Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children and adolescents

• Published in: The American journal of clinical nutrition 2006-11, Vol.84 (5), p.1014-1020
• Main Authors: Kim, Jaehee, Shen, Wei, Gallagher, Dympna, Jones, Alfredo Jr, Wang, ZiMian, Wang, Jack, Heshka, Stanley, Heymsfield, Steven B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon - methods; Absorptiometry, Photon - standards; Adolescent; adolescent nutrition; adolescents; Biological and medical sciences; body composition; Body Composition - physiology; Body fat; Child; child nutrition; Child, Preschool; children; Children & youth; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Feeding. Feeding behavior; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Growth - physiology; human development; human growth; human physiology; Humans; image analysis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; maturity stage; measurement; Measurement techniques; Models, Biological; muscle tissues; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Muscular system; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Pediatrics; prediction; Predictive Value of Tests; puberty; Puberty - physiology; quantitative analysis; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; skeletal muscle; Teenagers; temporal variation; tissue weight; validity; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
• ISSN: 0002-9165; 1938-3207
• DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1014

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle (SM) is an important compartment but is difficult to quantify in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the potential of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring total-body SM in pediatric subjects. DESIGN: A previously published adult DXA SM prediction formula was evaluated in children and adolescents aged 5-17 y (n = 99) who varied in pubertal maturation stage. SM estimated by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used as the reference. The adult SM model was not accurate for subjects below Tanner stage 5 (n = 65; aged 5-14 y). New pediatric SM prediction models were therefore developed and validated in a separate group (n = 18). RESULTS: The adult DXA SM prediction model was valid in subjects at Tanner stage 5 but significantly (P < 0.001) overestimated SM in subjects below Tanner stage 5. New SM prediction formulas were developed with appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) estimates by DXA as the main predictor variable (eg, model 1, ALST alone: R² = 0.982, SEE = 0.565 kg, P < 0.001). The new models were validated by the leave-one-out method and were cross-validated in a separate validation group. CONCLUSIONS: A previously reported adult DXA SM prediction model is applicable in children and adolescents late in pubertal development (Tanner stage 5). A new DXA SM prediction model was developed for prepubertal and pubertal subjects (Tanner stage =5 y. DXA thus provides an important opportunity for quantifying total-body SM mass across most of the human life span.