Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation

This paper investigated the potential use of silica nanoparticles (SNPs) as pseudostationary phase (PSP) for protein separation. The wall adsorption of SNPs as well as the influences of SNPs and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The SNPs showed selectivity toward the proteins, and the concent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electrophoresis 2007-09, Vol.28 (17), p.3017-3023
Main Author: Qin, Weidong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adsorption
CEC
Electrophoresis, Capillary - methods
Ethylene Oxide - chemistry
Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles - chemistry
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
Pseudostationary phase
Silicon Dioxide - chemistry
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53
container_end_page 3023
container_issue 17
container_start_page 3017
container_title Electrophoresis
container_volume 28
creator Qin, Weidong
description This paper investigated the potential use of silica nanoparticles (SNPs) as pseudostationary phase (PSP) for protein separation. The wall adsorption of SNPs as well as the influences of SNPs and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The SNPs showed selectivity toward the proteins, and the concentration ratio of SNPs to PEO influenced the separation. The proteins that could not be baseline-resolved under conventional CZE mode were separated in a buffer consisting of 30 mM phosphoric acid, 0.05% PEO, and 0.05% SNPs at pH 2.37, with detection limits ranging from 2 to 45.5 ppm. The intraday and interday RSDs of the migration times were in the ranges of 2.1-2.8% (n = 5) and 2.5-3.4% (three days, n = 3x5 = 15), respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/elps.200600476
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68229090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68229090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EotvClSPkxC3L2E5s50irZYu0KkgtVOJiTeIJGLJJamcF_fd4m1XhtpfxYb73NH6PsVcclhxAvKNujEsBoAAKrZ6wBS-FyIUy8ilbANcyByPLE3Ya409ITFUUz9kJ10qVUvMFW137zjeY9dgPI4bJNx3FDGM2Rtq5IU44-aHHcJ-NPzBS1g4hG8Mwke-zSEnxsH_BnrXYRXp5eM_YzYfVzcVlvvm0_njxfpM3pZQqTdeAbp0j5xwgb9q6qEulUPH0GeIawVGpONSVhtpU0LjWCCRhTFtgKc_Y29k2XXC3ozjZrY8NdR32NOyiVUaICio4CkoAw4GLo6CAdJp4AJcz2IQhxkCtHYPfplwsB7tvwu6bsI9NJMHrg_Ou3pL7hx-iT0A1A799R_dH7Oxq8_n6f_N81vo40Z9HLYZfVmmpS3t7tbYgz799vV1f2fPEv5n5FgeL34OP9kuy4_scQEht5F-P7K6G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20611212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Qin, Weidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Weidong</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigated the potential use of silica nanoparticles (SNPs) as pseudostationary phase (PSP) for protein separation. The wall adsorption of SNPs as well as the influences of SNPs and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The SNPs showed selectivity toward the proteins, and the concentration ratio of SNPs to PEO influenced the separation. The proteins that could not be baseline-resolved under conventional CZE mode were separated in a buffer consisting of 30 mM phosphoric acid, 0.05% PEO, and 0.05% SNPs at pH 2.37, with detection limits ranging from 2 to 45.5 ppm. The intraday and interday RSDs of the migration times were in the ranges of 2.1-2.8% (n = 5) and 2.5-3.4% (three days, n = 3x5 = 15), respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0173-0835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600476</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17665371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; CEC ; Electrophoresis, Capillary - methods ; Ethylene Oxide - chemistry ; Nanoparticles ; Nanoparticles - chemistry ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Pseudostationary phase ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Electrophoresis, 2007-09, Vol.28 (17), p.3017-3023</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17665371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Weidong</creatorcontrib><title>Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation</title><title>Electrophoresis</title><addtitle>ELECTROPHORESIS</addtitle><description>This paper investigated the potential use of silica nanoparticles (SNPs) as pseudostationary phase (PSP) for protein separation. The wall adsorption of SNPs as well as the influences of SNPs and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The SNPs showed selectivity toward the proteins, and the concentration ratio of SNPs to PEO influenced the separation. The proteins that could not be baseline-resolved under conventional CZE mode were separated in a buffer consisting of 30 mM phosphoric acid, 0.05% PEO, and 0.05% SNPs at pH 2.37, with detection limits ranging from 2 to 45.5 ppm. The intraday and interday RSDs of the migration times were in the ranges of 2.1-2.8% (n = 5) and 2.5-3.4% (three days, n = 3x5 = 15), respectively.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>CEC</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary - methods</subject><subject>Ethylene Oxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Pseudostationary phase</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><issn>0173-0835</issn><issn>1522-2683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EotvClSPkxC3L2E5s50irZYu0KkgtVOJiTeIJGLJJamcF_fd4m1XhtpfxYb73NH6PsVcclhxAvKNujEsBoAAKrZ6wBS-FyIUy8ilbANcyByPLE3Ya409ITFUUz9kJ10qVUvMFW137zjeY9dgPI4bJNx3FDGM2Rtq5IU44-aHHcJ-NPzBS1g4hG8Mwke-zSEnxsH_BnrXYRXp5eM_YzYfVzcVlvvm0_njxfpM3pZQqTdeAbp0j5xwgb9q6qEulUPH0GeIawVGpONSVhtpU0LjWCCRhTFtgKc_Y29k2XXC3ozjZrY8NdR32NOyiVUaICio4CkoAw4GLo6CAdJp4AJcz2IQhxkCtHYPfplwsB7tvwu6bsI9NJMHrg_Ou3pL7hx-iT0A1A799R_dH7Oxq8_n6f_N81vo40Z9HLYZfVmmpS3t7tbYgz799vV1f2fPEv5n5FgeL34OP9kuy4_scQEht5F-P7K6G</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Qin, Weidong</creator><general>Wiley-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation</title><author>Qin, Weidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>CEC</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary - methods</topic><topic>Ethylene Oxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Pseudostationary phase</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Weidong</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Weidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation</atitle><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle><addtitle>ELECTROPHORESIS</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3017</spage><epage>3023</epage><pages>3017-3023</pages><issn>0173-0835</issn><eissn>1522-2683</eissn><abstract>This paper investigated the potential use of silica nanoparticles (SNPs) as pseudostationary phase (PSP) for protein separation. The wall adsorption of SNPs as well as the influences of SNPs and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied. The SNPs showed selectivity toward the proteins, and the concentration ratio of SNPs to PEO influenced the separation. The proteins that could not be baseline-resolved under conventional CZE mode were separated in a buffer consisting of 30 mM phosphoric acid, 0.05% PEO, and 0.05% SNPs at pH 2.37, with detection limits ranging from 2 to 45.5 ppm. The intraday and interday RSDs of the migration times were in the ranges of 2.1-2.8% (n = 5) and 2.5-3.4% (three days, n = 3x5 = 15), respectively.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>17665371</pmid><doi>10.1002/elps.200600476</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0173-0835
ispartof Electrophoresis, 2007-09, Vol.28 (17), p.3017-3023
issn 0173-0835
1522-2683
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68229090
source Wiley
subjects Adsorption
CEC
Electrophoresis, Capillary - methods
Ethylene Oxide - chemistry
Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles - chemistry
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
Pseudostationary phase
Silicon Dioxide - chemistry
title Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silica%20nanoparticles%20as%20pseudostationary%20phase%20for%20protein%20separation&rft.jtitle=Electrophoresis&rft.au=Qin,%20Weidong&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3017&rft.epage=3023&rft.pages=3017-3023&rft.issn=0173-0835&rft.eissn=1522-2683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/elps.200600476&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68229090%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5336-c5dc07fddeddd0a1cfb4b566a61100e17a0de5610b970b890cdf82ae288f4a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20611212&rft_id=info:pmid/17665371&rfr_iscdi=true