Loading…
Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria
Background Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myeloproliferative disease of infancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment modality, while the role of anti‐leukemic therapy prior to HSCT is uncertain. A comparative evaluatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2007-10, Vol.49 (5), p.629-633 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93 |
container_end_page | 633 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | Pediatric Blood & Cancer |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Bergstraesser, Eva Hasle, Henrik Rogge, Tim Fischer, Alexandra Zimmermann, Martin Noellke, Peter Niemeyer, Charlotte M. |
description | Background
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myeloproliferative disease of infancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment modality, while the role of anti‐leukemic therapy prior to HSCT is uncertain. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different clinical protocols and great variety of anti‐neoplastic drugs applied pre‐HSCT is hampered by the lack of uniform criteria of response. Classification schemas applied in other forms of leukemia are of little value, because in JMML therapy may result in divergent responses in solid organs compared to peripheral blood (PB).
Procedure
We therefore defined separate response criteria for white blood count (WBC), platelet count, liver size, and spleen size. We then retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of 129 treatment courses other than HSCT administered to 63 children with JMML. Treatment consisted of intensive therapy according to AML‐type chemotherapy, maintenance‐type combination therapy, and single agent therapy. To account for the variability observed in the natural course of disease, we also evaluated 32 episodes of “no therapy.”
Results
Best responses within 3 months of initiation of therapy were highly variable for the four response criteria. In contrast to platelet count and liver size, there was a significant correlation between WBC or spleen size and therapy. Response rates for WBC and spleen size were best for purine analogs, etoposide, and cytarabine as single agents or for maintenance‐type combination therapy.
Conclusion
To rigorously test future therapeutic strategies in this rare disease an international consensus on the definition of response criteria will be helpful. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:629–633. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pbc.21038 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68201480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20618836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0Eoj-w4AWQV0gs0tpJ7Djs2gEKUlUqfjSIjeU4N8JtbAfbacmT8Lp4OkNZIVa-lr5zru45CD2j5IgSUh5PnT4qKanEA7RPWc0KRmjz8H4m7R46iPEqo5ww8RjtUd62lFbVPvp14V3xHaxKfvIGktE4JrBYwzjiFJSL06hcUsl4l_-gkgWXsB_w1XwDzoyA7QKjt955vWzkI8zXYI16hU9wgBR8nEAncwNYOTUu0cQ89LiHwThzZ5vNAsTJuwhYB5MgGPUEPRrUGOHp7j1EX96--bx6V5x_OHu_OjkvdM2EKAYgXOTDxdAS2rG-q3Vf0l51TV32TSc4GxpaMlE2jDcVySHpjnLRVm1fq6pvq0P0Yus7Bf9jhpikNXFzvHLg5yi5KAmt84r_gSXhVIiKZ_DlFtT59BhgkFMwVoVFUiI3dclcl7yrK7PPd6ZzZ6H_S-76ycDxFrjNSS__dpKXp6s_lsVWYXKPP-8VKlzLnEDD5PriTDbrj5_Wry-_ya_Vb3iqsY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20618836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bergstraesser, Eva ; Hasle, Henrik ; Rogge, Tim ; Fischer, Alexandra ; Zimmermann, Martin ; Noellke, Peter ; Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergstraesser, Eva ; Hasle, Henrik ; Rogge, Tim ; Fischer, Alexandra ; Zimmermann, Martin ; Noellke, Peter ; Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myeloproliferative disease of infancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment modality, while the role of anti‐leukemic therapy prior to HSCT is uncertain. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different clinical protocols and great variety of anti‐neoplastic drugs applied pre‐HSCT is hampered by the lack of uniform criteria of response. Classification schemas applied in other forms of leukemia are of little value, because in JMML therapy may result in divergent responses in solid organs compared to peripheral blood (PB).
Procedure
We therefore defined separate response criteria for white blood count (WBC), platelet count, liver size, and spleen size. We then retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of 129 treatment courses other than HSCT administered to 63 children with JMML. Treatment consisted of intensive therapy according to AML‐type chemotherapy, maintenance‐type combination therapy, and single agent therapy. To account for the variability observed in the natural course of disease, we also evaluated 32 episodes of “no therapy.”
Results
Best responses within 3 months of initiation of therapy were highly variable for the four response criteria. In contrast to platelet count and liver size, there was a significant correlation between WBC or spleen size and therapy. Response rates for WBC and spleen size were best for purine analogs, etoposide, and cytarabine as single agents or for maintenance‐type combination therapy.
Conclusion
To rigorously test future therapeutic strategies in this rare disease an international consensus on the definition of response criteria will be helpful. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:629–633. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-5009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-5017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-911X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16991133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Blood Cells - drug effects ; chemotherapy ; Drug Evaluation ; Humans ; juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia ; Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - drug therapy ; Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - therapy ; Leukocyte Count ; Liver ; Organ Size - drug effects ; Platelet Count ; response criteria ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen ; treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2007-10, Vol.49 (5), p.629-633</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16991133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergstraesser, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasle, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogge, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noellke, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria</title><title>Pediatric Blood & Cancer</title><addtitle>Pediatr. Blood Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myeloproliferative disease of infancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment modality, while the role of anti‐leukemic therapy prior to HSCT is uncertain. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different clinical protocols and great variety of anti‐neoplastic drugs applied pre‐HSCT is hampered by the lack of uniform criteria of response. Classification schemas applied in other forms of leukemia are of little value, because in JMML therapy may result in divergent responses in solid organs compared to peripheral blood (PB).
Procedure
We therefore defined separate response criteria for white blood count (WBC), platelet count, liver size, and spleen size. We then retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of 129 treatment courses other than HSCT administered to 63 children with JMML. Treatment consisted of intensive therapy according to AML‐type chemotherapy, maintenance‐type combination therapy, and single agent therapy. To account for the variability observed in the natural course of disease, we also evaluated 32 episodes of “no therapy.”
Results
Best responses within 3 months of initiation of therapy were highly variable for the four response criteria. In contrast to platelet count and liver size, there was a significant correlation between WBC or spleen size and therapy. Response rates for WBC and spleen size were best for purine analogs, etoposide, and cytarabine as single agents or for maintenance‐type combination therapy.
Conclusion
To rigorously test future therapeutic strategies in this rare disease an international consensus on the definition of response criteria will be helpful. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:629–633. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>chemotherapy</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Organ Size - drug effects</subject><subject>Platelet Count</subject><subject>response criteria</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><subject>treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1545-5009</issn><issn>1545-5017</issn><issn>1096-911X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0Eoj-w4AWQV0gs0tpJ7Djs2gEKUlUqfjSIjeU4N8JtbAfbacmT8Lp4OkNZIVa-lr5zru45CD2j5IgSUh5PnT4qKanEA7RPWc0KRmjz8H4m7R46iPEqo5ww8RjtUd62lFbVPvp14V3xHaxKfvIGktE4JrBYwzjiFJSL06hcUsl4l_-gkgWXsB_w1XwDzoyA7QKjt955vWzkI8zXYI16hU9wgBR8nEAncwNYOTUu0cQ89LiHwThzZ5vNAsTJuwhYB5MgGPUEPRrUGOHp7j1EX96--bx6V5x_OHu_OjkvdM2EKAYgXOTDxdAS2rG-q3Vf0l51TV32TSc4GxpaMlE2jDcVySHpjnLRVm1fq6pvq0P0Yus7Bf9jhpikNXFzvHLg5yi5KAmt84r_gSXhVIiKZ_DlFtT59BhgkFMwVoVFUiI3dclcl7yrK7PPd6ZzZ6H_S-76ycDxFrjNSS__dpKXp6s_lsVWYXKPP-8VKlzLnEDD5PriTDbrj5_Wry-_ya_Vb3iqsY0</recordid><startdate>20071015</startdate><enddate>20071015</enddate><creator>Bergstraesser, Eva</creator><creator>Hasle, Henrik</creator><creator>Rogge, Tim</creator><creator>Fischer, Alexandra</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Martin</creator><creator>Noellke, Peter</creator><creator>Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071015</creationdate><title>Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria</title><author>Bergstraesser, Eva ; Hasle, Henrik ; Rogge, Tim ; Fischer, Alexandra ; Zimmermann, Martin ; Noellke, Peter ; Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>chemotherapy</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Organ Size - drug effects</topic><topic>Platelet Count</topic><topic>response criteria</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><topic>treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergstraesser, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasle, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogge, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noellke, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric Blood & Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergstraesser, Eva</au><au>Hasle, Henrik</au><au>Rogge, Tim</au><au>Fischer, Alexandra</au><au>Zimmermann, Martin</au><au>Noellke, Peter</au><au>Niemeyer, Charlotte M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric Blood & Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr. Blood Cancer</addtitle><date>2007-10-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>629-633</pages><issn>1545-5009</issn><eissn>1545-5017</eissn><eissn>1096-911X</eissn><abstract>Background
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myeloproliferative disease of infancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment modality, while the role of anti‐leukemic therapy prior to HSCT is uncertain. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different clinical protocols and great variety of anti‐neoplastic drugs applied pre‐HSCT is hampered by the lack of uniform criteria of response. Classification schemas applied in other forms of leukemia are of little value, because in JMML therapy may result in divergent responses in solid organs compared to peripheral blood (PB).
Procedure
We therefore defined separate response criteria for white blood count (WBC), platelet count, liver size, and spleen size. We then retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of 129 treatment courses other than HSCT administered to 63 children with JMML. Treatment consisted of intensive therapy according to AML‐type chemotherapy, maintenance‐type combination therapy, and single agent therapy. To account for the variability observed in the natural course of disease, we also evaluated 32 episodes of “no therapy.”
Results
Best responses within 3 months of initiation of therapy were highly variable for the four response criteria. In contrast to platelet count and liver size, there was a significant correlation between WBC or spleen size and therapy. Response rates for WBC and spleen size were best for purine analogs, etoposide, and cytarabine as single agents or for maintenance‐type combination therapy.
Conclusion
To rigorously test future therapeutic strategies in this rare disease an international consensus on the definition of response criteria will be helpful. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:629–633. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16991133</pmid><doi>10.1002/pbc.21038</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-5009 |
ispartof | Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2007-10, Vol.49 (5), p.629-633 |
issn | 1545-5009 1545-5017 1096-911X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68201480 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Blood Cells - drug effects chemotherapy Drug Evaluation Humans juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - drug therapy Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic - therapy Leukocyte Count Liver Organ Size - drug effects Platelet Count response criteria Retrospective Studies Spleen treatment Treatment Outcome |
title | Non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A retrospective analysis and definition of response criteria |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-hematopoietic%20stem%20cell%20transplantation%20treatment%20of%20juvenile%20myelomonocytic%20leukemia:%20A%20retrospective%20analysis%20and%20definition%20of%20response%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20Blood%20&%20Cancer&rft.au=Bergstraesser,%20Eva&rft.date=2007-10-15&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=629-633&rft.issn=1545-5009&rft.eissn=1545-5017&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pbc.21038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20618836%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-fe0680388f901b5db4cd21dab742d7b865f712582756730210cb168939d4a3d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20618836&rft_id=info:pmid/16991133&rfr_iscdi=true |