Loading…

Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales

The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological reports 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378
Main Authors: Snyder, Steven M., Hall, James R., Cornwell, Sonya L., Quintana, Humberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03
container_end_page 378
container_issue 2
container_start_page 363
container_title Psychological reports
container_volume 99
creator Snyder, Steven M.
Hall, James R.
Cornwell, Sonya L.
Quintana, Humberto
description The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (>79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.
doi_str_mv 10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68228484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pr0.99.2.363-378</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68228484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlW7hLnlXmAm9qqFQpCfeBumCY3dUqa1Jmm4r93SguuXF3O4TsH7kHokuCMciFu1h5nWmc0Y4KlTKoj1Cd5rlKhyccx6mPMWEo1Jz10FsIySoKZPEU9IknOFM776HYGWwffSVslo9o1rrB18m5rV9qNa5udPRxPxskdfNqta30yi36zSF4iB-EcnVS2DnBxuAP09nD_Opqk0-fHp9FwmhaM5ZuUQVUKDsQWklIrcIUVpVRphbkAKWVJC1nmFoBwoCBzypWQuJIVnWNNS8wG6Hrfu_btVwdhY1YuFFDXtoG2C0bEPsUVjyDeg4VvQ_BQmbV3K-t_DMFmt1jU2GhtqImLmbhYjFwdurv5Csq_wGGiCKR7INgFmGXb-Sb--n_hLzw6cy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68228484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (&gt;79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17153805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology ; Bias ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Personality Assessment - standards ; Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; United States</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378</ispartof><rights>2006 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17153805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (&gt;79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</description><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlW7hLnlXmAm9qqFQpCfeBumCY3dUqa1Jmm4r93SguuXF3O4TsH7kHokuCMciFu1h5nWmc0Y4KlTKoj1Cd5rlKhyccx6mPMWEo1Jz10FsIySoKZPEU9IknOFM776HYGWwffSVslo9o1rrB18m5rV9qNa5udPRxPxskdfNqta30yi36zSF4iB-EcnVS2DnBxuAP09nD_Opqk0-fHp9FwmhaM5ZuUQVUKDsQWklIrcIUVpVRphbkAKWVJC1nmFoBwoCBzypWQuJIVnWNNS8wG6Hrfu_btVwdhY1YuFFDXtoG2C0bEPsUVjyDeg4VvQ_BQmbV3K-t_DMFmt1jU2GhtqImLmbhYjFwdurv5Csq_wGGiCKR7INgFmGXb-Sb--n_hLzw6cy0</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Snyder, Steven M.</creator><creator>Hall, James R.</creator><creator>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creator><creator>Quintana, Humberto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</title><author>Snyder, Steven M. ; Hall, James R. ; Cornwell, Sonya L. ; Quintana, Humberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Sonya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Humberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Steven M.</au><au>Hall, James R.</au><au>Cornwell, Sonya L.</au><au>Quintana, Humberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>363-378</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this review is to assess the range of overall accuracies for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behavior rating scales evaluated in clinical validation studies. Studies were characterized according to the evidence standards of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Studies were excluded due to major design problems such as overfitting by discriminant analysis. The 13 included evaluations of rating scales revealed overall accuracy in the range of 59%–79% with a pooled mean of 69% (±7%, standard deviation) and a pooled sample size of 2,228 subjects from nine studies. While some of the excluded studies demonstrated higher overall accuracies (&gt;79%), these studies were observed to have factors in experimental design and statistics that are known to unduly inflate accuracy. We recommend further research following the full AAN standards, namely well-designed, blinded, prospective studies of rating scales applied to clinically representative samples evaluated with a clinical standard.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17153805</pmid><doi>10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2941
ispartof Psychological reports, 2006-10, Vol.99 (2), p.363-378
issn 0033-2941
1558-691X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68228484
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology
Bias
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Personality Assessment - standards
Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
United States
title Review of Clinical Validation of ADHD Behavior Rating Scales
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Clinical%20Validation%20of%20ADHD%20Behavior%20Rating%20Scales&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Snyder,%20Steven%20M.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=363-378&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pr0.99.2.363-378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68228484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-3efd64e1ac722a60f08222898046e777d2c7d5aee14e2e75248670f7f2b092d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68228484&rft_id=info:pmid/17153805&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pr0.99.2.363-378&rfr_iscdi=true