Loading…

Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials

To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neurophysiology 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869
Main Authors: MacDonald, D.B., Al Zayed, Z., Stigsby, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243
container_end_page 1869
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1858
container_title Clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 116
creator MacDonald, D.B.
Al Zayed, Z.
Stigsby, B.
description To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and standard P37>P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity. Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable. CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245705001793</els_id><sourcerecordid>68089349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBgh5A6sm-C9_LJBQRQtSJRAqa8txxsWXxA4e3ytdno2Hw9GNVFasZuw539HYpyheMloxypq3u8pMzi8_Kk5pXVFZUdY9Ks5Z1_Ky62v-OPei60ou6_aseIa4o5S2VPKnxRlrMsMbdl78uXOD0xPBMOsUEDyGeCRwCD9hJEtI4NM6dj5FHRaIOrkDkDl4l0J0_v4d-QYmzDP4MY-CRzJozGjwBN29z2gKxAeHQFY2EJ3vjuiQBJv9l8klyCIbEPUlCUtys_ud-a-ivSSYdLaN2yn3uWEPW-Hz4onNBV5s9aL4fv3x7upTefvl5vPVh9vSyLpJpRC8b21ja2oFBRhYR7tBiL7hNWN6HHjd9MxKY7TomdDSDJxbIxsqhbEjl-KieHPyXWL4tQdManZoYJq0h7BH1WTDXsg-C-VJaGJ-UASrluhmHY-KUbWmpnbqlJpaU1NUqpxaxl5t_vthhvEB2mLKgtebQKPRk43aG4f_6Pq-buVq9P6kg_wbBwdRoXHgDYwugklqDO7_m_wFY4S7Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68089349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and &lt;20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity. The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37&gt;standard P37&gt;P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity. Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable. CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intraoperative monitoring ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Nervous system ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Signal to noise ratio ; Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors ; Tibia ; Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869</ispartof><rights>2005 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16995748$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Zayed, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and &lt;20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity. The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37&gt;standard P37&gt;P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity. Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable. CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative monitoring</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBgh5A6sm-C9_LJBQRQtSJRAqa8txxsWXxA4e3ytdno2Hw9GNVFasZuw539HYpyheMloxypq3u8pMzi8_Kk5pXVFZUdY9Ks5Z1_Ky62v-OPei60ou6_aseIa4o5S2VPKnxRlrMsMbdl78uXOD0xPBMOsUEDyGeCRwCD9hJEtI4NM6dj5FHRaIOrkDkDl4l0J0_v4d-QYmzDP4MY-CRzJozGjwBN29z2gKxAeHQFY2EJ3vjuiQBJv9l8klyCIbEPUlCUtys_ud-a-ivSSYdLaN2yn3uWEPW-Hz4onNBV5s9aL4fv3x7upTefvl5vPVh9vSyLpJpRC8b21ja2oFBRhYR7tBiL7hNWN6HHjd9MxKY7TomdDSDJxbIxsqhbEjl-KieHPyXWL4tQdManZoYJq0h7BH1WTDXsg-C-VJaGJ-UASrluhmHY-KUbWmpnbqlJpaU1NUqpxaxl5t_vthhvEB2mLKgtebQKPRk43aG4f_6Pq-buVq9P6kg_wbBwdRoXHgDYwugklqDO7_m_wFY4S7Kg</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>MacDonald, D.B.</creator><creator>Al Zayed, Z.</creator><creator>Stigsby, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</title><author>MacDonald, D.B. ; Al Zayed, Z. ; Stigsby, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative monitoring</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Zayed, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stigsby, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacDonald, D.B.</au><au>Al Zayed, Z.</au><au>Stigsby, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1858</spage><epage>1869</epage><pages>1858-1869</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>To compare the intraoperative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reproducibility and rapidity of popliteal fossa (PF), optimized P37, standard P37 and P31 potentials. Raw sweeps and 11 averages doubling sweep number from 2 to 2048 were compared in 37 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Optimized (highest amplitude or SNR) P37 derivations were Cz–CPc (22), CPz–CPc (27), Pz–CPc (7), iCPi–CPc (8), CPi–CPc (1), Cz–Pz (2) or Pz–FPz (3), and in two patients with non-decussation, Cz–CPi (1) or CPz–CPi (3). Standard P37 and P31 derivations were CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S. Signal amplitude was measured in 2048-sweep averages; peak noise was measured in raw sweeps and ± averages; SNR was amplitude/noise. Visual superimposability and &lt;20–30% amplitude variation determined reproducibility. Sweeps to reproducibility determined rapidity. The SNR order was PF≫optimized P37&gt;standard P37&gt;P31. Mean optimized P37 SNR advantages over the standard P37 and P31 were 2.1:1 and 4.9:1. SNR had powerful non-linear correlations to reproducibility and rapidity. Median sweeps to reproducibility were PF: 2, optimized P37: 128, standard P37: 512 and P31: 1024. EEG noise was greatest in FPz derivations. Burst-suppression increased scalp potential SNR and rapidity. Optimized P37 and PF recordings are most rapidly reproducible due to superior SNRs and are recommended. FPz should be avoided. Burst-suppression may be desirable. CPz–FPz and FPz–C5S should no longer be standard.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>16005261</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2457
ispartof Clinical neurophysiology, 2005-08, Vol.116 (8), p.1858-1869
issn 1388-2457
1872-8952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68089349
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording
Electroencephalography - methods
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Intraoperative monitoring
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Nervous system
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Signal to noise ratio
Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception)
interoception
electrolocation. Sensory receptors
Tibia
Tibial somatosensory evoked potentials
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tibial%20somatosensory%20evoked%20potential%20intraoperative%20monitoring:%20Recommendations%20based%20on%20signal%20to%20noise%20ratio%20analysis%20of%20popliteal%20fossa,%20optimized%20P37,%20standard%20P37,%20and%20P31%20potentials&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=MacDonald,%20D.B.&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1858&rft.epage=1869&rft.pages=1858-1869&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68089349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-33297f6f50f30eeb1808b33962511adb25691f4cca3913a4cb22fc46043cfd243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68089349&rft_id=info:pmid/16005261&rfr_iscdi=true