Loading…
Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials
To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical neurophysiology 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243 |
container_end_page | 1869 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1858 |
container_title | Clinical neurophysiology |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | MacDonald, D.B. Al Zayed, Z. Stigsby, B. |
description | To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials.
Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and standard P37>P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity.
Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable.
CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245705001793</els_id><sourcerecordid>68089349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBgh5A6sm-C9_LJBQRQtSJRAqa8txxsWXxA4e3ytdno2Hw9GNVFasZuw539HYpyheMloxypq3u8pMzi8_Kk5pXVFZUdY9Ks5Z1_Ky62v-OPei60ou6_aseIa4o5S2VPKnxRlrMsMbdl78uXOD0xPBMOsUEDyGeCRwCD9hJEtI4NM6dj5FHRaIOrkDkDl4l0J0_v4d-QYmzDP4MY-CRzJozGjwBN29z2gKxAeHQFY2EJ3vjuiQBJv9l8klyCIbEPUlCUtys_ud-a-ivSSYdLaN2yn3uWEPW-Hz4onNBV5s9aL4fv3x7upTefvl5vPVh9vSyLpJpRC8b21ja2oFBRhYR7tBiL7hNWN6HHjd9MxKY7TomdDSDJxbIxsqhbEjl-KieHPyXWL4tQdManZoYJq0h7BH1WTDXsg-C-VJaGJ-UASrluhmHY-KUbWmpnbqlJpaU1NUqpxaxl5t_vthhvEB2mLKgtebQKPRk43aG4f_6Pq-buVq9P6kg_wbBwdRoXHgDYwugklqDO7_m_wFY4S7Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68089349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials.
Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and <20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity.
The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37>standard P37>P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity.
Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable.
CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intraoperative monitoring ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Nervous system ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Signal to noise ratio ; Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors ; Tibia ; Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869</ispartof><rights>2005 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16995748$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Zayed, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials.
Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and <20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity.
The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37>standard P37>P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity.
Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable.
CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative monitoring</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBgh5A6sm-C9_LJBQRQtSJRAqa8txxsWXxA4e3ytdno2Hw9GNVFasZuw539HYpyheMloxypq3u8pMzi8_Kk5pXVFZUdY9Ks5Z1_Ky62v-OPei60ou6_aseIa4o5S2VPKnxRlrMsMbdl78uXOD0xPBMOsUEDyGeCRwCD9hJEtI4NM6dj5FHRaIOrkDkDl4l0J0_v4d-QYmzDP4MY-CRzJozGjwBN29z2gKxAeHQFY2EJ3vjuiQBJv9l8klyCIbEPUlCUtys_ud-a-ivSSYdLaN2yn3uWEPW-Hz4onNBV5s9aL4fv3x7upTefvl5vPVh9vSyLpJpRC8b21ja2oFBRhYR7tBiL7hNWN6HHjd9MxKY7TomdDSDJxbIxsqhbEjl-KieHPyXWL4tQdManZoYJq0h7BH1WTDXsg-C-VJaGJ-UASrluhmHY-KUbWmpnbqlJpaU1NUqpxaxl5t_vthhvEB2mLKgtebQKPRk43aG4f_6Pq-buVq9P6kg_wbBwdRoXHgDYwugklqDO7_m_wFY4S7Kg</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>MacDonald, D.B.</creator><creator>Al Zayed, Z.</creator><creator>Stigsby, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><author>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative monitoring</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Zayed, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacDonald, D.B.</au><au>Al Zayed, Z.</au><au>Stigsby, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1858</spage><epage>1869</epage><pages>1858-1869</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials.
Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and <20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity.
The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37>standard P37>P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity.
Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable.
CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>16005261</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1388-2457 |
ispartof | Clinical neurophysiology, 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869 |
issn | 1388-2457 1872-8952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089349 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Electroencephalography - methods Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Intraoperative monitoring Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods Nervous system Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Signal to noise ratio Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception) interoception electrolocation. Sensory receptors Tibia Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tibial%20somatosensory%20evoked%20potential%20intraoperative%20monitoring:%20Recommendations%20based%20on%20signal%20to%20noise%20ratio%20analysis%20of%20popliteal%20fossa,%20optimized%20P37,%20standard%20P37,%20and%20P31%20potentials&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=MacDonald,%20D.B.&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1858&rft.epage=1869&rft.pages=1858-1869&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68089349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68089349&rft_id=info:pmid/16005261&rfr_iscdi=true |