Loading…

Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate histologic findings and outcomes among adolescents with cervical dysplasia. Study Design Patient charts (2001-2005) were reviewed. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and progression and regression were recorded. R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007-08, Vol.197 (2), p.141.e1-141.e6
Main Authors: Moore, Kathleen, MD, Cofer, Amanda, DO, Elliot, Leslie, MD, Lanneau, Grainger, MD, Walker, Joan, MD, Gold, Michael A., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate histologic findings and outcomes among adolescents with cervical dysplasia. Study Design Patient charts (2001-2005) were reviewed. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and progression and regression were recorded. Results Five hundred one patients were identified. On biopsy, 324 patients (65%) had CIN 1 or less, and 177 patients (35%) had CIN ≥2. Twenty-nine percent of the patients with CIN 2 opted for conservative treatment vs excision. Over 18 months, the condition of 65% of the patients regressed; the condition of 20% of the patients was stable, and the condition of 5% of the patients progressed without cancer. Of the patients who underwent excision (follow-up median, 26 months), 84% experienced regression of their condition; the condition of 11% was persistent, and 5% progressed with no cancer. Conclusion CIN ≥2 is present in 35% of our cohort. Most had CIN 2, and most experienced regression. Our observation supports continued vigilance in the evaluation of adolescents but suggests that less intervention for CIN 2 may be acceptable.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.029