable and few studies have identified the fate of retained P. In this study, two substrates, expanded shale and masonry sand, were used as filter media in five subsurface flow pilot-scale wetlands (2.7 m3). After 1 year of operation, we estimated the annual rate of P sorption by taking the difference between total P (TP) of substrate in the pilot cells and TP of substrate not exposed to wastewater (control). Means and standard deviations of TP retained by expanded shale were 349 ± 171 mg kg-1, respectively. For a substrate depth of 0.9 m, aerial P retention by shale was 201 ± 98.6 g of P m-2 year-1, respectively. Masonry sand retained an insignificant quantity of wastewater P (11.9 ± 21.8 mg kg-1) and on occasion exported P. Substrate samples were also sequentially fractionated into labile P, microbial P, (Fe + Al) P, humic P, (Ca + Mg) P, and residual P. In expanded shale samples, the greatest increase in P was in the relatively permanent form of (Fe + Al) P (108 mg kg-1), followed by labile P (46.7 mg kg-1) and humic P (39.8 mg kg-1). In masonry sand, there was an increase in labile P (9.71 mg kg-1). Results suggest that sand is a poor candidate for long-term P storage, but its efficiency is similar to that reported for many sand, gravel, and rock systems. By contrast, expanded shale and similar products with high hydraulic conductivity and P sorption capacity could greatly improve performance of P retention in constructed wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es048149o
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68082064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16198722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v00AQhi0EomnhwB9AewGJg2E_vB8-QtUUqlSEOi29rcb2mLg43rBr0-Z_8IPZkKjlgMRlRjPzzKvZfZPkBaNvGeXsHQaaGZbl7lEyYZLTVBrJHicTSplIc6GuD5LDEG4opVxQ8zQ5YIpm2lA2SX5dYOV-ot8Q6Gsy9VANrethG4hryHzpwnrp_BjIBQ7Q9liTckNm7bflcIvbSE7u1nE19osldPhH5hyC66NksS0uQ5xBIOdYt0DanhRjGUbfQIVk2rlbsvAIwwr7gXzFoYsr4VnypIEu4PN9PkoupyeL44_p7PPpp-P3sxQyxoe0NEwbKUopJNcKJDV1rSVvSqh0RhkIKRTjKpe6xIzXTFc6VyC0wEwqo0pxlLze6a69-zFiGOyqDRV28Qh0Y7DKUMOpyv4LMsVyozmP4JsdWHkXgsfGrn27Ar-xjNqtV_beq8i-3IuO5QrrB3JvTgRe7QEIFXSNh75qw1-cMTS-I3LpjmvDgHf3c_DfrdJCS7uYF_b6y_xDcXZ1Zq8edKEK9saNvo-f_I8DfwMJuLel</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16198722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Forbes, Margaret G ; Dickson, Kenneth L ; Saleh, Farida ; Waller, William T ; Doyle, Robert D ; Hudak, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G ; Dickson, Kenneth L ; Saleh, Farida ; Waller, William T ; Doyle, Robert D ; Hudak, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Most subsurface flow treatment wetlands, also known as reed bed or root zone systems, use sand or gravel substrates to reduce organics, solids, and nutrients in septic tank effluents. Phosphorus (P) retention in these systems is highly variable and few studies have identified the fate of retained P. In this study, two substrates, expanded shale and masonry sand, were used as filter media in five subsurface flow pilot-scale wetlands (2.7 m3). After 1 year of operation, we estimated the annual rate of P sorption by taking the difference between total P (TP) of substrate in the pilot cells and TP of substrate not exposed to wastewater (control). Means and standard deviations of TP retained by expanded shale were 349 ± 171 mg kg-1, respectively. For a substrate depth of 0.9 m, aerial P retention by shale was 201 ± 98.6 g of P m-2 year-1, respectively. Masonry sand retained an insignificant quantity of wastewater P (11.9 ± 21.8 mg kg-1) and on occasion exported P. Substrate samples were also sequentially fractionated into labile P, microbial P, (Fe + Al) P, humic P, (Ca + Mg) P, and residual P. In expanded shale samples, the greatest increase in P was in the relatively permanent form of (Fe + Al) P (108 mg kg-1), followed by labile P (46.7 mg kg-1) and humic P (39.8 mg kg-1). In masonry sand, there was an increase in labile P (9.71 mg kg-1). Results suggest that sand is a poor candidate for long-term P storage, but its efficiency is similar to that reported for many sand, gravel, and rock systems. By contrast, expanded shale and similar products with high hydraulic conductivity and P sorption capacity could greatly improve performance of P retention in constructed wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es048149o</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16047801</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; Chemical Fractionation ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Other wastewaters ; Phosphorus - chemistry ; Phosphorus - isolation &amp; purification ; Pollution ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewaters ; Water Movements ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2005-06, Vol.39 (12), p.4621-4627</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16880686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16047801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, William T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudak, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Most subsurface flow treatment wetlands, also known as reed bed or root zone systems, use sand or gravel substrates to reduce organics, solids, and nutrients in septic tank effluents. Phosphorus (P) retention in these systems is highly variable and few studies have identified the fate of retained P. In this study, two substrates, expanded shale and masonry sand, were used as filter media in five subsurface flow pilot-scale wetlands (2.7 m3). After 1 year of operation, we estimated the annual rate of P sorption by taking the difference between total P (TP) of substrate in the pilot cells and TP of substrate not exposed to wastewater (control). Means and standard deviations of TP retained by expanded shale were 349 ± 171 mg kg-1, respectively. For a substrate depth of 0.9 m, aerial P retention by shale was 201 ± 98.6 g of P m-2 year-1, respectively. Masonry sand retained an insignificant quantity of wastewater P (11.9 ± 21.8 mg kg-1) and on occasion exported P. Substrate samples were also sequentially fractionated into labile P, microbial P, (Fe + Al) P, humic P, (Ca + Mg) P, and residual P. In expanded shale samples, the greatest increase in P was in the relatively permanent form of (Fe + Al) P (108 mg kg-1), followed by labile P (46.7 mg kg-1) and humic P (39.8 mg kg-1). In masonry sand, there was an increase in labile P (9.71 mg kg-1). Results suggest that sand is a poor candidate for long-term P storage, but its efficiency is similar to that reported for many sand, gravel, and rock systems. By contrast, expanded shale and similar products with high hydraulic conductivity and P sorption capacity could greatly improve performance of P retention in constructed wetlands.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical Fractionation</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Other wastewaters</subject><subject>Phosphorus - chemistry</subject><subject>Phosphorus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v00AQhi0EomnhwB9AewGJg2E_vB8-QtUUqlSEOi29rcb2mLg43rBr0-Z_8IPZkKjlgMRlRjPzzKvZfZPkBaNvGeXsHQaaGZbl7lEyYZLTVBrJHicTSplIc6GuD5LDEG4opVxQ8zQ5YIpm2lA2SX5dYOV-ot8Q6Gsy9VANrethG4hryHzpwnrp_BjIBQ7Q9liTckNm7bflcIvbSE7u1nE19osldPhH5hyC66NksS0uQ5xBIOdYt0DanhRjGUbfQIVk2rlbsvAIwwr7gXzFoYsr4VnypIEu4PN9PkoupyeL44_p7PPpp-P3sxQyxoe0NEwbKUopJNcKJDV1rSVvSqh0RhkIKRTjKpe6xIzXTFc6VyC0wEwqo0pxlLze6a69-zFiGOyqDRV28Qh0Y7DKUMOpyv4LMsVyozmP4JsdWHkXgsfGrn27Ar-xjNqtV_beq8i-3IuO5QrrB3JvTgRe7QEIFXSNh75qw1-cMTS-I3LpjmvDgHf3c_DfrdJCS7uYF_b6y_xDcXZ1Zq8edKEK9saNvo-f_I8DfwMJuLel</recordid><startdate>20050615</startdate><enddate>20050615</enddate><creator>Forbes, Margaret G</creator><creator>Dickson, Kenneth L</creator><creator>Saleh, Farida</creator><creator>Waller, William T</creator><creator>Doyle, Robert D</creator><creator>Hudak, Paul</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050615</creationdate><title>Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands</title><author>Forbes, Margaret G ; Dickson, Kenneth L ; Saleh, Farida ; Waller, William T ; Doyle, Robert D ; Hudak, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical Fractionation</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Other wastewaters</topic><topic>Phosphorus - chemistry</topic><topic>Phosphorus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, William T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudak, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forbes, Margaret G</au><au>Dickson, Kenneth L</au><au>Saleh, Farida</au><au>Waller, William T</au><au>Doyle, Robert D</au><au>Hudak, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2005-06-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4621</spage><epage>4627</epage><pages>4621-4627</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Most subsurface flow treatment wetlands, also known as reed bed or root zone systems, use sand or gravel substrates to reduce organics, solids, and nutrients in septic tank effluents. Phosphorus (P) retention in these systems is highly variable and few studies have identified the fate of retained P. In this study, two substrates, expanded shale and masonry sand, were used as filter media in five subsurface flow pilot-scale wetlands (2.7 m3). After 1 year of operation, we estimated the annual rate of P sorption by taking the difference between total P (TP) of substrate in the pilot cells and TP of substrate not exposed to wastewater (control). Means and standard deviations of TP retained by expanded shale were 349 ± 171 mg kg-1, respectively. For a substrate depth of 0.9 m, aerial P retention by shale was 201 ± 98.6 g of P m-2 year-1, respectively. Masonry sand retained an insignificant quantity of wastewater P (11.9 ± 21.8 mg kg-1) and on occasion exported P. Substrate samples were also sequentially fractionated into labile P, microbial P, (Fe + Al) P, humic P, (Ca + Mg) P, and residual P. In expanded shale samples, the greatest increase in P was in the relatively permanent form of (Fe + Al) P (108 mg kg-1), followed by labile P (46.7 mg kg-1) and humic P (39.8 mg kg-1). In masonry sand, there was an increase in labile P (9.71 mg kg-1). Results suggest that sand is a poor candidate for long-term P storage, but its efficiency is similar to that reported for many sand, gravel, and rock systems. By contrast, expanded shale and similar products with high hydraulic conductivity and P sorption capacity could greatly improve performance of P retention in constructed wetlands.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>16047801</pmid><doi>10.1021/es048149o</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2005-06, Vol.39 (12), p.4621-4627
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68082064
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Adsorption
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Biotechnology
Chemical Fractionation
Environment and pollution
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geologic Sediments - chemistry
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Other wastewaters
Phosphorus - chemistry
Phosphorus - isolation & purification
Pollution
Silicon Dioxide - chemistry
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastewaters
Water Movements
Water Purification - methods
Water treatment and pollution
title Recovery and Fractionation of Phosphorus Retained by Lightweight Expanded Shale and Masonry Sand Used as Media in Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery%20and%20Fractionation%20of%20Phosphorus%20Retained%20by%20Lightweight%20Expanded%20Shale%20and%20Masonry%20Sand%20Used%20as%20Media%20in%20Subsurface%20Flow%20Treatment%20Wetlands&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Forbes,%20Margaret%20G&rft.date=2005-06-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4621&rft.epage=4627&rft.pages=4621-4627&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es048149o&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16198722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-b817853b535276a508dd752fbac7401a3536126957be42d17c796a373e45686b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16198722&rft_id=info:pmid/16047801&rfr_iscdi=true