Loading…

Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers

To analyze the conventional biventricular pacing (BV) and the bifocal (BF) right ventricular (RV) pacing, and to perform a comparative analysis of these two techniques in relation to clinical, functional and echocardiographic parameters in a population without the exclusion criteria of the major stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 2007-06, Vol.88 (6), p.674-682
Main Authors: Rocha, Eduardo Arrais, Gondim, Tatiana Pereira, Abreu, Sebastião, Farias, Roberto, Marques, Vera, Rocha, Almino, Ribeiro, Demóstenes, Pereira, Ricardo, Negreiros, Pedro, Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M, Paes, Jr, José Nogueira
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 682
container_issue 6
container_start_page 674
container_title Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia
container_volume 88
creator Rocha, Eduardo Arrais
Gondim, Tatiana Pereira
Abreu, Sebastião
Farias, Roberto
Marques, Vera
Rocha, Almino
Ribeiro, Demóstenes
Pereira, Ricardo
Negreiros, Pedro
Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M
Paes, Jr, José Nogueira
description To analyze the conventional biventricular pacing (BV) and the bifocal (BF) right ventricular (RV) pacing, and to perform a comparative analysis of these two techniques in relation to clinical, functional and echocardiographic parameters in a population without the exclusion criteria of the major studies. A prospective non-randomized analysis of 36 patients undergoing surgery for multisite pacemaker implantation due to QRS > or =130 ms, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV congestive heart failure was performed. Favorable results of resynchronization were obtained with both techniques, with no significant differences in the comparison of the two groups, except for a higher QRS narrowing in the BV group, and a trend of a lower number or hospital admissions in the BV group. When the groups were analyzed separately and compared before and after the procedures, we observed that improvement was much more significant in the biventricular group, as were the more statistically relevant rates. Cardiac resynchronization therapy proved to be an efficient therapy in both groups analyzed, although with more significant outcomes in the biventricular group.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68106126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68106126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-14ce5d35511de6e937e952aeb13b9f91f9411a19a4d87cccf4594ea3fcefc0513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdBbK3-BcnKXSA38-q4k-KjUHBT3IabyZ12NJnEmUSov96CFbo68J2PszgXbA5KL3MBupix65Q-iqIsNZdXbAZaKWGMnLPqncIYvZ1ajFmkdAh2H_vgf3D0fXjIbN8NGH3YZbX_PlMxNEfieottFv1uP2bn7YCWOvykmG7YpcM20e0pF2z7_LRdveabt5f16nGTD1LIHIQl2XApARpSZLgmI0ukGnhtnAFnBACCQdEstbXWCWkEIXeWnC0k8AW7_5sdYv81URqrzidLbYuB-ilVagmFglIdxbuTONUdNdUQfYfxUP0_wn8BcORfDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68106126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais ; Gondim, Tatiana Pereira ; Abreu, Sebastião ; Farias, Roberto ; Marques, Vera ; Rocha, Almino ; Ribeiro, Demóstenes ; Pereira, Ricardo ; Negreiros, Pedro ; Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M ; Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais ; Gondim, Tatiana Pereira ; Abreu, Sebastião ; Farias, Roberto ; Marques, Vera ; Rocha, Almino ; Ribeiro, Demóstenes ; Pereira, Ricardo ; Negreiros, Pedro ; Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M ; Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the conventional biventricular pacing (BV) and the bifocal (BF) right ventricular (RV) pacing, and to perform a comparative analysis of these two techniques in relation to clinical, functional and echocardiographic parameters in a population without the exclusion criteria of the major studies. A prospective non-randomized analysis of 36 patients undergoing surgery for multisite pacemaker implantation due to QRS &gt; or =130 ms, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV congestive heart failure was performed. Favorable results of resynchronization were obtained with both techniques, with no significant differences in the comparison of the two groups, except for a higher QRS narrowing in the BV group, and a trend of a lower number or hospital admissions in the BV group. When the groups were analyzed separately and compared before and after the procedures, we observed that improvement was much more significant in the biventricular group, as were the more statistically relevant rates. Cardiac resynchronization therapy proved to be an efficient therapy in both groups analyzed, although with more significant outcomes in the biventricular group.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17664995</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - adverse effects ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - standards ; Echocardiography ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Heart Ventricles - anatomy &amp; histology ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - therapy</subject><ispartof>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2007-06, Vol.88 (6), p.674-682</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17664995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gondim, Tatiana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Sebastião</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farias, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Almino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Demóstenes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negreiros, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</creatorcontrib><title>Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers</title><title>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</title><addtitle>Arq Bras Cardiol</addtitle><description>To analyze the conventional biventricular pacing (BV) and the bifocal (BF) right ventricular (RV) pacing, and to perform a comparative analysis of these two techniques in relation to clinical, functional and echocardiographic parameters in a population without the exclusion criteria of the major studies. A prospective non-randomized analysis of 36 patients undergoing surgery for multisite pacemaker implantation due to QRS &gt; or =130 ms, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV congestive heart failure was performed. Favorable results of resynchronization were obtained with both techniques, with no significant differences in the comparison of the two groups, except for a higher QRS narrowing in the BV group, and a trend of a lower number or hospital admissions in the BV group. When the groups were analyzed separately and compared before and after the procedures, we observed that improvement was much more significant in the biventricular group, as were the more statistically relevant rates. Cardiac resynchronization therapy proved to be an efficient therapy in both groups analyzed, although with more significant outcomes in the biventricular group.</description><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - therapy</subject><issn>1678-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdBbK3-BcnKXSA38-q4k-KjUHBT3IabyZ12NJnEmUSov96CFbo68J2PszgXbA5KL3MBupix65Q-iqIsNZdXbAZaKWGMnLPqncIYvZ1ajFmkdAh2H_vgf3D0fXjIbN8NGH3YZbX_PlMxNEfieottFv1uP2bn7YCWOvykmG7YpcM20e0pF2z7_LRdveabt5f16nGTD1LIHIQl2XApARpSZLgmI0ukGnhtnAFnBACCQdEstbXWCWkEIXeWnC0k8AW7_5sdYv81URqrzidLbYuB-ilVagmFglIdxbuTONUdNdUQfYfxUP0_wn8BcORfDQ</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais</creator><creator>Gondim, Tatiana Pereira</creator><creator>Abreu, Sebastião</creator><creator>Farias, Roberto</creator><creator>Marques, Vera</creator><creator>Rocha, Almino</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Demóstenes</creator><creator>Pereira, Ricardo</creator><creator>Negreiros, Pedro</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M</creator><creator>Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers</title><author>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais ; Gondim, Tatiana Pereira ; Abreu, Sebastião ; Farias, Roberto ; Marques, Vera ; Rocha, Almino ; Ribeiro, Demóstenes ; Pereira, Ricardo ; Negreiros, Pedro ; Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M ; Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-14ce5d35511de6e937e952aeb13b9f91f9411a19a4d87cccf4594ea3fcefc0513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gondim, Tatiana Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Sebastião</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farias, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Almino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Demóstenes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negreiros, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Eduardo Arrais</au><au>Gondim, Tatiana Pereira</au><au>Abreu, Sebastião</au><au>Farias, Roberto</au><au>Marques, Vera</au><au>Rocha, Almino</au><au>Ribeiro, Demóstenes</au><au>Pereira, Ricardo</au><au>Negreiros, Pedro</au><au>Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto M</au><au>Paes, Jr, José Nogueira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers</atitle><jtitle>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</jtitle><addtitle>Arq Bras Cardiol</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>674</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>674-682</pages><eissn>1678-4170</eissn><abstract>To analyze the conventional biventricular pacing (BV) and the bifocal (BF) right ventricular (RV) pacing, and to perform a comparative analysis of these two techniques in relation to clinical, functional and echocardiographic parameters in a population without the exclusion criteria of the major studies. A prospective non-randomized analysis of 36 patients undergoing surgery for multisite pacemaker implantation due to QRS &gt; or =130 ms, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV congestive heart failure was performed. Favorable results of resynchronization were obtained with both techniques, with no significant differences in the comparison of the two groups, except for a higher QRS narrowing in the BV group, and a trend of a lower number or hospital admissions in the BV group. When the groups were analyzed separately and compared before and after the procedures, we observed that improvement was much more significant in the biventricular group, as were the more statistically relevant rates. Cardiac resynchronization therapy proved to be an efficient therapy in both groups analyzed, although with more significant outcomes in the biventricular group.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>17664995</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1678-4170
ispartof Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2007-06, Vol.88 (6), p.674-682
issn 1678-4170
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68106126
source SciELO
subjects Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - adverse effects
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - standards
Echocardiography
Heart Conduction System - physiopathology
Heart Failure - therapy
Heart Ventricles - anatomy & histology
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Prospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke Volume - physiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - therapy
title Ventricular resynchronization: comparing biventricular and bifocal right ventricular pacemakers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ventricular%20resynchronization:%20comparing%20biventricular%20and%20bifocal%20right%20ventricular%20pacemakers&rft.jtitle=Arquivos%20brasileiros%20de%20cardiologia&rft.au=Rocha,%20Eduardo%20Arrais&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=674&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=674-682&rft.eissn=1678-4170&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68106126%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-14ce5d35511de6e937e952aeb13b9f91f9411a19a4d87cccf4594ea3fcefc0513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68106126&rft_id=info:pmid/17664995&rfr_iscdi=true