Loading…

Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders

Aim This study examined pattern of attachment in cohort of women with an eating disorder to determine what types of self‐protective strategies they used, and further whether there was a specific relationship between strategy and diagnosis. Method The participants were 62 young women with an eating d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European eating disorders review 2007-03, Vol.15 (2), p.119-130
Main Authors: Ringer, Francoise, Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23
container_end_page 130
container_issue 2
container_start_page 119
container_title European eating disorders review
container_volume 15
creator Ringer, Francoise
Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey
description Aim This study examined pattern of attachment in cohort of women with an eating disorder to determine what types of self‐protective strategies they used, and further whether there was a specific relationship between strategy and diagnosis. Method The participants were 62 young women with an eating disorder (19 with anorexia nervosa, 26 with bulimia nervosa and 17 with bulimic anorexia). Attachment was assessed using the Adult attachment interview (AAI), classified using Crittenden's Dynamic‐Maturational Method. Results The results indicated that all women with an eating disorder were anxiously attached. About half used an extreme coercive Type C strategy while most of the others combined coercion with an extreme dismissing Type A strategy. The content of the AAIs suggested lack of resolution of trauma or loss among the mothers and also of hidden family conflict between the parents. This in turn elicited extreme strategies for generating parent–child contingency from the daughters. Conclusions Central in almost all cases was the women's confusion regarding how parental behaviour was tied causally to their own behaviour. Questions are raised regarding the focus of treatment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/erv.761
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68135023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68135023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LIzEYBeAgLn6t-A8keKEXMm4ymUkm3onUukvXFakKehHS5I0dnY-aTHX7741MURC8SkgeDoeD0A4lR5SQ9Bf4lyPB6QraoETKhEherL7fRZpklLF1tBnCIyHxPS_W0DoVXHBekA10P9Bd2TxgW4bWW_AB68Zi3XXaTGtoumPcTQGDc2C6gFuHp6W10GCn67Ja4JlvDYQA8avB8CXqJ_rhdBVge3luoeuzwfj0PBn9G_4-PRklJnajSSa0Nmk2kTQHylzBBDBDNOUkpY7YTBDgUkImpSUypylzZmKZFk4YzQpI2Rba73Njm-c5hE7VZTBQVbqBdh4ULyjLScoi3PsCH9u5b2I3ldIsK3Ke04gOemR8G4IHp2a-rLVfKErU-9gqjq3i2FHuLuPmkxrsp1uuG8FhD17LChbf5ajB1U0fl_S6DB38_9DaPykumMjV7cVQ_bkcD-_O_o7UmL0B-WOW7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214485651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ringer, Francoise ; Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</creator><creatorcontrib>Ringer, Francoise ; Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</creatorcontrib><description>Aim This study examined pattern of attachment in cohort of women with an eating disorder to determine what types of self‐protective strategies they used, and further whether there was a specific relationship between strategy and diagnosis. Method The participants were 62 young women with an eating disorder (19 with anorexia nervosa, 26 with bulimia nervosa and 17 with bulimic anorexia). Attachment was assessed using the Adult attachment interview (AAI), classified using Crittenden's Dynamic‐Maturational Method. Results The results indicated that all women with an eating disorder were anxiously attached. About half used an extreme coercive Type C strategy while most of the others combined coercion with an extreme dismissing Type A strategy. The content of the AAIs suggested lack of resolution of trauma or loss among the mothers and also of hidden family conflict between the parents. This in turn elicited extreme strategies for generating parent–child contingency from the daughters. Conclusions Central in almost all cases was the women's confusion regarding how parental behaviour was tied causally to their own behaviour. Questions are raised regarding the focus of treatment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-4133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/erv.761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17676680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anorexia Nervosa - psychology ; attachment ; Australia ; Bulimia Nervosa - psychology ; Cluster Analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Conflict ; Daughters ; Defense Mechanisms ; eating disorder ; Eating disorders ; Emotions ; Families &amp; family life ; Family - psychology ; family systems ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Object Attachment ; Parent-Child Relations ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Personal relationships ; Women ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>European eating disorders review, 2007-03, Vol.15 (2), p.119-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</rights><rights>2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Mar/Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17676680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ringer, Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</creatorcontrib><title>Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders</title><title>European eating disorders review</title><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><description>Aim This study examined pattern of attachment in cohort of women with an eating disorder to determine what types of self‐protective strategies they used, and further whether there was a specific relationship between strategy and diagnosis. Method The participants were 62 young women with an eating disorder (19 with anorexia nervosa, 26 with bulimia nervosa and 17 with bulimic anorexia). Attachment was assessed using the Adult attachment interview (AAI), classified using Crittenden's Dynamic‐Maturational Method. Results The results indicated that all women with an eating disorder were anxiously attached. About half used an extreme coercive Type C strategy while most of the others combined coercion with an extreme dismissing Type A strategy. The content of the AAIs suggested lack of resolution of trauma or loss among the mothers and also of hidden family conflict between the parents. This in turn elicited extreme strategies for generating parent–child contingency from the daughters. Conclusions Central in almost all cases was the women's confusion regarding how parental behaviour was tied causally to their own behaviour. Questions are raised regarding the focus of treatment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anorexia Nervosa - psychology</subject><subject>attachment</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bulimia Nervosa - psychology</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Daughters</subject><subject>Defense Mechanisms</subject><subject>eating disorder</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>family systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1072-4133</issn><issn>1099-0968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10F1LIzEYBeAgLn6t-A8keKEXMm4ymUkm3onUukvXFakKehHS5I0dnY-aTHX7741MURC8SkgeDoeD0A4lR5SQ9Bf4lyPB6QraoETKhEherL7fRZpklLF1tBnCIyHxPS_W0DoVXHBekA10P9Bd2TxgW4bWW_AB68Zi3XXaTGtoumPcTQGDc2C6gFuHp6W10GCn67Ja4JlvDYQA8avB8CXqJ_rhdBVge3luoeuzwfj0PBn9G_4-PRklJnajSSa0Nmk2kTQHylzBBDBDNOUkpY7YTBDgUkImpSUypylzZmKZFk4YzQpI2Rba73Njm-c5hE7VZTBQVbqBdh4ULyjLScoi3PsCH9u5b2I3ldIsK3Ke04gOemR8G4IHp2a-rLVfKErU-9gqjq3i2FHuLuPmkxrsp1uuG8FhD17LChbf5ajB1U0fl_S6DB38_9DaPykumMjV7cVQ_bkcD-_O_o7UmL0B-WOW7g</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Ringer, Francoise</creator><creator>Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders</title><author>Ringer, Francoise ; Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anorexia Nervosa - psychology</topic><topic>attachment</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bulimia Nervosa - psychology</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Daughters</topic><topic>Defense Mechanisms</topic><topic>eating disorder</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>family systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ringer, Francoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ringer, Francoise</au><au>Crittenden, Patricia McKinsey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders</atitle><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>119-130</pages><issn>1072-4133</issn><eissn>1099-0968</eissn><abstract>Aim This study examined pattern of attachment in cohort of women with an eating disorder to determine what types of self‐protective strategies they used, and further whether there was a specific relationship between strategy and diagnosis. Method The participants were 62 young women with an eating disorder (19 with anorexia nervosa, 26 with bulimia nervosa and 17 with bulimic anorexia). Attachment was assessed using the Adult attachment interview (AAI), classified using Crittenden's Dynamic‐Maturational Method. Results The results indicated that all women with an eating disorder were anxiously attached. About half used an extreme coercive Type C strategy while most of the others combined coercion with an extreme dismissing Type A strategy. The content of the AAIs suggested lack of resolution of trauma or loss among the mothers and also of hidden family conflict between the parents. This in turn elicited extreme strategies for generating parent–child contingency from the daughters. Conclusions Central in almost all cases was the women's confusion regarding how parental behaviour was tied causally to their own behaviour. Questions are raised regarding the focus of treatment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>17676680</pmid><doi>10.1002/erv.761</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-4133
ispartof European eating disorders review, 2007-03, Vol.15 (2), p.119-130
issn 1072-4133
1099-0968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68135023
source Wiley
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anorexia Nervosa - psychology
attachment
Australia
Bulimia Nervosa - psychology
Cluster Analysis
Cohort Studies
Conflict
Daughters
Defense Mechanisms
eating disorder
Eating disorders
Emotions
Families & family life
Family - psychology
family systems
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Object Attachment
Parent-Child Relations
Parents & parenting
Personal relationships
Women
Young adults
title Eating disorders and attachment: the effects of hidden family processes on eating disorders
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eating%20disorders%20and%20attachment:%20the%20effects%20of%20hidden%20family%20processes%20on%20eating%20disorders&rft.jtitle=European%20eating%20disorders%20review&rft.au=Ringer,%20Francoise&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=119-130&rft.issn=1072-4133&rft.eissn=1099-0968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/erv.761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68135023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4131-47aac24b915e13f837e3c0a16021f0d470e699e499d095123fcbd3a7f7ca38e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214485651&rft_id=info:pmid/17676680&rfr_iscdi=true