Loading…
Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?
The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previo...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2006-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2768-2774 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983 |
container_end_page | 2774 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2768 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Herrmann, Karin A Bonél, H M Stäbler, A Voelk, M Strotzer, M Zech, C J Reiser, M F |
description | The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previous and subsequent digital storage phosphor radiography (SPR, gold standard) had follow-up chest radiographs with CsI/a-Si FDR. Four observers confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of pneumothorax according to a five-point scale first on the 1K soft-copy image and then with help of 3K zoom function (1K monitor). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each modality (1K and 3K). The area under the curve (AUC) values for each observer were 0.7815, 0.7779, 0.7946 and 0.7066 with 1K-matrix soft copies and 0.8123, 0.7997, 0.8078 and 0.7522 with 3K zoom. Overall detection of pneumothorax was better with 3K zoom. Differences between the two display methods were not statistically significant in 3 of 4 observers (p-values between 0.13 and 0.44; observer 4: p = 0.02). The detection of pneumothorax with 3K zoom is better than with 1K soft copy but not at a statistically significant level. Differences between both display methods may be subtle. Still, our results indicate that 3K zoom should be employed in clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-006-0344-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68181974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127412872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFqFTEUhoNY7LX6AG4kILiLTSa5k8lKpFQrLXRRXYdzkxNvysxkTDLQ-jw-qCn3gtBVIHz_d87hJ-Sd4J8E5_q8cC4lZ5z3jEulmHlBNkLJjgk-qJdkw40cmDZGnZLXpdxzzo1Q-hU5Ff1ges3lhvy926d19FRe0z8pTTSss6sxzXSHdC3oaUiZeqx4-E2BLjOuU6r7lOGBxpk6LHGdaEw-ejyHKeWlKQstcYyuRcIIlS0w43j0NGEGH9OvDMu-0CVjwbm2UQ0W12yCmuMDLSlU6tISsXx-Q04CjAXfHt8z8vPr5Y-LK3Zz--37xZcb5mSnKwMwoHXQ0nV-a9Tg0aCBjnvBe62Vczu11bIbdC960_d6K4MAUA4AQkAzyDPy8eBdcvq9Yql2isXhOLbt20m2H8QgjFYN_PAMvE9rnttuVopOK9GGdI0SB8rlVErGYJccJ8iPVnD7VKA9FGhbgfapQGta5v3RvO4m9P8Tx8bkP3wEmSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3127412872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Herrmann, Karin A ; Bonél, H M ; Stäbler, A ; Voelk, M ; Strotzer, M ; Zech, C J ; Reiser, M F</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Karin A ; Bonél, H M ; Stäbler, A ; Voelk, M ; Strotzer, M ; Zech, C J ; Reiser, M F</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previous and subsequent digital storage phosphor radiography (SPR, gold standard) had follow-up chest radiographs with CsI/a-Si FDR. Four observers confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of pneumothorax according to a five-point scale first on the 1K soft-copy image and then with help of 3K zoom function (1K monitor). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each modality (1K and 3K). The area under the curve (AUC) values for each observer were 0.7815, 0.7779, 0.7946 and 0.7066 with 1K-matrix soft copies and 0.8123, 0.7997, 0.8078 and 0.7522 with 3K zoom. Overall detection of pneumothorax was better with 3K zoom. Differences between the two display methods were not statistically significant in 3 of 4 observers (p-values between 0.13 and 0.44; observer 4: p = 0.02). The detection of pneumothorax with 3K zoom is better than with 1K soft copy but not at a statistically significant level. Differences between both display methods may be subtle. Still, our results indicate that 3K zoom should be employed in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0344-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16896703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Amorphous silicon ; Area Under Curve ; Cesium ; Cesium iodides ; Contrast Media ; Digital imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Iodides ; Iohexol - analogs & derivatives ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Observers ; Phosphors ; Pneumothorax ; Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Radiography, Thoracic - instrumentation ; Silicon ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; X-Ray Intensifying Screens</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2006-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2768-2774</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16896703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Karin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonél, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stäbler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voelk, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strotzer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zech, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, M F</creatorcontrib><title>Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previous and subsequent digital storage phosphor radiography (SPR, gold standard) had follow-up chest radiographs with CsI/a-Si FDR. Four observers confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of pneumothorax according to a five-point scale first on the 1K soft-copy image and then with help of 3K zoom function (1K monitor). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each modality (1K and 3K). The area under the curve (AUC) values for each observer were 0.7815, 0.7779, 0.7946 and 0.7066 with 1K-matrix soft copies and 0.8123, 0.7997, 0.8078 and 0.7522 with 3K zoom. Overall detection of pneumothorax was better with 3K zoom. Differences between the two display methods were not statistically significant in 3 of 4 observers (p-values between 0.13 and 0.44; observer 4: p = 0.02). The detection of pneumothorax with 3K zoom is better than with 1K soft copy but not at a statistically significant level. Differences between both display methods may be subtle. Still, our results indicate that 3K zoom should be employed in clinical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amorphous silicon</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Cesium</subject><subject>Cesium iodides</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iodides</subject><subject>Iohexol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Phosphors</subject><subject>Pneumothorax</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFqFTEUhoNY7LX6AG4kILiLTSa5k8lKpFQrLXRRXYdzkxNvysxkTDLQ-jw-qCn3gtBVIHz_d87hJ-Sd4J8E5_q8cC4lZ5z3jEulmHlBNkLJjgk-qJdkw40cmDZGnZLXpdxzzo1Q-hU5Ff1ges3lhvy926d19FRe0z8pTTSss6sxzXSHdC3oaUiZeqx4-E2BLjOuU6r7lOGBxpk6LHGdaEw-ejyHKeWlKQstcYyuRcIIlS0w43j0NGEGH9OvDMu-0CVjwbm2UQ0W12yCmuMDLSlU6tISsXx-Q04CjAXfHt8z8vPr5Y-LK3Zz--37xZcb5mSnKwMwoHXQ0nV-a9Tg0aCBjnvBe62Vczu11bIbdC960_d6K4MAUA4AQkAzyDPy8eBdcvq9Yql2isXhOLbt20m2H8QgjFYN_PAMvE9rnttuVopOK9GGdI0SB8rlVErGYJccJ8iPVnD7VKA9FGhbgfapQGta5v3RvO4m9P8Tx8bkP3wEmSQ</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Herrmann, Karin A</creator><creator>Bonél, H M</creator><creator>Stäbler, A</creator><creator>Voelk, M</creator><creator>Strotzer, M</creator><creator>Zech, C J</creator><creator>Reiser, M F</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?</title><author>Herrmann, Karin A ; Bonél, H M ; Stäbler, A ; Voelk, M ; Strotzer, M ; Zech, C J ; Reiser, M F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amorphous silicon</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Cesium</topic><topic>Cesium iodides</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iodides</topic><topic>Iohexol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Phosphors</topic><topic>Pneumothorax</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Karin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonél, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stäbler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voelk, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strotzer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zech, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, M F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrmann, Karin A</au><au>Bonél, H M</au><au>Stäbler, A</au><au>Voelk, M</au><au>Strotzer, M</au><au>Zech, C J</au><au>Reiser, M F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2768</spage><epage>2774</epage><pages>2768-2774</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previous and subsequent digital storage phosphor radiography (SPR, gold standard) had follow-up chest radiographs with CsI/a-Si FDR. Four observers confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of pneumothorax according to a five-point scale first on the 1K soft-copy image and then with help of 3K zoom function (1K monitor). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each modality (1K and 3K). The area under the curve (AUC) values for each observer were 0.7815, 0.7779, 0.7946 and 0.7066 with 1K-matrix soft copies and 0.8123, 0.7997, 0.8078 and 0.7522 with 3K zoom. Overall detection of pneumothorax was better with 3K zoom. Differences between the two display methods were not statistically significant in 3 of 4 observers (p-values between 0.13 and 0.44; observer 4: p = 0.02). The detection of pneumothorax with 3K zoom is better than with 1K soft copy but not at a statistically significant level. Differences between both display methods may be subtle. Still, our results indicate that 3K zoom should be employed in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16896703</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-006-0344-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2006-12, Vol.16 (12), p.2768-2774 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68181974 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Aged Amorphous silicon Area Under Curve Cesium Cesium iodides Contrast Media Digital imaging Female Humans Iodides Iohexol - analogs & derivatives Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Observer Variation Observers Phosphors Pneumothorax Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging Radiographs Radiography Radiography, Thoracic - instrumentation Silicon Statistical analysis Statistical methods X-Ray Intensifying Screens |
title | Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%203K%20zoom%20function%20be%20used%20for%20detection%20of%20pneumothorax%20in%20cesium%20iodide/amorphous%20silicon%20flat-panel%20detector%20radiographs%20presented%20on%201K-matrix%20soft%20copies?&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Herrmann,%20Karin%20A&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2768&rft.epage=2774&rft.pages=2768-2774&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-006-0344-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3127412872%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-aa9a77f73c2d5948de9e9a20d106774ccb4573287616966753f1aa4caaaffe983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127412872&rft_id=info:pmid/16896703&rfr_iscdi=true |