Loading…
Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions
Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393 |
container_end_page | 933 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 925 |
container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Kaasen, A. Tuveng, J. Heiberg, A. Scott, H. Haugen, G. |
description | Objective
To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester.
Methods
This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated.
Results
Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85).
Conclusion
Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.3871 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68197163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68197163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9K7DAUBvAgV66jXvAJJJt7cVNNmjRp3MngPxDc6LqcSU6l0knGpEVm5yP4jPdJTJ0BV-IiBMKP75x8hBxxdsoZK8_G8HQqas13yIxLZQqmWfWLzJhRrNDKlHtkP6VnxpiSQv0me1zzkksuZwTnIUbsYeiCpwscXhE9XUX0MEBPx36IkMLoHYXpjENYpTVtO-86_5TOKdA0jG5NQ0sT2uDd_7f3IXZLTANGCosQp-B0SHZb6BP-2d4H5PHq8mF-U9zdX9_OL-4Km5fhheTOKaVsa0CL1oGoqlq4mgGTrCq1QAuqLllpoDYVs1oJMBVKLWV-0MKIA_Jvk7uK4WXMSzTLLlnse_AYxtSomhvNlfgRclNqWXGe4ckG2hhSitg2q_w9iOuGs2bqvsndN1P3mR5vM8fFEt0X3Jadwd8tgGShbyN426UvVwsxDc2u2LjXrsf1twObx_vrz8EfcEKbtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19274511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester.
Methods
This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated.
Results
Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85).
Conclusion
Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.3871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17121414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging ; Abortion, Eugenic ; autopsy ; Autopsy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Fetal Diseases - mortality ; fetal malformation ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; prenatal ultrasound ; Retrospective Studies ; termination of pregnancy ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18337451$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17121414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuveng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiberg, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester.
Methods
This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated.
Results
Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85).
Conclusion
Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Abortion, Eugenic</subject><subject>autopsy</subject><subject>Autopsy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>fetal malformation</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>prenatal ultrasound</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>termination of pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M9K7DAUBvAgV66jXvAJJJt7cVNNmjRp3MngPxDc6LqcSU6l0knGpEVm5yP4jPdJTJ0BV-IiBMKP75x8hBxxdsoZK8_G8HQqas13yIxLZQqmWfWLzJhRrNDKlHtkP6VnxpiSQv0me1zzkksuZwTnIUbsYeiCpwscXhE9XUX0MEBPx36IkMLoHYXpjENYpTVtO-86_5TOKdA0jG5NQ0sT2uDd_7f3IXZLTANGCosQp-B0SHZb6BP-2d4H5PHq8mF-U9zdX9_OL-4Km5fhheTOKaVsa0CL1oGoqlq4mgGTrCq1QAuqLllpoDYVs1oJMBVKLWV-0MKIA_Jvk7uK4WXMSzTLLlnse_AYxtSomhvNlfgRclNqWXGe4ckG2hhSitg2q_w9iOuGs2bqvsndN1P3mR5vM8fFEt0X3Jadwd8tgGShbyN426UvVwsxDc2u2LjXrsf1twObx_vrz8EfcEKbtg</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Kaasen, A.</creator><creator>Tuveng, J.</creator><creator>Heiberg, A.</creator><creator>Scott, H.</creator><creator>Haugen, G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><author>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Abortion, Eugenic</topic><topic>autopsy</topic><topic>Autopsy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>fetal malformation</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>prenatal ultrasound</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>termination of pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuveng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiberg, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaasen, A.</au><au>Tuveng, J.</au><au>Heiberg, A.</au><au>Scott, H.</au><au>Haugen, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>933</epage><pages>925-933</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester.
Methods
This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated.
Results
Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85).
Conclusion
Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>17121414</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.3871</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933 |
issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68197163 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging Abortion, Eugenic autopsy Autopsy - methods Biological and medical sciences Birth control Female Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging Fetal Diseases - mortality fetal malformation Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion Infant, Newborn Male Medical sciences Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, Second Prenatal Diagnosis prenatal ultrasound Retrospective Studies termination of pregnancy Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods |
title | Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20prenatal%20ultrasound%20and%20autopsy%20findings:%20a%20study%20of%20second%E2%80%90trimester%20abortions&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Kaasen,%20A.&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=933&rft.pages=925-933&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.3871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68197163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19274511&rft_id=info:pmid/17121414&rfr_iscdi=true |