Loading…
Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales
The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Stud...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological reports 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03 |
container_end_page | 378 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Psychological reports |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Snyder, Steven M. Hall, James R. Cornwell, Sonya L. Quintana, Humberto |
description | The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (>79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68228484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pr0.99.2.363-378</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68228484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlW7hLnlXmAm9qqFQpCfeBumCY3dUqa1Jmm4r93SguuXF3O4TsH7kHokuCMciFu1h5nWmc0Y4KlTKoj1Cd5rlKhyccx6mPMWEo1Jz10FsIySoKZPEU9IknOFM776HYGWwffSVslo9o1rrB18m5rV9qNa5udPRxPxskdfNqta30yi36zSF4iB-EcnVS2DnBxuAP09nD_Opqk0-fHp9FwmhaM5ZuUQVUKDsQWklIrcIUVpVRphbkAKWVJC1nmFoBwoCBzypWQuJIVnWNNS8wG6Hrfu_btVwdhY1YuFFDXtoG2C0bEPsUVjyDeg4VvQ_BQmbV3K-t_DMFmt1jU2GhtqImLmbhYjFwdurv5Csq_wGGiCKR7INgFmGXb-Sb--n_hLzw6cy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68228484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (>79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17153805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology ; Bias ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Personality Assessment - standards ; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; United States</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378</ispartof><rights>2006 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17153805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (>79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</description><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlW7hLnlXmAm9qqFQpCfeBumCY3dUqa1Jmm4r93SguuXF3O4TsH7kHokuCMciFu1h5nWmc0Y4KlTKoj1Cd5rlKhyccx6mPMWEo1Jz10FsIySoKZPEU9IknOFM776HYGWwffSVslo9o1rrB18m5rV9qNa5udPRxPxskdfNqta30yi36zSF4iB-EcnVS2DnBxuAP09nD_Opqk0-fHp9FwmhaM5ZuUQVUKDsQWklIrcIUVpVRphbkAKWVJC1nmFoBwoCBzypWQuJIVnWNNS8wG6Hrfu_btVwdhY1YuFFDXtoG2C0bEPsUVjyDeg4VvQ_BQmbV3K-t_DMFmt1jU2GhtqImLmbhYjFwdurv5Csq_wGGiCKR7INgFmGXb-Sb--n_hLzw6cy0</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Snyder, Steven M.</creator><creator>Hall, James R.</creator><creator>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creator><creator>Quintana, Humberto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><author>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Steven M.</au><au>Hall, James R.</au><au>Cornwell, Sonya L.</au><au>Quintana, Humberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>363-378</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (>79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17153805</pmid><doi>10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2941 |
ispartof | Psychological reports, 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378 |
issn | 0033-2941 1558-691X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68228484 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology Bias Guidelines as Topic Humans Personality Assessment - standards Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results United States |
title | Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Clinical%20Validation%20of%20ADHD%20Behavior%20Rating%20Scales&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Snyder,%20Steven%20M.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=363-378&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68228484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68228484&rft_id=info:pmid/17153805&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pr0.99.2.363-378&rfr_iscdi=true |