A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI

Pre-natal diagnosis of intra-abdominal pregnancy is difficult. Ultrasound has been the frontline modality to date; however, it gives a diagnostic error of 50-90% and its use is disappointing. In recent years, MRI has emerged as an appealing imaging modality. With its good soft tissue contrast and no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of radiology 2007-07, Vol.80 (955), p.e134-e136
Main Authors: Teng, H C, Kumar, G, Ramli, N M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Cesarean Section
Cicatrix - pathology
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Placenta Accreta - pathology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnancy, Abdominal - diagnosis
Rupture, Spontaneous - diagnosis
Uterus - injuries
Uterus - pathology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993
container_end_page e136
container_issue 955
container_start_page e134
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 80
creator Teng, H C
Kumar, G
Ramli, N M
description Pre-natal diagnosis of intra-abdominal pregnancy is difficult. Ultrasound has been the frontline modality to date; however, it gives a diagnostic error of 50-90% and its use is disappointing. In recent years, MRI has emerged as an appealing imaging modality. With its good soft tissue contrast and non-ionizing property, it acts as a means of definitive non-invasive assessment before surgical intervention when ultrasound is inconclusive.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr/67136731
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68182298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68182298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUgIMobk5vniUnT9YladKk3sbwx2AiyA7ean6OjjaZSSvsv7dzE0-P9_j44H0AXGN0jwkrp2oTpwXHecFzfALGmFORCYE-TsEYIcQzTAQbgYuUNvuVlegcjDDniOZIjMHnDH7XUjUWJquDNzLuYO27KDOpTGhrLxu4jXbtpdc7GG3qm672a-hiaGHst10fLQwO9p2NtR8sWsYHGEPze319X1yCMyebZK-OcwJWT4-r-Uu2fHtezGfLTBOOukwXLFdYF4phZ60pC025VUYQR5kQlijDKSmRM4wZwik1mBZsoGVpcleW-QTcHrTbGL56m7qqrZO2TSO9DX2qCoEFIaUYwLsDqGNIKVpXbWPdDm9XGFX7oNUQtPoLOuA3R2-vWmv-4WPB_Ad5BHIh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68182298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Teng, H C ; Kumar, G ; Ramli, N M</creator><creatorcontrib>Teng, H C ; Kumar, G ; Ramli, N M</creatorcontrib><description>Pre-natal diagnosis of intra-abdominal pregnancy is difficult. Ultrasound has been the frontline modality to date; however, it gives a diagnostic error of 50-90% and its use is disappointing. In recent years, MRI has emerged as an appealing imaging modality. With its good soft tissue contrast and non-ionizing property, it acts as a means of definitive non-invasive assessment before surgical intervention when ultrasound is inconclusive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr/67136731</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17704308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cesarean Section ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Placenta Accreta - pathology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third ; Pregnancy, Abdominal - diagnosis ; Rupture, Spontaneous - diagnosis ; Uterus - injuries ; Uterus - pathology</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2007-07, Vol.80 (955), p.e134-e136</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17704308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teng, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramli, N M</creatorcontrib><title>A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Pre-natal diagnosis of intra-abdominal pregnancy is difficult. Ultrasound has been the frontline modality to date; however, it gives a diagnostic error of 50-90% and its use is disappointing. In recent years, MRI has emerged as an appealing imaging modality. With its good soft tissue contrast and non-ionizing property, it acts as a means of definitive non-invasive assessment before surgical intervention when ultrasound is inconclusive.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Placenta Accreta - pathology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Abdominal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rupture, Spontaneous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterus - injuries</subject><subject>Uterus - pathology</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUgIMobk5vniUnT9YladKk3sbwx2AiyA7ean6OjjaZSSvsv7dzE0-P9_j44H0AXGN0jwkrp2oTpwXHecFzfALGmFORCYE-TsEYIcQzTAQbgYuUNvuVlegcjDDniOZIjMHnDH7XUjUWJquDNzLuYO27KDOpTGhrLxu4jXbtpdc7GG3qm672a-hiaGHst10fLQwO9p2NtR8sWsYHGEPze319X1yCMyebZK-OcwJWT4-r-Uu2fHtezGfLTBOOukwXLFdYF4phZ60pC025VUYQR5kQlijDKSmRM4wZwik1mBZsoGVpcleW-QTcHrTbGL56m7qqrZO2TSO9DX2qCoEFIaUYwLsDqGNIKVpXbWPdDm9XGFX7oNUQtPoLOuA3R2-vWmv-4WPB_Ad5BHIh</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Teng, H C</creator><creator>Kumar, G</creator><creator>Ramli, N M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI</title><author>Teng, H C ; Kumar, G ; Ramli, N M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Placenta Accreta - pathology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Abdominal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rupture, Spontaneous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterus - injuries</topic><topic>Uterus - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teng, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramli, N M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teng, H C</au><au>Kumar, G</au><au>Ramli, N M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>955</issue><spage>e134</spage><epage>e136</epage><pages>e134-e136</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Pre-natal diagnosis of intra-abdominal pregnancy is difficult. Ultrasound has been the frontline modality to date; however, it gives a diagnostic error of 50-90% and its use is disappointing. In recent years, MRI has emerged as an appealing imaging modality. With its good soft tissue contrast and non-ionizing property, it acts as a means of definitive non-invasive assessment before surgical intervention when ultrasound is inconclusive.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17704308</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr/67136731</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2007-07, Vol.80 (955), p.e134-e136
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68182298
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Cesarean Section
Cicatrix - pathology
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Placenta Accreta - pathology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnancy, Abdominal - diagnosis
Rupture, Spontaneous - diagnosis
Uterus - injuries
Uterus - pathology
title A viable secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy resulting from rupture of uterine scar: role of MRI
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20viable%20secondary%20intra-abdominal%20pregnancy%20resulting%20from%20rupture%20of%20uterine%20scar:%20role%20of%20MRI&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Teng,%20H%20C&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=955&rft.spage=e134&rft.epage=e136&rft.pages=e134-e136&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr/67136731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68182298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c653b1c6b51feed96c47ebd82f4588e2bd74290fd55d2744d14656b5a9d3f993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68182298&rft_id=info:pmid/17704308&rfr_iscdi=true