Loading…

Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions

Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933
Main Authors: Kaasen, A., Tuveng, J., Heiberg, A., Scott, H., Haugen, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393
container_end_page 933
container_issue 7
container_start_page 925
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 28
creator Kaasen, A.
Tuveng, J.
Heiberg, A.
Scott, H.
Haugen, G.
description Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated. Results Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85). Conclusion Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.3871
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68197163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68197163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9K7DAUBvAgV66jXvAJJJt7cVNNmjRp3MngPxDc6LqcSU6l0knGpEVm5yP4jPdJTJ0BV-IiBMKP75x8hBxxdsoZK8_G8HQqas13yIxLZQqmWfWLzJhRrNDKlHtkP6VnxpiSQv0me1zzkksuZwTnIUbsYeiCpwscXhE9XUX0MEBPx36IkMLoHYXpjENYpTVtO-86_5TOKdA0jG5NQ0sT2uDd_7f3IXZLTANGCosQp-B0SHZb6BP-2d4H5PHq8mF-U9zdX9_OL-4Km5fhheTOKaVsa0CL1oGoqlq4mgGTrCq1QAuqLllpoDYVs1oJMBVKLWV-0MKIA_Jvk7uK4WXMSzTLLlnse_AYxtSomhvNlfgRclNqWXGe4ckG2hhSitg2q_w9iOuGs2bqvsndN1P3mR5vM8fFEt0X3Jadwd8tgGShbyN426UvVwsxDc2u2LjXrsf1twObx_vrz8EfcEKbtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19274511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated. Results Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85). Conclusion Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.3871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17121414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging ; Abortion, Eugenic ; autopsy ; Autopsy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Fetal Diseases - mortality ; fetal malformation ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; prenatal ultrasound ; Retrospective Studies ; termination of pregnancy ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18337451$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17121414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuveng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiberg, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated. Results Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85). Conclusion Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Abortion, Eugenic</subject><subject>autopsy</subject><subject>Autopsy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>fetal malformation</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>prenatal ultrasound</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>termination of pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M9K7DAUBvAgV66jXvAJJJt7cVNNmjRp3MngPxDc6LqcSU6l0knGpEVm5yP4jPdJTJ0BV-IiBMKP75x8hBxxdsoZK8_G8HQqas13yIxLZQqmWfWLzJhRrNDKlHtkP6VnxpiSQv0me1zzkksuZwTnIUbsYeiCpwscXhE9XUX0MEBPx36IkMLoHYXpjENYpTVtO-86_5TOKdA0jG5NQ0sT2uDd_7f3IXZLTANGCosQp-B0SHZb6BP-2d4H5PHq8mF-U9zdX9_OL-4Km5fhheTOKaVsa0CL1oGoqlq4mgGTrCq1QAuqLllpoDYVs1oJMBVKLWV-0MKIA_Jvk7uK4WXMSzTLLlnse_AYxtSomhvNlfgRclNqWXGe4ckG2hhSitg2q_w9iOuGs2bqvsndN1P3mR5vM8fFEt0X3Jadwd8tgGShbyN426UvVwsxDc2u2LjXrsf1twObx_vrz8EfcEKbtg</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Kaasen, A.</creator><creator>Tuveng, J.</creator><creator>Heiberg, A.</creator><creator>Scott, H.</creator><creator>Haugen, G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</title><author>Kaasen, A. ; Tuveng, J. ; Heiberg, A. ; Scott, H. ; Haugen, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Abortion, Eugenic</topic><topic>autopsy</topic><topic>Autopsy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>fetal malformation</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>prenatal ultrasound</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>termination of pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaasen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuveng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiberg, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaasen, A.</au><au>Tuveng, J.</au><au>Heiberg, A.</au><au>Scott, H.</au><au>Haugen, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>933</epage><pages>925-933</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. Methods This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second‐trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated. Results Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as ‘detectable’. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination—but not autopsy—confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter‐rater agreement was high (κ = 0.85). Conclusion Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>17121414</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.3871</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2006-12, Vol.28 (7), p.925-933
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68197163
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnostic imaging
Abortion, Eugenic
autopsy
Autopsy - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Female
Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Fetal Diseases - mortality
fetal malformation
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Induced abortion. Therapeutic abortion
Infant, Newborn
Male
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Prenatal Diagnosis
prenatal ultrasound
Retrospective Studies
termination of pregnancy
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
title Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second‐trimester abortions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20prenatal%20ultrasound%20and%20autopsy%20findings:%20a%20study%20of%20second%E2%80%90trimester%20abortions&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Kaasen,%20A.&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=933&rft.pages=925-933&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.3871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68197163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4141-41dd666cf9a73fda35583d80a0405273eca682029a8950c763a95e4744a897393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19274511&rft_id=info:pmid/17121414&rfr_iscdi=true