Loading…

Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics

Genus Nitrospira and Nitrobacter species are the key nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants. It has been hypothesized that genus Nitrospira are K-strategists and can exploit low amounts of nitrite more efficiently than Nitrobacter. In contrast, Nitrobacter species...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2006-03, Vol.40 (5), p.887-894
Main Authors: Kim, Dong-Jin, Kim, Sun-Hee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573
container_end_page 894
container_issue 5
container_start_page 887
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 40
creator Kim, Dong-Jin
Kim, Sun-Hee
description Genus Nitrospira and Nitrobacter species are the key nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants. It has been hypothesized that genus Nitrospira are K-strategists and can exploit low amounts of nitrite more efficiently than Nitrobacter. In contrast, Nitrobacter species are r-strategists that can grow faster than Nitrospira. To elucidate the K/r hypothesis and to analyze the effect of substrate (nitrite) concentration on the competition and distribution of the two NOB, two different reactor types were employed for nitrite oxidation (nitratation) and NOB growth. The continuous biofilm airlift reactor (CBAR) maintained low nitrite concentration due to the complete oxidation of nitrite in continuous operation while the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was kept in a relatively high nitrite concentration environment due to a cyclic substrate concentration profile. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that both Nitrobacter species and genus Nitrospira were present in the CBAR and the SBR. Quantitative FISH analyses of the CBAR showed that Nitrospira occupied 59% of the total bacteria while Nitrobacter occupied only 5%. On the other hand, Nitrobacter, occupying 64%, was the dominant NOB in the SBR, and only 3% of total bacteria belonged to genus Nitrospira. Nitrite oxidation kinetics and quantitative FISH analyses revealed that the specific nitrite oxidation activities of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira are 93.8 and 10.5 mg/g NOB h, respectively, and the specific activity of Nitrobacter is about 9 times higher than that of Nitrospira. In conclusion, the results confirm the K/r hypothesis and the distribution of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira is likely to depend mainly on nitrite concentration. It seems that nitrite load and starvation conditions do not give a direct effect on the distribution of NOB.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135405007104</els_id><sourcerecordid>68089129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhS0EokPhDRBkA7sM145_4g1SVZUfqRIL6NpynOvWwyQebA9QHocnxZ2M6A4kS5Z9v3OudY8JeU5hTYHKN5v1D1sS5jUDEGvK1sC6B2RFe6Vbxnn_kKwAeNfSTvAT8iTnDQAw1unH5IRKLkH1dEV-X3iPrjTRN3MoKRRsXJwdziXZEuLc1FVusBlDrtVhf7iz81ipaYclLMxfcRt_hjH8CvN1M1hXMAXbhPlQtWUxTFgLMTX5Nhec8sGsdgip-Rrm6ugad2PTIs71mJ-SR95uMz477qfk6t3Fl_MP7eWn9x_Pzy5bx7ko7TCgkL2lelCj4god9qA4UlQK9Nh7K60eBicFVUJx551TonO9HFBb5YXqTsnrxXeX4rc95mKmkB1ut3bGuM9G9tBryvR_Qaq1BK67CvIFdCnmnNCbXQqTTbeGgrkL0WzMEqK5C9FQZmqIVfbi6L8fJhzvRcfUKvDqCNjs7NYnO7uQ7zklhNSMV-7lwnkbjb2u8zRXnxnQDij0AB2rxNuFwDrY7wGTyS5gzX8MqX4LM8bw77f-AX3xy0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19960493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Dong-Jin ; Kim, Sun-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Jin ; Kim, Sun-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>Genus Nitrospira and Nitrobacter species are the key nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants. It has been hypothesized that genus Nitrospira are K-strategists and can exploit low amounts of nitrite more efficiently than Nitrobacter. In contrast, Nitrobacter species are r-strategists that can grow faster than Nitrospira. To elucidate the K/r hypothesis and to analyze the effect of substrate (nitrite) concentration on the competition and distribution of the two NOB, two different reactor types were employed for nitrite oxidation (nitratation) and NOB growth. The continuous biofilm airlift reactor (CBAR) maintained low nitrite concentration due to the complete oxidation of nitrite in continuous operation while the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was kept in a relatively high nitrite concentration environment due to a cyclic substrate concentration profile. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that both Nitrobacter species and genus Nitrospira were present in the CBAR and the SBR. Quantitative FISH analyses of the CBAR showed that Nitrospira occupied 59% of the total bacteria while Nitrobacter occupied only 5%. On the other hand, Nitrobacter, occupying 64%, was the dominant NOB in the SBR, and only 3% of total bacteria belonged to genus Nitrospira. Nitrite oxidation kinetics and quantitative FISH analyses revealed that the specific nitrite oxidation activities of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira are 93.8 and 10.5 mg/g NOB h, respectively, and the specific activity of Nitrobacter is about 9 times higher than that of Nitrospira. In conclusion, the results confirm the K/r hypothesis and the distribution of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira is likely to depend mainly on nitrite concentration. It seems that nitrite load and starvation conditions do not give a direct effect on the distribution of NOB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16460781</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; bacteria ; Bacteria - cytology ; Bacteria - metabolism ; batch systems ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; chemical concentration ; continuous biofilm airlift reactor ; continuous systems ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; K/r hypothesis ; Kinetics ; nitration ; Nitrification ; Nitrite oxidation ; nitrite-oxidizing bacteria ; Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) ; nitrites ; Nitrites - analysis ; Nitrites - metabolism ; Nitrobacter ; Nitrospira ; oxidation ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Pollution ; pollution control ; pollution load ; sequencing batch reactor ; species differences ; Time Factors ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2006-03, Vol.40 (5), p.887-894</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17556924$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16460781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sun-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Genus Nitrospira and Nitrobacter species are the key nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants. It has been hypothesized that genus Nitrospira are K-strategists and can exploit low amounts of nitrite more efficiently than Nitrobacter. In contrast, Nitrobacter species are r-strategists that can grow faster than Nitrospira. To elucidate the K/r hypothesis and to analyze the effect of substrate (nitrite) concentration on the competition and distribution of the two NOB, two different reactor types were employed for nitrite oxidation (nitratation) and NOB growth. The continuous biofilm airlift reactor (CBAR) maintained low nitrite concentration due to the complete oxidation of nitrite in continuous operation while the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was kept in a relatively high nitrite concentration environment due to a cyclic substrate concentration profile. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that both Nitrobacter species and genus Nitrospira were present in the CBAR and the SBR. Quantitative FISH analyses of the CBAR showed that Nitrospira occupied 59% of the total bacteria while Nitrobacter occupied only 5%. On the other hand, Nitrobacter, occupying 64%, was the dominant NOB in the SBR, and only 3% of total bacteria belonged to genus Nitrospira. Nitrite oxidation kinetics and quantitative FISH analyses revealed that the specific nitrite oxidation activities of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira are 93.8 and 10.5 mg/g NOB h, respectively, and the specific activity of Nitrobacter is about 9 times higher than that of Nitrospira. In conclusion, the results confirm the K/r hypothesis and the distribution of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira is likely to depend mainly on nitrite concentration. It seems that nitrite load and starvation conditions do not give a direct effect on the distribution of NOB.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - cytology</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>batch systems</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>chemical concentration</subject><subject>continuous biofilm airlift reactor</subject><subject>continuous systems</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>K/r hypothesis</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>nitration</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Nitrite oxidation</subject><subject>nitrite-oxidizing bacteria</subject><subject>Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB)</subject><subject>nitrites</subject><subject>Nitrites - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrites - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrobacter</subject><subject>Nitrospira</subject><subject>oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>sequencing batch reactor</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhS0EokPhDRBkA7sM145_4g1SVZUfqRIL6NpynOvWwyQebA9QHocnxZ2M6A4kS5Z9v3OudY8JeU5hTYHKN5v1D1sS5jUDEGvK1sC6B2RFe6Vbxnn_kKwAeNfSTvAT8iTnDQAw1unH5IRKLkH1dEV-X3iPrjTRN3MoKRRsXJwdziXZEuLc1FVusBlDrtVhf7iz81ipaYclLMxfcRt_hjH8CvN1M1hXMAXbhPlQtWUxTFgLMTX5Nhec8sGsdgip-Rrm6ugad2PTIs71mJ-SR95uMz477qfk6t3Fl_MP7eWn9x_Pzy5bx7ko7TCgkL2lelCj4god9qA4UlQK9Nh7K60eBicFVUJx551TonO9HFBb5YXqTsnrxXeX4rc95mKmkB1ut3bGuM9G9tBryvR_Qaq1BK67CvIFdCnmnNCbXQqTTbeGgrkL0WzMEqK5C9FQZmqIVfbi6L8fJhzvRcfUKvDqCNjs7NYnO7uQ7zklhNSMV-7lwnkbjb2u8zRXnxnQDij0AB2rxNuFwDrY7wGTyS5gzX8MqX4LM8bw77f-AX3xy0k</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Kim, Dong-Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Sun-Hee</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics</title><author>Kim, Dong-Jin ; Kim, Sun-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - cytology</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>batch systems</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>chemical concentration</topic><topic>continuous biofilm airlift reactor</topic><topic>continuous systems</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>K/r hypothesis</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>nitration</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Nitrite oxidation</topic><topic>nitrite-oxidizing bacteria</topic><topic>Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB)</topic><topic>nitrites</topic><topic>Nitrites - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrites - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrobacter</topic><topic>Nitrospira</topic><topic>oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>sequencing batch reactor</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sun-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dong-Jin</au><au>Kim, Sun-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>887-894</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Genus Nitrospira and Nitrobacter species are the key nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants. It has been hypothesized that genus Nitrospira are K-strategists and can exploit low amounts of nitrite more efficiently than Nitrobacter. In contrast, Nitrobacter species are r-strategists that can grow faster than Nitrospira. To elucidate the K/r hypothesis and to analyze the effect of substrate (nitrite) concentration on the competition and distribution of the two NOB, two different reactor types were employed for nitrite oxidation (nitratation) and NOB growth. The continuous biofilm airlift reactor (CBAR) maintained low nitrite concentration due to the complete oxidation of nitrite in continuous operation while the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was kept in a relatively high nitrite concentration environment due to a cyclic substrate concentration profile. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that both Nitrobacter species and genus Nitrospira were present in the CBAR and the SBR. Quantitative FISH analyses of the CBAR showed that Nitrospira occupied 59% of the total bacteria while Nitrobacter occupied only 5%. On the other hand, Nitrobacter, occupying 64%, was the dominant NOB in the SBR, and only 3% of total bacteria belonged to genus Nitrospira. Nitrite oxidation kinetics and quantitative FISH analyses revealed that the specific nitrite oxidation activities of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira are 93.8 and 10.5 mg/g NOB h, respectively, and the specific activity of Nitrobacter is about 9 times higher than that of Nitrospira. In conclusion, the results confirm the K/r hypothesis and the distribution of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira is likely to depend mainly on nitrite concentration. It seems that nitrite load and starvation conditions do not give a direct effect on the distribution of NOB.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16460781</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2006-03, Vol.40 (5), p.887-894
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089129
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
bacteria
Bacteria - cytology
Bacteria - metabolism
batch systems
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
chemical concentration
continuous biofilm airlift reactor
continuous systems
Environment and pollution
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General purification processes
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
K/r hypothesis
Kinetics
nitration
Nitrification
Nitrite oxidation
nitrite-oxidizing bacteria
Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB)
nitrites
Nitrites - analysis
Nitrites - metabolism
Nitrobacter
Nitrospira
oxidation
Oxidation-Reduction
Pollution
pollution control
pollution load
sequencing batch reactor
species differences
Time Factors
Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
water pollution
Water treatment and pollution
title Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A17%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20nitrite%20concentration%20on%20the%20distribution%20and%20competition%20of%20nitrite-oxidizing%20bacteria%20in%20nitratation%20reactor%20systems%20and%20their%20kinetic%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kim,%20Dong-Jin&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=887-894&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68089129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bbe568a19b7d747ece8074e1e7709d8fa6a9bbc6517574cfcc753c86be9a7f573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19960493&rft_id=info:pmid/16460781&rfr_iscdi=true